Skip to main content

From “Free” Trade to Farm Women: Gender and the Neoliberal Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research, Action and Policy: Addressing the Gendered Impacts of Climate Change

Abstract

This chapter challenges the economism of contemporary macroeconomic policy through an environmental and gendered lens. It uses a feminist political economy framework to analyze newly released statistical data on international trade flows from the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), as well as statistics on Canadian agricultural production. The analysis moves through three levels of inquiry – macro, meso, and micro – to examine the interaction of neoliberal policy, gender, and environment. At the macro level, it questions the neoliberal discourse of “efficiency” by using trade data to illustrate the environmental inefficiencies of the current trade regime, especially the phenomenon of “trade for trade’s sake”. It links the neoliberal policy regime to its environmental consequences at the meso level of Canadian agricultural production. Finally, the gendered effects of neoliberalism are illustrated by examining the situation of Canadian farm women. Although macro-level policies are often portrayed as “gender neutral”, their unique effects on farm women’s lives are elucidated using the concept of social reproduction.

This chapter is based on a paper presented at the “Gender and Climate Change: Women, Research, and Action” conference, 16 September 2011, at Monash University in Prato, Italy. The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and the Regina Public Interest Research Group (RPIRG).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Stirling (2001) has defined the “family farm” as “a type of farming in which families own all or most of their productive capital – land, buildings, machinery, and livestock – and do all or most of the productive work themselves. Typically they live in the communities where they farm, their farms are not large, and there are many of them” (p. 248). In a similar vein, Furtan has defined “commercial farms” in opposition to the family farm, because in a commercial farm “the operator is engaged in less of the ownership, management, risk and/or reward of the farming operation even though farm operators and their families continue to provide the labour to the agricultural production operation” (Furtan 2006, p. 10).

References

  • Alston M (1998) Farm women and their work: why is it not recognized? J Sociol 34(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alston M (2006) The gendered impact of drought. In: Bock BB, Shortall S (eds) Rural gender relations: issues and case studies. CABI, Cambridge, pp 165–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker I (2003) Neo-liberal governance and the reprivatization of social reproduction: social provisioning and shifting gender orders. In: Bakker I, Gill S (eds) Power, production and social reproduction: human in/security in the global political economy. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke/New York, pp 66–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker I, Silvey R (2008) Introduction: social reproduction and global transformations – from the everyday to the global. In: Bakker I, Silvey R (eds) Beyond states and markets: the challenges of social reproduction. Routledge, London/New York, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier CL (2006) NAFTA commission for environmental cooperation: ongoing assessment of trade liberalization in North America. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 24(4):259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission for Environmental Cooperation (CEC) (2011) Destination sustainability: reducing greenhouse gas emissions from freight transportation in north America. CEC, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmarais A (2007) La via campesina: globalization and the power of peasants. Fernwood, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson D, Cagatay N (2000) The social content of macroeconomic policies. World Dev 28(7):1347–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ervin AM, Holtslander C, Qualman D, Sawa R (2003) Introduction. In: Ervin AM, Holtslander C, Qualman D, Sawa R (eds) Beyond factory farming: corporate hog barns and the threat to public health, the environment, and rural communities. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Saskatoon, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Faye L (2006) Redefining ‘farmer’: agrarian feminist theory and the work of Saskatchewan farm women. (Unpublished Master thesis), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (2006, 2008, 2009, 2011) FAOStat. Retrieved August 3, 2011, from http://faostat.fao.org/site/342/default.aspx and http://faostat.fao.org/site/537/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=537

  • Fowke V (1957) The national policy and the wheat economy. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtan H (2006) The need for direction: the Canadian grains sector at a crossroads. Knowledge Impact in Society Publications, Saskatoon

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill S (2005) Conceptualizing the global restructuring of public services: privatization, TRIPS & GATS. Jurid Z im Rechtsstaat 4(3):128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley MM (2004) Market integration in the North American hog industries. United States Department of Agriculture, LDP-M-125-01

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan L, Lawrence RS, Walker P (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 110(5):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe J (2003) Family labour processes, land, and the farm crisis in Saskatchewan. In: Diaz HP, Jaffe J, Stirling R (eds) Farm communities at the crossroads. Canadian Plains Research Center, Regina, pp 137–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe J, Blakley B (1999) Coping as a rural caregiver: the impact of health care reforms on rural women informal caregivers. Prairie Women’s Health Centre of Excellence, Regina

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton J (2002) NAFTA’s trade-environment regime and its commission for environmental cooperation: contributions and challenges ten years on. Can J Reg Sci 25(2) n.p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubik W (2004) The changing roles of farm women and the consequences for their health, well being, and quality of life. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Regina, Regina

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubik W, Fletcher A (Forthcoming) The multiple dimensions of health: weaving together food sustainability and farm women’s health. In: Leipert B, Leach B, Thurston W (eds.) Rural women’s health. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 185–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind C (1995) Something’s wrong somewhere: globalization, community and the moral economy of the farm crisis. Fernwood, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxton M (2007) Family responsibilities: the politics of love and care. In: Lucas LE (ed) Unpacking globalization: markets, gender, and work. Lexington, Lanham/Boulder/New York/Toronto/Plymouth, pp 131–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz DK (2006) Canadian farm women and their families: restructuring, work, and decision making. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride S (2001) Paradigm shift: globalization and the Canadian state. Fernwood Publishing, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne W (2005) Changing climate, uncertain future: considering rural women in climate change policies and strategies. Can Woman Stud 24(4):49–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg-Hodge H, Merrifield T, Gorelick S (2002) Bringing the food economy home: local alternatives to global agribusiness. Fernwood, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Novek J (2003) Intensive hog farming in Manitoba: transnational treadmills and local conflicts. Can Rev Sociol Anthropol 40(1):3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr DE, Shen Y (2006) World pig production: opportunity or threat?. Paper presented at the Indiana Farm Bureau’s Midwest Swine Nutrition Conference, Indiana, 2006. http://www.thepigsite.com/articles/2/ai-genetics-reproduction/1857/world-pig-production-opportunity-or-threat

  • Panitch L, Gindin S (2009) The current crisis: a socialist perspective. Stud Pol Econ 83:7–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras J, Veltmeyer H (2001) Globalization unmasked: imperialism in the 21st century. Fernwood, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips EJ (1998) The social and cultural construction of farming practice: ‘good’ farming in two New South Wales communities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Charles Sturt University, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Safety Canada (n.d.) Canadian disaster database. Retrieved from http://cdd.publicsafety.gc.ca/srchpg-eng.aspx?dynamic=false.

  • Qualman D (2001) Corporate hog farming: the view from the family farm. In: Epp R, Whitson D (eds) Writing off the rural west: globalization, governments, and the transformation of rural communities. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, pp 21–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauchyn D, Kulshreshtha S (2008) Prairies. In: Lemmen D, Warren F, Bush E, Lacroix J (eds) From impacts to adaptation: Canada in a changing climate 2007. Government of Canada, Ottawa, pp275–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields J, Evans BM (1998) Shrinking the state: globalization and public administration “reform”. Fernwood, Halifax

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Club, Holbrook-White S (2000) NAFTA transportation corridors: approaches to assessing environmental impacts and alternatives. In: Proceedings from the North American symposium on understanding the linkages between trade and environment, Washington, DC. Accessed at http://www.cce.cec.org/programs_projects/trade_environ_econ/pdfs/sierra.pdf

  • Statistics Canada (2006a) The financial picture of farms in Canada. 2006 Census of Agriculture Highlights and Analyses. Statistics Canada, Ottawa. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ca-ra2006/articles/finpicture-portrait-eng.htm

  • Statistics Canada (2006b) Snapshot of Canadian agriculture. 2006 Census of Agriculture Highlights and Analyses. Statistics Canada, Ottawa. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/ca-ra2006/articles/snapshot-portrait-eng.htm

  • Statistics Canada, Statistics and Data Development Unit (n.d. a) Table 1: exports of pork and live hogs, Alberta and Canada. Retrieved from Alberta agriculture at http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sdd11840/$FILE/table 1.pdf

  • Statistics Canada, Statistics and Data Development Unit (n.d. b) Table 15: Canadian exports of live hogs by province. Retrieved from Alberta agriculture at http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sdd11840/$FILE/table 15.pdf

  • Statistics Canada, Statistics and Data Development Unit (n.d. c) Table 23: Canadian exports of live hogs by country. Retrieved from Alberta agriculture at http://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sdd11840/$FILE/table 22-23.pdf

  • Stirling B (2001) Work, knowledge, and the direction of farm life. In: Epp R, Whitson D (eds) Writing off the rural west: globalization, governments, and the transformation of rural communities. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, pp 247–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait F (2003) Pork, politics, and power. In: Ervin AM, Holtslander C, Qualman D, Sawa R (eds) Beyond factory farming: corporate hog barns and the threat to public health, the environment, and rural communities. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Saskatoon, pp 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Thu K (2003) Industrial agriculture, democracy, and the future. In: Ervin AM, Holtslander C, Qualman D, Sawa R (eds) Beyond factory farming: corporate hog barns and the threat to public health, the environment, and rural communities. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Saskatoon, pp 9–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore S (1991) Farming women: gender, work and family enterprise. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe N (1995) Farm women: cultivating hope and sowing change. In: Burt S, Code L (eds) Changing methods: feminists transforming practice. Broadview Press, Peterborough, pp137–163

    Google Scholar 

  • World Trade Organization (1999) Trade and environment, vol 4, Special Studies. WTO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Young M (2005) Efficiency of pork production: a USA, Canada, and Ireland Comparison. Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, University of Minnesota, pp. 124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber J. Fletcher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fletcher, A.J. (2013). From “Free” Trade to Farm Women: Gender and the Neoliberal Environment. In: Alston, M., Whittenbury, K. (eds) Research, Action and Policy: Addressing the Gendered Impacts of Climate Change. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5518-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics