Skip to main content

Biofuel Production Byproducts as Soil Amendments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organic Fertilisation, Soil Quality and Human Health

Part of the book series: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews ((SARV,volume 9))

Abstract

Attempts to reduce reliance on fossil fuel as the sole source of energy has resulted in production of energy from different organic materials. Due to increasing demand worldwide, production of energy from renewable sources has been growing rapidly, and it was estimated in 2002 to contribute to 14% of the world’s energy supply. Several technologies such as biochemical, fermentation, thermo-chemical, gasification and pyrolysis, chemical extraction, and transesterification processes have been employed to convert organic materials to energy. These technologies ­produce not only energy, but also valuable byproducts which include distillers grain, thin stillage, glycerol, ash and biochar. Due to the growing bioenergy production industry, there will be an abundance of byproducts being generated. Recently, some of these byproducts are disposed of by incineration, e.g. glycerol, or landfilling, e.g. ash. This disposal may have adverse effects on the environment. Therefore, a proper method, which can be economically sound and environmentally safe, needs to be sought. As these byproducts are organic and contain carbon and plant nutrients that are potentially valuable to soils and production of crops, consideration of potential uses of the byproducts must include their application to soil. Carbon and other plant essential nutrients in the byproducts can be added to soil and recycled. If fed to animals, such as in the case of distillers grain and thin stillage byproducts, manure is produced containing a higher content of nutrient compared to animals fed regular grain. This type of manure may hurt the environment if not properly managed. The potential for recycling nutrient in soil-plant system through direct or indirect application of bioenergy ­byproducts is not widely ­covered in the literature. This review covers relevant information on the potential use of bioenergy production byproducts as soil amendments and organic fertilizers in agricultural lands, and considers opportunities for future applications.

We found that direct application of distillers grain to soil benefited crop growth, suppressed weeds, and was accessible by soil microorganisms, resulting in organic matter decomposition and therefore contributing to nutrient release and availability for plant uptake. Thin stillage use as a soil amendment has not widely been practiced, and there is a lack of documented information in this regard. It was found to be a viable source of nutrient and provided plant essential nutrient; however, its residual effect on crop production was more evident than its direct application effect. This indicates the slow release of nutrients from thin stillage organic matter persisting into the following growing seasons. Compared to the other byproducts covered in this review, glycerol was the least studied bioenergy production byproduct as a soil amendment. It was found that glycerol application to soil at a high rate of 1,000 kg ha−1 reduced the yield and N uptake and related this to a possible immobilization of available N by soil microorganisms. It was demonstrated in the most reviewed studies that ash application to soil increased crop yield and nutrient uptake, especially P and K. Biochar addition to soil contributed to crop yield increase, and this was attributed to reduction of nutrient losses, resulting in enhancement of nutrient use efficiency. Besides its agronomic benefits, it was reported in some studies that biochar application could have environmental benefits through its ability to reduce nutrient loss by leaching and runoff, absorb pesticides and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Inclusion of distillers grain in animal diets was found to have a significant effect on manure nutrients content and forms. This will promote including this type of manure in farm management plan and make it more valuable as organic fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitken MN, Evans B, Lewis JG (1998) Effect of applying paper mill sludge to arable land on soil fertility and crop yields. Soil Manag 14:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibeque SL, Freetly HC, Cole NA, Ferrell CL (2007) The influence of oscillating dietary protein concentrations on finishing cattle. II. Nutrient retention and ammonia emissions. J Anim Sci 85:1496–1503. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • AURI (2008) The newspaper of the Agricultural Utilization Research Institute. Ag Innovation News April–June. Formulating food and fuel, 17, pp 12. Available at http://www.auri.org/agnews/AgInnovationNewsSpring08.pdf. Verified 25 Jan 2011

  • Bachmann S, Eichler-Löbermann B (2010) Soil Phosphorus Pools as Affected by Application of Poultry Litter Ash in Combination with Catch Crop Cultivation. Commun Soil Sci and Plant Analy 41:1098–1111.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Belyea R (2004) Composition of corn and distillers dried grains with solubles from dry grind ethanol processing. Bioresour Technol 94:293–298. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.01.001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benke MB, Hao X, Caffyn P, Schoenau JJ, McAllister TA (2010) Using manure from cattle fed dried distillers’ grains with solubles (DDGS) as fertilizer: effects on nutrient accumulation in soil and uptake by barley. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:720–727. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson C, Wright C, McCarthick J, Pritchard R (2006) Effect of increasing dietary concentrations of dried distillers grains plus solubles on phosphorus balance in finishing steers. South Dakota beef report, South Dakota State University, Brookings, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman PM, Rosen CJ (1994) Phosphate and trace metal availability from sewage sludge incinerator ash. J Environ Qual 23:822–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bierman S, Erickson GE, Klopfenstein TJ, Stock RA, Shain DH (1999) Evaluation of nitrogen and organic matter balance in the feedlot as affected by level and source of dietary fiber. J Anim Sci 77:1645–1653

