Abstract
As climate mitigation efforts transform the value of carbon with institutions creating incentives as well as regulating markets, avoiding unintended consequences becomes challenging. Life Cycle Inventory and Analysis (LCI/LCA) research tracks carbon and other services from the forest to products including displacement of fossil emissions when wood substitutes for fossil fuels or fossil intensive products. Incentives that do not target uses that displace the most emissions will likely steal the feedstock from less effective uses, increasing rather than decreasing emissions. We apply life cycle research to identify leverage points in reducing carbon emissions and their impact on old forest habitat as the ecosystem value most likely threatened by carbon mitigation incentives. Ethanol subsidies, forest carbon credits, and renewable energy standards steal the feedstock from higher leverage uses, while a carbon tax effectively penalizes the largest emitters. Either carbon taxes or incentives will affect the cost of sustaining critical habitat. Institutions need to consider life cycle implications to sustain forests and their multiple values. While a carbon tax provides the proper price signal with the highest reward for the greatest carbon emission reduction, increasing habitat values may be justified to support the production, maintenance and restoration of important habitat.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams AB, Harrison RB et al (2005) Nitrogen-fertilization impacts on carbon sequestration and flux in managed coastal Douglas fir stands of the Pacific Northwest. For Ecol Manage 220(1–3):313–325
Agee JK, Skinner CN (2005) Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For Ecol Manage 211(1–2):83–96
Bonnicksen TM (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from four California wildfires: opportunities to prevent and reverse environmental and climate impacts. FCEM Rpt No 2, Forest Foundation, Auburn CA, p 18
Bormann BT, Homann PS, Darbyshire RL, Morrissette BA (2008) Intense forest wildfire sharply reduces mineral soil C and N: the first direct evidence. Can J For Res 38:2771–2783
Briggs D, Trobaugh J (2001) Management practices on Westside industrial forest lands. 1991–2000: with projections to 2005. SMC working chapter no. 2. Stand management cooperative, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, p 71
Carey AB, Lippke BR, Sessions J (1999) Intentional ecosystems management: managing forests for biodiversity. J Sustain For 9(3/4):83–125
CORRIM (1998) Environmental performance research priorities: wood products. Final report on the research plan to develop environmental performance measures for renewable building materials with alternatives for improved performance. Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM, Inc.) DOE Agreement No. DE-FC07-96ID13427, Subcontract 417346
Department of Natural Resources [DNR] (2004) A desirable forest health program for Washington’s forests. Forest Health Strategy Work Group Report. Olympia, WA, p 63
Friedlingstein P, Houghton RA, Marland G, Hackler J, Boden TA, Conway TJ, Canadell JG, Raupach MR, Ciais P, Quere CL (2010) Update on CO2 emissions. Nat Geosci. Published online: 21 Nov 2010. doi:10.1038/ngeo1022
Gehringer KR (2006) Structure-based nonparametric target definition and assessment procedures with an application in riparian forest management. For Ecol Manage 223(1–3):125–138
Gustavsson L, Sathre R (2006) Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials. Build Environ 41(7):940–951
Gustavsson L, Pingoud K, Sathre R (2006) Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: comparing concrete- and wood-framed buildings. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11(3):667–691
Johnson DH, O’Neil TA (2001) Wildlife-habitat relationships in Oregon and Washington. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis
Lippke B, Wilson J, Bowyer J, Perez-Garcia J, Bowyer J, Meil J (2004) CORRIM: life cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. For Prod J 54(6):8–20
Lippke B, Zobrist K, Ceder K (2007a) Issues and alternatives associated with private forest wildlife and riparian habitat management. In: USDA forest service Pacific Northwest research station general technical report PNW-GTR-695, pp 81–94
Lippke B, Zobrist K, Mason CL (2007b) Templates for forest sustainability on the olympic experimental state forests. RTI working paper 7. Rural Technology Initiative, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
Lippke B, Comnick J, Mason L, Stokes B (2008) Impacts of thinning intensity and implementation schedules on fire, carbon storage, and economics in woody biomass utilization: challenges and opportunities. For Prod J Publ 7223:47–59
