Skip to main content

Non-traditional Family Building Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reproductive Health and Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 732))

Abstract

Fertility patients frequently report living in a binary world, one divided between the fertile and the infertile. However, adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors who later learn they will have difficulty conceiving or bearing children have similar reactions to their diagnosis, but with some marked differences, as the injustices of their reality are much more complex. They frequently feel betrayed because the very treatments used to save their lives may be the ones that have caused them to be unable to have biogenetic children of their own, unable to fulfill their need for generativity and their longing for a return to normalcy [1]. In 1999, it was predicted that by the time this book is published [2012] one in every 250 young adults would be a survivor of cancer [2]. Although the ability to have biogenetically related offspring has been the topic of countless articles and books published in the area of reproductive health and medicine, less than half of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors can recall their oncologist or other members of their medical team discussing fertility related issues, including fertility preservation, prior to commencement of treatment [3–10]. Of those who did remember their physicians providing facts, advice, details, or statistics about fertility, many believed the information they received was inadequate and presented in an untimely manor [8–13].

Having cancer has been quite scary and physically exhausting. I felt sick and was worried that I would die. After the treatment put me into remission, I was nervous that I might never have a child. At the same time, I was also concerned I would pass my bad genes to my children and they eventually would get cancer too.

Since finding out that as a result of my cancer treatment I am sterile, many of my friends walk on eggshells when they are around me. I can see by their sideway glances that they are trying to be sensitive and considerate when speaking about their pregnancies and their children. I feel it is my job to reassure them that these are not forbidden topics.

I am quite fortunate. As soon as my oncologist informed me that my cancer treatment would cause infertility, my middle sister told me that when I wanted to become pregnant and have a child, she would like to donate her eggs to me. The reproductive endocrinologist with whom we consulted told us that quite often sisters donate eggs to sisters. Luckily, my middle sister Rita is 23 years old, and is eligible to help me out.

Not to be outdone by Rita, my youngest sister Melody offered to act as our gestational carrier, should I be unable to carry a baby to term. My husband and I will have to wait until Melody first has her own child to see whether she still wishes to be pregnant with our child. However, two of my closest friends who already have children have also volunteered to carry our child.

I am choosing not to disclose to my friends that Rita will act as my egg donor because I believe that the information about my child’s conception should belong to my child and that Jake and I have the obligation to be the first ones to explain the facts about his or her conception. Only after I disclose to my child, do I intend to tell others. Of course, everyone will already know that Melody acted as our gestational surrogate because I won’t ever be pregnant. My doctor told me that if one of my friends acts as our gestational carrier, I will have to tell her that we used Rita’s eggs to conceive.

However, this experience also has been very humbling. I do not think I would have been the type of sister or friend who would have gone through controlled ovarian hyperstimulation or pregnancy for anyone other than me. This has caused me to take a good, hard look at myself and my life. I hope I become a better person as a result of having gone through cancer treatment.

Joanna, Adult Cancer Patient

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Eiser C, Penn A, Katz E, Barr R (eds) (2009) Psychosocial issues and quality of life. Elsevier Seminars in Oncology 36:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ries LAG, Smith MA, Gurney JG, Linet M, Tamra T, Young J et al (1999) Cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents: United States SEER Program 1975–1995. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute SEER Program NIH Pub no. 994649

    Google Scholar 

  3. Algier L, Kav S (2008) Nurses’ approach to sexuality-related issues in patients receiving cancer treatments. Turk J Cancer 38(3):135–141

    Google Scholar 

  4. Deming S (2007) OncoLog 51. http://www2.mdanderson.org/depts/oncolog/articles/06/1-Jan-06-1.html

  5. Forman EJ, Anders CK, Behera MA (2010) A nationwide survey of oncologists regarding treatment-related infertility and fertility preservation in female cancer patients. Fertil Steril 94:1652–1661

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jones BL (2008) Promoting healthy development among survivors of adolescent cancer. Fam Commun Health 31:S61–S70

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, Patrizio P, Wallace WH, Hagerty K et al (2006) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24(18):2917–2931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mancini J, Rey D, Préau M, Malavolti L, Moatti JP (2008) Infertility induced by cancer treatment: inappropriate or no information provided to majority of French survivors of cancer. Fertil Steril 90(5):1616–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nieman CL, Kazer R, Brannigan RE, Zoloth LS, Chase-Lansdale PL, Kinahan K et al (2006) Cancer survivors and infertility: a review of a new problem and novel answers. J Support Oncol 4(4):171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Ziegler D, Streuli I, Vasilopoulos I, Decanter C, This P, Chapron C (2010) Cancer and fecundity issues mandate a multidisciplinary approach. Fertil Steril 93(3):691–696

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jukkala AM, Azuero A, McNees P, Bates GW, Meneses K (2010) Self-assessed knowledge of treatment and fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 94(6):2396–2398

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meseguer M, Molina N, García-Velasco JA, Remohí J, Pellicer A, Garrido N (2006) Sperm cryopreservation in oncological patients: a 14-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril 85(3):640–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schover LR (1999) Psychosocial aspects of infertility and decisions about reproduction in young cancer survivors: a review. Med Pediatr Oncol 33(1):53–59

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zebrack BJ, Mills J, Weitzman TS (2007) Health and supportive care needs of young adult cancer patients and survivors. J Cancer Survivorship 1(2):137–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schover LR (2005) Motivation for parenthood after cancer: a review. JNCI Monogr 2005(34):2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soliman H, Agresta SV (2008) Current issues in adolescent and young adult cancer survivorship. Cancer Control 15(1):55–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clinton-McHarg T, Carey M, Sanson-Fisher R, Shakeshaft A, Rainbird K (2010) Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a critical review. Cancer 8:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Odo R, Potter C (2009) Understanding the needs of young adult cancer survivors: a clinical perspective. Oncology (Williston Park, NY) 23(11 Suppl Nurse Ed) 33:23–27

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maier DB, Covington SN, Maier LU (2006) Patients with medically complicating conditions. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  20. Noll RB, Kupst MJ (2007) Commentary: the psychological impact of pediatric cancer hardiness, the exception or the rule? J Pediatr Psychol 32(9):1089–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rourke MT, Hobbie WL, Schwartz L, Kazak AE (2007) Posttrauamatic stress disorder (PTSD) in young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 49(2):177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eggert J, Theobald H, Engfeldt P (2004) Effects of alcohol consumption on female fertility during an 18-year period. Fertil Steril 81(2):379–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaur DS, Talekar MS, Pathak VP (2010) Alcohol intake and cigarette smoking: Impact of two major lifestyle factors on male fertility. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 53(1):35–40

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jensen TK, Hjollund NKI, Henriksen TB, Scheike T, Kolstad H, Giwercman A et al (1998) Does moderate alcohol consumption affect fertility? Follow up study among couples planning first pregnancy. BMJ 317(7157):505–510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Silva PD, Cool J, Olson K (1999) Impact of lifestyle choices on female infertility. J Reprod Med 44(3):288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones L (2008) Surviving childhood cancer – growing up too fast. J Reprod Med 44:288–296

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zebrack BJ, Zeltzer LK (2003) Quality of life issues and cancer survivorship. Curr Probl Cancer 27(4):198–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen AF, Pedersen B, Lauritsen JG (1995) Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination Attitudes and opinions of Danish and Swedish donor insemination patients to psychosocial information being supplied to offspring and relatives. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 74(1):45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Merz JF, Fischhoff B (1990) Informed consent does not mean rational consent. J Legal Med 11:321–350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bryan C (2008) Provider and policy response to reverse the consequences of low health literacy. J Healthcare Manag/Am Coll Healthc Exec 53(4):230–241

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, Dieckmann N (2007) Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff 26(3):741–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Paterick TJ, Carson GV, Allen MC et al (2008) Medical informed consent: general considerations for physicians. Mayo Clin Proc 83:272–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Education USDo (2003) National assessment of adult literacy. Institute of Education Sciences. http://nces.ed.gov/naal/newsarchives.asp