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell P, Riethmuller G, Collins M (2009) Biochar application to soil. In: Lehmanne J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 206–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnardeaux J (2007) Potential uses for distillers grains. Department of Agriculture and Food, Government of Western Australia, pp 15. Available at http://www.agric.wa.gov.au/content/sust/biofuel/potentialusesgrains042007.pdf. Verified 24 Jan 2011

  • Boydston RA, Collins HP (2008) Response of weeds and ornamental plants to potting soil amended with dried distillers grains. HortScience 43(1):191–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremer VR, Koelsch RK, Massey RE, Erickson GE (2008) Effects of distillers grains and manure management on nutrient management plans and economics. Nebraska beef cattle report, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, pp 66–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell AG (1990) Recycling and disposing of wood ash. Tappi J 73:141–146

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cayuela ML, Oenema O, Kuikman PJ, Bakker RR, Van Groenigen JW (2010) Bioenergy by-products as soil amendments? Implications for carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. GCB Bioenerg 2:201–213. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01055.x

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmanne J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 67–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45(8):629–634. doi:10.1071/sr07109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Codling EE, Chaney RL, Sherwell J (2002) Poultry litter ash as a potential phosphorus source for agricultural crops. J Environ Qual 31:954–961

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cole NA, Clark RN, Todd RW, Richardson CR, Gueye A, Greene LW, McBride K (2005) Influence of dietary crude protein concentration and source on potential ammonia emissions from beef cattle manure. J Anim Sci 83:722–731

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CRFA (2010) Growing beyond oil delivering our energy future: a report card on the Canadian renewable fuels industry. Canadian Renewable Fuels Association (online). Available at http://www.greenfuels.org/uploads/documents/crfareportcardenglish2010final.pdf

  • Curnoe WE, Irving DC, Dow CB, Velema G, Unc A (2006) Effect of spring application of a paper mill soil conditioner on corn yield. Agron J 98:423–429. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De La Torre Ugarte DG, English BC, Jensen K (2007) Sixty billion gallons by 2030: economic and agricultural impacts of ethanol and biodiesel expansion. Am J Agric Econ 89:1290–1295. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01099.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling AM, Bundy LG, Powell JM, Andraski TW (2002) Dairy diet phosphorus effects on phosphorus losses in runoff from land-applied manure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:284–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edmeades DC (2003) The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 66:165–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eghball B (1999) Liming effects of beef cattle feedlot manure or compost. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:2563–2570. doi:10.1080/00103629909370396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eghball B (2002) Soil properties as influenced by phosphorus- and nitrogen-based manure and compost applications. Agron J 94:128–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erich M, Ohno T (1992) Trimetric determination of calcium carbonate equivalence of wood ash. Analyst (Cambridge) 117:993–995

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson GE, Klopfenstein TJ, Adams DC, Rasby RJ (2005) General overview of feeding corn milling co-products to beef cattle. In: Corn processing co-products manual. Nebraska Corn Board and University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Association of American Feed Control Officials Official Publication, Oxford, IN, pp 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • España-Gamboa E, Mijangos-Cortes J, Barahona-Perez L, Dominguez-Maldonado J, Hernandez-Zarate G, Alzate-Gaviria L (2011) Vinasses: characterization and treatments. Waste Manag Res 29:1235–1250. doi:10.1177/0734242X10387313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etiegni L, Campbell AG, Mahler RL (1991) Evaluation of wood ash disposal on agricultural land. I. Potential as a soil additive and liming agent. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 22:243–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fan X, Burton R, Zhou Y (2010) Glycerol (Byproduct of biodiesel production) as a source for fuels and chemicals – mini review. Open Fuel Energy Sci J 3:17–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira S, Moreira NA, Monteiro E (2009) Bioenergy overview for Portugal. Biomass Bioenerg 33:1567–1576. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fountoulakis MS, Manios T (2009) Enhanced methane and hydrogen production from municipal solid waste and agro-industrial by-products co-digested with crude glycerol. Bioresour Technol 100:3043–3047. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.01.016