Lippke B, Wilson J, Meil J, Taylor A (2010) Characterizing the Importance of carbon stored in wood products. Wood Fiber Sci 42:5–14
Mason L, Ceder K, Rogers H, Bloxton T, Comnick J, Lippke B, McCarter J, Zorist K (2003) Investigation of alternative strategies for design, layout and administration of fuel removal projects. Rural Technology Initiative, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, p 78
Mason L, Lippke B, Zobrist K, Bloxton T, Ceder K, Comnick J, McCarter J, Rogers H (2006) Investment in fuel removals to avoid fires result in substantial benefits. J For 104(1):27–31
Mason CL, Gustafson R, Calhoun J, Lippke B, Raffaeli N (2009) Wood to energy in Washington: imperatives, opportunities, and obstacles to progress. Report to Washington Legislature. School of Forest Resources, College of the Environment, University of Washington
McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote P (2004) Climate change, wildfire, and conservation. Conserv Biol 18(4):890–908
Nordhaus W (2001) Global warming economics. Science 294(5545):1283–1284
NREL, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2003 and 2009) U.S. LCI database project—phase I final report. Available on http://www.nrel.gov.lci/ Accessed on 15 April 2009
Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) Forest stand dynamics. McGraw Hill, New York, p 410
Oneil E, Lippke B (2009) Eastern Washington biomass accessibility. Report to Washington Legislature, School of Forest Resources, College of the Environment, University of Washington, p 44
Oneil E, Lippke B (2010) Integrating products, emission offsets, and wildfire into carbon assessments of inland northwest forests. Wood Fiber Sci 42:144–164
Perez-Garcia JB, Lippke D, Briggs J, Wilson J, Bowyer J, Meil J (2005a) The environmental performance of renewable building materials in the context of residential construction. Wood Fiber Sci 37(1):3–17
Perez-Garcia J, Lippke B, Comnick J, Manriquez C (2005b) An assessment of carbon pools, storage, and products market substitution using life-cycle analysis results. Wood and Fiber Sci l37:140–148
Robbins A, Perez-Garcia J (2005) Consumer willingness to pay for renewable building materials: an experimental choice analysis and survey. Center for International Trade in Forest Products, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, p 65
Sathre R, O’Connor J (2009) A synthesis of research on wood products and greenhouse gas impacts. Forest innovations—forintek division, TR-19. ISBN: 978-0-86488-540-1, Vancouver
Sissine F (2007) Energy independence and security act of 2007: a summary of major provisions. CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service, Energy and Natural Resources Committee, Washington. Available online: http://energy.senate.gov/public/_files/RL342941.pdf.Accessed on 11 Oct 2011
Skog K, Heath L, Smith J, Miner R, Upton B, Unwin J, Maltby V (2008) The greenhouse gas and carbon profile of the U.S. forest products sector. National council for air and stream improvement, special report no: 08-05 Sept 2008, p 32. Also in Environ. Sci. Technol 2010, 44:3999–4005
Talbert C, Marshall D (2005) Plantation productivity in the Douglas-fir region under intensive silvicultural practices: results from research and operations. J Forest 103(2):65–70
Taylor A, Lippke B, Park W (2009) Carbon credit schemes for forest landowners are counterproductive. Environ Sci Policy 10:1011
Winistorfer P, Chen Z, Lippke B, Stevens N (2005) Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to the use, maintenance and disposal of a residential structure. Wood Fiber Sci Special Issue 37(5):128–139
Xu W, Lippke B, Perez-Garcia J (2003) Valuing biodiversity, aesthetics and job losses associated with ecosystem management using stated preferences. For Sci 49(2):247–257
Zobrist KW, Lippke BR (2007) Economic costs of different riparian management regulations in the Pacific Northwest. West J Appl For 22(1):36–41
Zobrist KW, Hinckley TM, Andreu MG, Gehringer KR, Hedman CW, Lippke BR (2005) Templates for forest sustainability on intensively managed private forests. RTI working paper 5, Rural Technology Initiative, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, p 106
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lippke, B., Oneil, E., Zobrist, K. (2013). Economics of Multiple Forest Values and Life Cycle Analysis. In: Kant, S. (eds) Post-Faustmann Forest Resource Economics. Sustainability, Economics, and Natural Resources, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5778-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5778-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5777-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5778-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)