Abstract
Since being introduced nearly a decade ago, the use of instant response systems (IRS) (also referred to as a “clicker”) has been extensively adopted on college campuses, and is particularly popular among instructors of large lecture classes. The available evidence supports that IRS offers a promising avenue for future developments in pedagogy, though findings on advantages of effective use of IRS in relation to improving or enhancing student learning are inconclusive. Considering this unique attribute of IRS, the main purpose of the present study aims to examine the degree to which students perceive or believe that using IRS in class has an effect on their understanding of course content, engagement in classroom learning, and preparation to take class tests. Moreover, multiple student performance evaluation results are used to explore correlations between student perceptions of IRS and their actual learning outcomes. This chapter presents 151 undergraduate students’ learning experiences of a basic chemistry class incorporating IRS as an in-class assessment tool at National Chung Hsing University in Taiwan. Based on research findings, overall student perceptions on the use of IRS in class were positive. In addition, certain interactions between students’ perceptions on IRS use and their performance in learning basic chemistry were identified in the present study. Although students’ perceived benefits and effectiveness of IRS use are revealed, the research indicates that further studies are needed to probe what specifically about the use of IRS contributes to certain learning outcomes of a large chemistry class in higher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrahamson, L. (2006). A brief history of networked classrooms: Effects, cases, pedagogy, and implications. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases (pp. 1–25). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Barnett, J. (2006). Implementation of personal response units in every large lecture classes: Student perceptions. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 474–494.
Blackman, M. S., Dooley, P., Kuchinski, B., & Chapman, D. (2002). It worked a different way. College Teaching, 50, 27–28.
Burnstein, R. A., & Lederman, L. M. (2006). The use and evolution of an audience response system. In D. A. Banks (Ed.), Audience response systems in higher education: Applications and cases (pp. 40–52). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. CBE-Life Science Education, 6, 9–20.
Chen, T., & Chen, T. (2006). Examination of attitudes towards teaching online courses based on theory of reasoned action of university faculty in Taiwan. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 683–693.
Copas, G. M., & Del Valle, S. (2004). Where’s my clicker? Bringing the remote into the classroom-Part II. Usability News, 6.
Crossgrove, K., & Curran, K. L. (2008). Using clickers in non-majors and majors-level biology courses: Student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7, 146–154.
Eilks, I., & Byers, B. (2010). The need for innovative methods of teaching and learning chemistry in higher education: Reflections from a project of the European Chemistry Thematic Network. Chemistry Educational Research Practice, 11, 233–240.
Fies, C., & Marshall, J. (2006). Classroom response systems: A review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(1), 101–109.
Fitch, J. L. (2004). Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52, 71–81.
Hall, R. H., Collier, H. L., Thomas, M. L., & Hilgers, M. G. (2005, August). A student response system for increasing engagement, motivation, and learning in high enrollment chemistry lectures. Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE.
Hansen, C. R. (2007). An evaluation of a student response system used at Brigham Young University. Unpublished masters thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT. Retrieved June 13, 2008 from http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/ETD/image/etd2127.pdf
Hoffman, C., & Goodwin, S. (2006). A clicker for your thoughts: Technology for active learning. New Library World, 107(9/10), 422–433.
Judson, E., & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21(2), 167–181.
Latessa, R., & Mouw, D. (2005). Use of an audience response system to augment interactive learning. Family Medicine, 37, 12–14.
MacArthur, J. R., & Jones, L. L. (2008). A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classroom. Chemistry Educational Research Practice, 9, 187–195.
MacGeorge, E. L., Homan, S. R., Dunning, J. B., Jr., Elmore, D., Bodie, G. D., Evans, E., Khichadia, S., Lichti, S. M., Feng, B., & Geddes, B. (2008). Student evaluation of audience response technology in large lecture classes. Educational Technology Research Development, 56, 125–145.
Orzechowski, R. F. (1995). Factors to consider before introducing active learning into a large, lecture based course. Journal of College Science Teaching, 24(5), 347–349.
Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. CBE-Life Science Education, 6(1), 29–41.
Reay, N. W., Li, P., & Bao, L. (2008). Testing a new voting machine question methodology. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 171–178.
Rice, R. E., & Bunz, U. (2006). Evaluating a wireless course feedback system: The role of demographics, expertise, fluency, competency, and usage. Studies in Media and Information Literacy Education, 6(3), 1–23.
Sharma, M. D., Khachan, J., Chan, B., & O’Byrne, J. (2005). An investigation of the effectiveness of electronic classroom communication systems in large lecture classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(2), 137–154.
Stuart, S. A. J., Brown, M. I., & Draper, S. W. (2004). Using an electronic voting system in logic lectures: One practitioner’s application. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 95–102.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, TL., Lin, YF., Liu, YL., Yueh, HP., Sheen, HJ., Lin, WJ. (2013). Integrating Instant Response System (IRS) as an In-Class Assessment Tool into Undergraduate Chemistry Learning Experience: Student Perceptions and Performance. In: Chiu, MH., Tuan, HL., Wu, HK., Lin, JW., Chou, CC. (eds) Chemistry Education and Sustainability in the Global Age. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4860-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4860-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4859-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4860-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)