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fron MJ, Boling JA, Bush LP, Dawson KA (1990) Sulfur and nitrogen metabolism in the bovine fed different forms of supplemental sulfur. J Anim Sci 68:543–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gale ES, Sullivan DM, Cogger CG, Bary AI, Hemphill DD, Myhre EA (2006) Estimating plant-available nitrogen release from manures, composts, and specialty products. J Environ Qual 35:2321–2332. doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0062

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gemtos TA, Chouliaras N, Marakis S (1999) Vinasse rate, time of application and compaction effect on soil properties and durum wheat crop. J Agric Eng Res 73:283–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb DG, Hao X, McAllister TA (2008) Effect of dried distillers’ grains from wheat on diet digestibility and performance of feedlot cattle. Can J Anim Sci 88:659–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B, Haumaier L, Guggenberger G, Zech W (2001) The ‘Terra Preta’ phenomenon: a model for sustainable agriculture in the humid tropics. Naturwissenschaften 88:37–41. doi:10.1007/s001140000193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glycerol Challenge (2007) Available at http://theglycerolchallenge.org

  • Groesbeck CN, McKinney LJ, DeRouchey JM, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Dritz SS et al (2008) Effect of crude glycerol on pellet mill production and nursery pig growth performance. J Anim Sci 86:2228–2236. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-0880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gronowska M, Hoshi S, MacLean H (2009) A review of U.S. and Canadian biomass supply studies. BioResour 4:341–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ham GA, Stock RA, Klopfenstein TJ, Larson EM, Shain DH, Huffman RP (1994) Wet corn distillers byproducts compared with dried corn distillers grains with solubles as a source of protein and energy for ruminants. J Anim Sci 72:3246–3257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao X, Mir PS, Shah MA, Travis GR (2005) Influence of canola and sunflower diet amendments on cattle feedlot manure. J Environ Qual 34:1439–1445. doi:10.2134/jeq2004.0455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao X, Benke MB, Gibb DJ, Stronks A, Travis G, McAllister TA (2009) Effects of dried distillers’ grains with solubles (wheat-based) in feedlot cattle diets on feces and manure composition. J Environ Qual 38:1709–1718. doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris HL, Cupp AS, Roberts AJ, Funston RN (2008) Utilization of soybeans or corn milling by-products in beef heifer development diets. J Anim Sci 86:476–482. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horne PA, Williams PT (1996) Influence of temperature on the products from the flash pyrolysis of biomass. Fuel 75:1051–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi T (2001) Growth promotion of tea trees by putting bamboo charcoal in soil. Paper presented at the international conference on O-cha (Tea) culture and science, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Iswaran V, Hauhri KS, Sen A (1980) Effect of charcoal, coal and peat on the yield of moong, soybean and pea. Soil Biol Biochem 12:191–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins JW, Sweeten JM, Reddell DL (1987) Land application of thin stillage from a grain sorghum feedstock. Biomass 14:245–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishimoto S, Sugiura G (1985) Charcoal as a soil conditioner. Paper presented at the symposium on forest products research, international achievements for the future, CSIR Conference Centre, Pretoria, Republic of South Africa, vol 5, pp 12–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolesárová N, Hutňan M, Špalková V, Lazor M (2010) Biodiesel by-products as potential substrates for biogas production. In: Markoš J (ed) Proceedings of the 37th international conference of Slovak Society of Chemical Engineering, Tatranské Matliare, Slovakia, pp 1126–1139