  34. Lundgren RE, McMakin AH (2009) Risk communication: a handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks. Wiley-IEEE Press (4th ed) Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  35. Partridge AH (2008) Fertility preservation: a vital survivorship issue for young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(16):2612–2613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Packard E (2007) That teenage feeling. Monitor Psychol 38:20–21

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rosso IM, Young AD, Femia LA, Yurgelun Todd DA (2004) Cognitive and emotional components of frontal lobe functioning in childhood and adolescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1021(1):355–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Jernigan TL, Toga AW (1999) In vivo evidence for postadolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat Neurosci 2:859–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Tessner KD, Toga AW (2001) Mapping continued brain growth and gray matter density reduction in dorsal frontal cortex: inverse relationships during postadolescent brain maturation. J Neurosci 21(22):8819–8829

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Agarwal A, Ranganathan P, Kattal N, Pasqualotto F, Hallak J, Khayal S et al (2004) Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril 81(2):342–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Crha I, Ventruba P, Zakova J, Huser M, Kubesova B, Hudecek R et al (2009) Survival and infertility treatment in male cancer patients after sperm banking. Fertil Steril 91(6):2344–2348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Descombe L, Chauleur C, Gentil-Perret A, Aknin-Seifer I, Tostain J, Lévy R (2008) Testicular sperm extraction in a single cancerous testicle in patients with azoospermia: a case report. Fertil Steril 90(2):443, e1–e4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Friedler S, Raziel A, Schachter M, Strassburger D, Bern O, Ron-El R (2002) Outcome of first and repeated testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 17(9):2356–2361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gabrielsen A, Fedder J, Agerholm I (2006) Parameters predicting the implantation rate of thawed IVF/ICSI embryos: a retrospective study. Reprod Biomed Online 12(1):70–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Ginsburg ES, Yanushpolsky EH, Jackson KV (2001) In vitro fertilization for cancer patients and survivors. Fertil Steril 75(4):705–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hallak M (1998) Why cancer patients request disposal of cryopreserved semen specimens posttherapy: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril 69(5): 889–893

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Heidenreich A, Altmann P, Engelmann UH (2000) Microsurgical vasovastomy versus microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration/testicular extraction of sperm combined with intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Eur Urol 37:609–614

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kolettis PN (2002) The evaluation and management of the azoospermic patient. J Androl 23(3):293–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Modder TK, Kohler T, Brannigan RE (2007) Fertility preservation: outcomes for Onco-TESE in male cancer patients prior to oncological therapy. Fertil Steril 88:S393–S394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ragni G, Arnoldi M, Somigliana E, Paffoni A, Brambilla ME, Restelli L (2005) Reproductive prognosis in male patients with azoospermia at the time of cancer diagnosis. Fertil Steril 83(6):1674–1679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2005) Fertility preservation and reproduction in cancer patients. Fertil Steril 83(6):1622–1628

    Google Scholar 

  52. Schover LR, Brey K, Lichtin A, Lipshultz LI, Jeha S (2002) Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. J Clin Oncol 20(7):1880–1889

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA (1999) Having children after cancer. Cancer 86(4):697–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dotinga R (2010) Fast-freeze may help sperm survive storage, Study finds. http://health.usnews.com/health_news/family-health/womens-health/articles/2010/09/14/fast-freeze

  55. Fatimathas L (2010) Hope for post-childhood cancer sperm production. http://wwww.Bio-news.org.uk/page_64914.asp

  56. Berger DM (1980) Couples’ reactions to male infertility and donor insemination. Am J Psychiatry 137(9):1047–1049

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Daniels K, Blyth E, Crawshaw M, Curson R (2005) Short communication: previous semen donors and their views regarding the sharing of information with offspring. Hum Reprod 20(6):1670–1675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Daniels KR, Thorn P, Westerbrooke R (2007) Confidence in the use of donor insemination: an evaluation of the impact of participating in a group preparation programme. Hum Fertil 10(1):13–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Daniluk JC (1988) Infertility: intrapersonal and interpersonal impact. Fertil Steril 49(6):982–990

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Petok WD (2006) The psychology of gender specific infertility diagnosis. In: Covington SN, Burns LH (eds) Infertility counseling: a comprehensive handbook for clinicians. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 37–60

    Google Scholar 

  61. Thorn P (2006) Recipient counseling for donor insemination. In: Covington S, Hammer Burns L (eds) Infertility counselling a comprehensive handbook for clinicians, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York, NY, pp 305–318

    Google Scholar 

  62. Baron A, Pannor R (1993) (2nd ed) Lethal secrets: the psychology of donor insemination, problems, and solutions. Amistad, New York

    Google Scholar 

  63. Berger DM, Eisen A, Shuber J, Doody KF (1986) Psychological patterns in donor insemination couples. Can J Psychiatry Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 31(9):818–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Carr EK, Friedman T, Lannon B, Sharp P (1990) The study of psychological factors in couples receiving artificial insemination by donor: a discussion of methodological difficulties. J Adv Nurs 15(8):906–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Clarke RN, Klock SC, Geoghegan A, Travassos DE (1999) Relationship between psychological stress and semen quality among in-vitro fertilization patients. Hum Reprod 14(3):753–758

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Daniels KR (2004) Building a family with the assistance of donor insemination. Dunmore Press, Palmerston N, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  67. Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Wozny M (1992) The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men’s and women’s response to infertility. Fertil Steril 57(1):113–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Van Thiel M, Mantadakis E, Vekemans M, Gillot VF (1990) A psychological study, using interviews and projective tests, of patients seeking anonymous donor artificial insemination. J de gynécologie, obstétrique et biologie de la reproduction 19(7):823–828

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hart VA (2002) Infertility and the role of psychotherapy. Issues Mental Health Nurs 23(1):31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Horowitz JE, Galst JP, Elster N (2010) Ethical dilemmas in fertility counseling. American Psychological Association Books: Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  71. Goldstein J, Freud A, Solnit A (1973) Beyond the best interests of the child. Wiley Online Library, Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  72. Silber SJ, Nagy Z, Devroey P, Camus M, Van Steirteghem AC (1997) The effect of female age and ovarian reserve on pregnancy rate in male infertility: treatment of azoospermia with sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 12(12):2693–2700

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Ethics Committee of the ASRM (2004) Family members as gamete donors and surrogates. Fertil Steril 82:S217–S223

    Google Scholar 

  74. Marshall LA (2002) Ethical and legal issues in the use of related donors for therapeutic insemination. Urol Clin North Am 29(4):855–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Nikolettos N, Asimakopoulos B, Hatzissabas I (2003) Intrafamilial sperm donation: ethical questions and concerns. Hum Reprod 18(5):933–936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Lui S, Weaver S, Robinson J, Debono M, Nieland M, Killick S et al (1995) A survey of semen donor attitudes. Hum Reprod 10(1):234–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Mahlstedt PP, Probasco KA (1991) Sperm donors: Their attitudes toward providing medical and psychosocial information for recent couples and donor offspring. Fertil Steril 4(56):747–753

    Google Scholar 

  78. Pedersen B, Nielsen AF, Lauritsen JG (1994) Psychosocial aspects of donor insemination: sperm donors-their motivations and attitudes to artificial insemination. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 73(9):701–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Purdie A, Peek J, Irwin R, Ellis J, Graham F, Fisher P (1992) Identifiable semen donors--attitudes of donors and recipient couples. N Z Med J 105(927):27–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Rowland R (1985) The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor (AID) programmes. Soc Sci Med 21(4):391–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Crawshaw MA, Blyth ED, Daniels KR (2007) Past semen donors’ view about the use of a voluntary contact register. Reproductive medicine online [serial on the Internet]. http://www.rbmonline.com/4DCG1/Issues/Details. 14:411–417

  82. Robertson AD, Missmer SA, Ginsburg ES (2011) Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy. Fertil Steril 96(1):122–125

    Google Scholar 

  83. Abdallah RT, Muasher SJ (2006) Surviving cancer, saving fertility: the promise of cryopreservation. Sex Reprod Menopause 4(1):7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lutchman Singh K, Davies M, Chatterjee R (2005) Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing. Hum Reprod Update 11(1):69–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Meirow D (2010) Fertility preservation: New developments. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53(4):727–739

    Google Scholar 

  86. Maunsell E, Pogany L, Barrera M, Shaw AK, Speechley KN (2006) Quality of life among long-term adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(16):2527–2535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Kim SS (2006) Fertility preservation in female cancer patients: current developments and future directions. Fertil Steril 85(1):1–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Silber SJ (2005) How to get pregnant. Hachette Digital, Little Brown, New York

    Google Scholar 

  89. Taylor A (2001) Systematic diversities of ovarian failure. J Soc Gynecol Invest 8:S7–S9

    Google Scholar 

  90. Sauer MV, Kavic SM (2006) Oocyte and embryo donation 2006: reviewing two decades of innovation and controversy. Reprod Biomed Online 12(2):153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Balaban B, Urman B, Isiklar A, Alatas C, Aksoy S, Mercan R et al (2001) The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Hum Reprod 16(11):2357–2361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Sher G, Davis VM, Stoess J (2005) In vitro fertilization: the art of making babies: facts on file, 3rd edn. Checkmark Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  93. Bedaiwy MA, Shahin AY, Falcone T (2008) Reproductive organ transplantation: advances and controversies. Fertil Steril 90(6):2031–2055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Clark O (2010) Scientists create ‘artificial’ ovary. BioNews. http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_70822.as;?dinfo=HM.PYHdDBZDHtfOTuNsZ9gok

  95. Sit ASY, Modugno F, Weissfeld JL, Berga SL, Ness RB (2002) Hormone replacement therapy formulations and risk of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 86(2):118–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhang J, Grifo JA, Del Priore G (2005) Gestational carrier pregnancy with oocytes obtained during surgery for stage IIIc ovarian cancer after controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 83(5):1547, e15–e17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Practice Committee of the ASRM and the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Medicine (2006) Ovarian tissue and oocyte preservation. Fertil Steril 86(Suppl 3): S241–S246

    Google Scholar 

  98. Patrizio P, Caplan AL (2010) Ethical issues surrounding fertility preservation in cancer patients. Clin Obstetrics Gynecol 53(4):717–726

    Google Scholar 

  99. Oehninger S (2005) Strategies for fertility preservation in female and male cancer survivors. J Soc Gynecol Invest 12(4):222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Schover LR (2005) Sexuality and fertility after cancer. Hematology 2005(1):523–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. MacCallum F, Lycett E, Murray C, Jadva V, Golombok S (2003) Surrogacy: the experience of commissioning couples. Hum Reprod 18(6):1334–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Jadva V, Murray C, Lycett E, MacCallum F, Golombok S (2003) Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers. Hum Reprod 18(10):2196–2204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Blyth E (1994) «I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say «I’ve done something interesting in my life»: interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain. J Reprod Infant Psychol 12:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Ciccarelli JC, Beckman LJ (2005) Navigating rough waters: an overview of psychological aspects of surrogacy. J Soc Issues 61(1):21–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. van den Akker OBA (2005) A longitudinal pre-pregnancy to post-delivery comparison of genetic and gestational surrogate and intended mothers: confidence and genealogy. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 26(4):277–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. van den Akker O (2007) Psychosocial aspects of surrogate motherhood. Hum Reprod Update 13(1):53–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Farr RH, Forssell SL, Patterson CJ (2010) Parenting and child development in adoptive families: does parental sexual orientation matter? Appl Dev Sci 14(3):164–178

    Google Scholar 

  108. Moss A (2004) Adoption: challenges and solutions after breast cancer. http://www.lbbc.org/content/newsletter.

  109. Rosen A (2005) Third party reproduction and adoption in cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr March 1

    Google Scholar 

  110. Grotevant HD (1997) Coming to terms with adoption: the construction of identity from adolescents into adulthood. Adopt Q 1:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Brodzinsky D (1990) A stress and coping model of adoption adjustment. In: Brodzinsky D, Schecter M (eds) Psychology of adoption. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith E. Horowitz PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horowitz, J.E. (2012). Non-traditional Family Building Planning. In: Quinn, G., Vadaparampil, S. (eds) Reproductive Health and Cancer in Adolescents and Young Adults. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 732. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2492-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics