Skip to main content

Ultimate Complexity: A Hindu Process Theology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities
  • 2341 Accesses

Abstract

This paper will present an overview of a Hindu process theology. The specific problem it will address, utilizing this theological model, is whether there is only one ultimate reality, or more than one. A source of recent controversy among process thinkers is the approach to religious pluralism that has been developed by John Cobb and David Ray Griffin. This approach operates with the idea that there is more than one ultimate reality. But does this not contradict the very notion of what an ultimate reality is? Or do Cobb and Griffin use an understanding of the term ultimate different from conventional understandings? This paper will suggest that Cobb’s and Griffin’s basic thesis can be preserved with the idea of a single, but internally complex, ultimate reality, and that this concept is available from within the Vedānta tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hick has presented his “pluralistic hypothesis” in a number of works published throughout the course of his long and distinguished career. The most thorough and complete statement of his perspective, I think, is that presented in his Gifford Lectures, published as An Interpretation of Religion (Hick 1989).

  2. 2.

    I should probably note, too, that when I use the term “universe” in this essay I am referring to the totality of that which is, both possible and actual, and not to the universe in the sense of scientific cosmology–the roughly 14 billion year old expanding product of the Big Bang, which may only be one of many of its kind. Better terms might be “cosmos,” “multiverse,” or “reality”–or better yet, the Sanskrit tattva, or “that which is.”

  3. 3.

    This has been the case in a number of my writings on the topics of Hindu process theology and religious pluralism, the primary statement of which is my first book (Long 2007).

  4. 4.

    This is the main function of God as personified by Viṣṇu, the preserver of the cosmic order from the forces of chaos, or adharma, themselves personified as various demonic beings that Viṣṇu must combat.

  5. 5.

    John Cobb, personal communication.

References

  • Griffin, David Ray. 2001. Reenchantment without supernaturalism: A process philosophy of religion. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, David Ray. 2005. Deep religious pluralism. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Paul J. 1991. An apology for apologetics: A study in the logic of interreligious dialogue. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, Charles. 1970. Creative synthesis and philosophic method. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, John. 1989. An interpretation of religion. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Jeffery D. 2007. A vision for Hinduism: Beyond Hindu nationalism. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikhilananda, Swami. 2002. The Gospel of Sri Ramakrishna, 7th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth (First published in 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. 1967. Adventures of ideas. New York: The Free Press (First published in 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Alfred North. 1978. Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected Edition). New York: The Free Press (First published in 1929).

    Google Scholar 

Suggested Readings: Process Theology

  • 1.Bracken, Joseph. 2001. The one and the many. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.Cobb, John. 2007. A Christian natural theology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.Cobb Jr., John, and David Ray Griffin (eds.). 1976. Process theology: An introductory exposition. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.Dombrowski, Daniel. 2004. Divine beauty: The aesthetics of Charles Hartshorne. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.Faber, Roland. 2008. God as poet of the world: Exploring process theologies. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.Faber, Roland, and Andrea Stephenson (eds.). 2011. Secrets of becoming. New York: Fordham.

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.Ford, Lewis. 2000. Transforming process theism. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.Griffin, David Ray, and John Cobb Jr. (eds.). 1976. Process theology: An introductory exposition. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.Hartshorne, Charles. 1948. The divine relativity. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.Hartshorne, Charles, and Mohammad Valady (eds.). 1997. The zero fallacy: And other essays in neoclassical philosophy. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.James, William. 2005. A pluralistic universe. Whitefish: Kessinger Publishing, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.Keller, Catherine. 2003. Face of the deep. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.Keller, Catherine. 2008. On the mystery: Discerning God in process. Minneapolis: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • 14.Kraus, Elisabeth. 1998. The metaphysics of experience. New York: Fordham.

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.Lucas, George. 1989. The rehabilitation of Whitehead. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.McDaniel, Jay, and Donna Bowman (eds.). 2006. Handbook of process theology. Atlanta: Chalice.

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.Mesle, Robert. 1993. Process theology. Atlanta: Chalice.

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.Mesle, Robert. 2008. Process-relational philosophy. West Conshohocken: Templeton Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.Rose, Philip. 2002. On Whitehead. Florence: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.Suchocki, Marjorie. 1988. The end of evil. Albany: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.Suchocki, Marjorie. 1995. God-Christ-Church. New York: Crossroad Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.Viney, Don. 1985. Charles Hartshorne and the existence of God. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.Weber, Michel. 2006. Whitehead’s pancreativism. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.Whitehead, Alfred North. 1979. Process and reality (Corrected Edition). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffery D. Long .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Long, J.D. (2013). Ultimate Complexity: A Hindu Process Theology. In: Diller, J., Kasher, A. (eds) Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics