Abstract
In this chapter we continue our investigations of students who have made the transition to becoming mathematicians. We report on a study with mathematics graduates that focused on their views of the role of communication in their transition to professional work. Here, we use the notion of mathematical communication as another lens to investigate the move from study to work. Communication is a key professional (and indeed personal) skill, and the discipline of mathematics places particular demands on this skill and engenders particular approaches to its utilisation. We find that recent graduates are keenly aware of the importance of mathematical communication and attribute their professional successes or problems in large part to their abilities or lack of abilities for effective communication. In particular, we look at graduates’ ideas of mathematical communication, specifically with people who were not mathematically trained, and identify three conceptions: ‘jargon and notation’, ‘concepts and thinking’ and ‘strength’. We also identify three conceptions of learning mathematical communication: ‘trial and error’, ‘mediated by others and outside situations’ and ‘active, detached observation’. Rather than focusing on the more general aspects of interpersonal communication, such as working in teams, we concentrate on the descriptions by graduates of how they use mathematical communication in their employment and on their views of how they learnt that communication. Their experiences and reflections will be valuable for any student who is aiming to become a mathematician, and any teacher who is helping students in that endeavour.
Note: Some of the material in this chapter was previously published in Wood, L.N. (2012). Practice and conceptions: Communicating mathematics in the workplace. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 79(1), 109–125
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ALTC Australian Learning & Teaching Council. (2011). Learning & teaching academic standards project. Paris: ALTC. Online at http://www.altc.edu.au/standards
Anderson, J. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35–44.
Barton, B. (2008). The language of mathematics: Telling mathematical tales. New York: Springer.
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
Billett, S. (2009). Workplace as a learning environment? Challenge for theory and methodology. Keynote talk at Researching Work and Learning 6 (RWL6), Roskilde University, Denmark, July 2009.
Burton, L. (2004). Mathematicians as enquirers – Learning about learning mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cajori, F. (1928). A history of mathematical notations (Vol. I). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
Cajori, F. (1929). A history of mathematical notations (Vol. II). Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glaser, R. (1989). Expertise and learning: How do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structures? In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 269–282). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Jørgensen, M., & Phillips, L. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: SAGE Publications.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McGrail, M., Richard, C., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research and Development, 25(1), 19–35.
OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO) project. Paris: OECD. Online at http://www.oecd.org/document/13/0,3746,en_2649_35961291_42295693_1_1_1_1,00.html
Perkins, D., Jay, E., & Tishman, S. (1993). Beyond abilities: A dispositional theory of thinking. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 39(1), 1–21.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120). London: SAGE Publications.
Wood, L. N., & Solomonides, I. (2008). Different disciplines, different transitions. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(2), 117–134.
Wood, L. N., Thomas, T., & Rigby, B. (2011). Assessment and standards for graduate attributes. Asian Social Science, 7(4), 12–17. Online at http://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/viewFile/9387/7126
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wood, L.N., Petocz, P., Reid, A. (2012). What Is the Role of Communication in Mathematics Graduates’ Transition to Professional Work?. In: Becoming a Mathematician. Mathematics Education Library, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2984-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2984-1_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2983-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2984-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)