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejsl JA, Scanlon TM (1996) Evaluation of beneficial use of wood fired boiler ash on oat and bean growth. J Environ Qual 25:950–954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuligowski K, Poulsen TG (2009) Phosphorus leaching from soils amended with thermally gasified piggery waste ash. Waste Manag 29:2500–2508. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.04.004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuligowski K, Poulsen TG, Stoholm P, Pind N, Laursen J (2008) Nutrients and heavy metals distribution in thermally treated pig manure. Waste Manag Res 26:347–354. doi:10.1177/0734242x08090075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2009) Soil quality impacts of residue removal for bioethanol production. Soil Tillage Res 102:233–241. doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lammers PJ, Kerr BJ, Weber TE, Dozier WA, Kidd MT, Bregendahl K, Honeyman MS (2007) Digestible and metabolizable energy of crude glycerol for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 86:602–608. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J (2007) Bio-energy in the black. Front Ecol Environ 5:381–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, da Silva JP, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lithourgidis AS, Matsi T, Barbayiannis N, Dordas CA (2007) Effect of liquid cattle manure on corn yield, composition, and soil properties. Agron J 99:1041–1047. doi:10.2134/agronj2006.0332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luebbe MK, Erickson GE, Klopfenstein TJ, Greenquist MA (2008) Nutrient mass balance and performance of feedlot cattle fed wet distillers grains. Nebraska beef cattle report, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, pp 60–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupwayi NZ, Arshad MA, Azooz RH, Soon YK (2009) Soil microbial response to wood ash or lime applied to annual crops and perennial grass in an acid soil of northwestern Alberta. Can J Soil Sci 89:169–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Van Wambeke M, Carballa M, Verstraete W (2008) Improvement of the anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater in a UASB reactor by co-digestion with glycerol. Biotechnol Lett 30:861–867. doi:10.1007/s10529-007-9617-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire RO, Crouse DA, Hodges SC (2007) Diet modification to reduce phosphorus surpluses: a mass balance approach. J Environ Qual 36:1235–1240. doi:10.2134/jeq2006.0551

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mandre M, Pärn H, Klõšeiko J, Ingerslev M, Stupak I, Kört M, Paasrand K (2010) Use of biofuel ashes for fertilisation of Betula pendula seedlings on nutrient-poor peat soil. Biomass Bioenerg 34:1384–1392. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.04.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsi T, Keramidas VZ (1999) Fly ash application on two acid soils and its effect on soil salinity, pH, B, P and on ryegrass growth and composition. Environ Pollut 104:107–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarl BA, Peacoke C, Chrisman R, Kung C, Sands RD (2009) Economics of biochar production, utilization and greenhouse gas offsets. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 341–373

    Google Scholar 

  • McKendry P (2002a) Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies. Bioresour Technol 83:47–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKendry P (2002b) Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol 83:37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers NL, Kopecky MJ (1998) Industrial wood ash as a soil amendment for crop production. Tappi J 81:123–130

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikan CJ, Abrams MD (1995) Altered forest composition and soil properties of historic charcoal hearths in southeastern Pennsylvania. Can J Forest Res 25:687–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore AD, Alva AK, Collins HP, Boydston RA (2010) Mineralization of nitrogen from biofuel by-products and animal manures amended to a sandy soil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1315–1326. doi:10.1080/00103621003759320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffari M, Russelle MP, Rosen CJ, Nater EA (2002) Nutrient supply and neutralizing value of alfalfa stem gasification ash. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muse JK, Mitchell CC (1995) Paper mill boiler ash and lime by-product as soil liming materials. Agron J 87:432–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa AF, McKinnon JJ, Christensen DA (2000) The nutritive value of thin stillage and wet distillers’ grains for ruminants: a review. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 13:1609–1618

    Google Scholar 

  • NBB (2010) National Biodiesel Board. Biodiesel: America’s advanced biofuel. Available at: http://www.biodiesel.org/resources/sustainability/pdfs/Advance_Biofuel_Webinar_20100827.pdf. Verified 25 Jan 2011

  • N’Dayegamiye A (2006) Mixed paper mill sludge effects on corn yield, nitrogen efficiency, and soil properties. Agron J 98:1471–1478. doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson KA, Motavalli PP, Smoot RL (2009) Utility of dried distillers grain as a fertilizer source for corn. J Agric Sci 1:3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Noureddini H, Malik M, Byun J, Ankeny A (2009) Distribution of phosphorus compounds in corn processing. Bioresour Technol 100:731–736. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.056

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliari PH, Rosen CJ, Strock JS (2009) Turkey Manure Ash Effects on Alfalfa Yield, Tissue Elemental Composition, and Chemical Soil Properties. Commun Soil Sci and Plant Analy 40:2874–2897.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliari P, Rosen C, Strock J, Russelle M (2010) Phosphorus availability and early corn growth response in soil amended with turkey manure ash. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 41:1369–1382. doi:10.1080/00103621003759379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson SJ, Acharya SN, Thomas JE, Bertschi AB, Rothwell RL (2004) Barley biomass and grain yield and canola seed yield response to land application of wood ash. Agron J 96:971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian P, Schoenau JJ, King T, Fatteicher C (2009) Effect of soil amendment with distillers grain, glycerol and alfalfa powder on soil properties and canola growth. In: Proceedings of the 2009 soils and crops workshop, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 25–26 Feb 2009 (on CD)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rashid MT, Voroney RP (2004) Land application of oily food waste and corn production on amended soils. Agron J 96:997–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausch KD, Belyea RL (2006) The future of coproducts from corn processing. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 128:47–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resende AS, Xavier RP, Oliveira OC, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR, Boddey RM (2006) Long-term effects of pre-harvest burning and nitrogen and vinasse applications on yield of sugar cane and soil carbon and nitrogen stocks on a plantation in Pernambuco, N.E. Brazil. Plant Soil 281:339–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • RFA (2010a) Ethanol industry statistics. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington, DC (online). Available at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/statistics. Verified 25 Jan 2011

  • RFA (2010b) Industry resources: co-products. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington, DC (online). Available at http://www.ethanolrfa.org/pages/industry-resources-coproducts. Verified 25 Jan 2010

  • Rondon MA, Molina D, Hurtado M, Ramirez J, Lehmann J, Major J, Amezquita E (2006) Enhancing the productivity of crops and grasses while reducing greenhouse gas emissions through bio-char amendments to unfertile tropical soils. Paper presented at the 18th world congress of soil science, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Satter LD, Klopfenstein TJ, Erickson GE (2002) The role of nutrition in reducing nutrient output from ruminants. J Anim Sci 80(E.suppl 2):E143–E156

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemenz K, Eichler-Löbermann B (2010) Biomass ashes and their phosphorus fertilizing effect on different crops. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 87:471–482. doi:10.1007/s10705-010-9353-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenau JJ, Davis JG (2006) Optimizing soil and plant responses to land-applied manure nutrients in the Great Plains of North America. Can J Soil Sci 86:587–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer JW, Kohler KA, Liebman M, Richard TL, Cambardella CA, Buhler DD (2004) Tillage and compost affect yield of corn, soybean, and wheat and soil fertility. Agron J 96:531–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VJ, Rausch KD, Yang P, Shapouri H, Belyea RL, Tumbleson ME (2001) Modified dry grind ethanol process publication no. 2001-7021. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, p 43

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh BP, Hatton BJ, Singh B, Cowie AL, Kathuria A (2010) Influence of biochars on nitrous oxide emission and nitrogen leaching from two contrasting soils. J Environ Qual 39:1224–1235. doi:10.2134/jeq2009.0138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiehs MJ, Varel VH (2009) Nutrient excretion and odorant production in manure from cattle fed corn wet distillers grains with solubles. J Anim Sci 87:2977–2984. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1584

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiehs MJ, Whitney MH, Shurson GC (2002) Nutrient database for distiller’s dried grains with solubles produced from new ethanol plants in Minnesota and South Dakota. J Anim Sci 80:2639–2645

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takagi K, Yoshida Y (2003) In situ bioremediation of herbicides simazine-polluted soils in a golf course using degrading bacteria enriched charcoal. Paper presented at the international workshop on material circulation through agro ecosystem in East Asia and assessment of its environmental impact, Tsukuba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JC, He BB (2006) Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl Eng Agric 22:261–265

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Saskatchewan (2009) Bioethanol industry status in Canada. Wheat DDGS – marketing and tech information. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada (online). Available at http://www.ddgs.usask.ca/MarketingandTechInfo/EthanolIndustryStatusinWesternCanada.aspx. Verified 25 Jan 2011

  • van Haandel AC, Catunda PFC (1994) Profitability increase of alcohol distilleries by the rational use of byproducts. Water Sci Technol 29:117–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zwieten L, Kimber S, Downie A, Chan KY, Cowie A, Wainberge R, Morris S (2007) Papermill char: benefits to soil health and plant production. Paper presented at the proceedings of the conference of the international agrichar initiative, Terrigal, NSW, Australia, 30 Apr–2 May 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zwieten L, Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Chan KY (2009) Biochar and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 227–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA, Zachrisson O, Nilsson MC (1998) The charcoal effect in Boreal forests: mechanisms and ecological consequence. Oecologia 115:419–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanai Y, Toyota K, Okazaki M (2007) Effects of charcoal addition on N2O emissions from soil resulting from rewetting air-dried soil in short-term laboratory experiments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53:181–188. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00123.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdani SS, Gonzalez R (2007) Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18:213–219. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2007.05.002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled D. Alotaibi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alotaibi, K.D., Schoenau, J.J. (2012). Biofuel Production Byproducts as Soil Amendments. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Organic Fertilisation, Soil Quality and Human Health. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4113-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics