Skip to main content

Mites and Biological Diversity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mites: Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour

Abstract

‘Ubiquitous’ is a much abused adjective that literally means ‘being everywhere’ but in practice it means considerably less. The word is often trotted out by ecologists and systematists to justify their working on a particular group of plants or animals (e.g. ‘rodents make good bioindicators because they are ubiquitous in terrestrial ecosystems’), sometimes with little support for their assertions. However, mites have a fair claim for being truly omnipresent (Fig. 11.1). With the exception of the water column of the open ocean, they exist in every sort of aquatic, terrestrial, arboreal and parasitic habitat. In spite of this, mites rarely appear in general biodiversity surveys (but see Basset et al. 2012). Data on mite diversity in tropical ecosystems is especially rare. Two interrelated reasons for this neglect, shared with other ubiquitous and ‘hyper-diverse’ taxa such as nematodes, are small body size and alleged difficulty of identification. Small-bodied organisms are often overlooked in rapid assessments of biodiversity, particularly when samples are sorted with the naked eye. Even if mites are seen, it is almost impossible to identify them to species in the field; instead, maceration, slide-mounting and microscopic examination are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Basset, Y., & 37 others. (2012). Arthropod diversity in a tropical forest. Science, 338, 1481–1484. doi:10.1126/science.1226727.

  • Brown, J. M., & Wilson, D. S. (1994). Poecilochirus carabi: Behavioral and life-history adaptations to different hosts and the consequences of geographical shifts in host communities. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 1–22). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994). Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 345, 101–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, R. K., & Naeem, S. (1994). Life-history patterns of hummingbird flower mites in relation to host phenology and morphology. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and evolutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 23–44). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort, G. C. (1994). Evolution and life-history patterns of mites associated with bees. In M. A. Houck (Ed.), Mites: Ecological and volutionary analyses of life-history patterns (pp. 218–251). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faris, J. A. (1996). The paradoxes of Zeno. Sydney: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, P. M. (1992). Species inventory. In B. Groombridge (Ed.), Global biodiversity: Status of the earth’s living resources (pp. 17–39). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, R. L., Bergelson, J. M., Lowman, M. D., McIntyre, S., & Carruthers, G. (1993). The biodiversity of arthropods from Australian rainforest canopies: General introduction, methods, sites and ordinal results. Australian Journal of Ecology, 18, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovalenko, K. E., Thomaz, S. M., & Warfe, D. M. (2012). Habitat complexity: Approaches and future directions. Hydrobiologia, 685, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, E. E., with contributions by Ainscough, B. D., Clulow, F. V., Funk, R. C., Marshall, V. G., Nesbitt, H. H. J., OConnor, B. M., Smith, I. M., & Wilkinson, P. R. (1979). Acari. In H. V. Danks (Ed.), Canada and its insect fauna (Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, Vol. 108, pp. 252–263, 267–284).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loder, N., Blackburn, T. M., & Gaston, K. J. (1997). The slippery slope: Towards an understanding of the body size frequency distribution. Oikos, 78, 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1978). The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas. In L. A. Mound & N. Waloff (Eds.), Diversity of insect faunas (pp. 188–204). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1988). How many species are there on earth? Science, 241, 1441–1449.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OConnor, B. M. (1990). The North American Acari: Current status and future projections. In M. Kosztarab & C. W. Schaefer (Eds.), Systematics of the North American insects and arachnids: Status and needs (Virginia agricultural experiment station information series 90–1, pp. 21–29). Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez, T. M. (1996). The eggs of seven species of Fainalges Gaud and Berla (Xolalgidae) from the green conure (Aves, Psittacidae). In R. Mitchell, D. J. Horn, G. R. Needham & W. C. Welbourn (Eds.), Acarology IX: Volume 1, Proceedings (pp. 297–300). Columbus: Ohio Biological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, S. D., Beck, M. W., & Dodson, G. N. (1995). Why do male crab spiders drink nectar? Animal Behaviour, 49, 1443–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, H. C., Kanowski, J., Wardell-Johnson, G., Reis, T., & Catterall, C. P. (2003). Does diversity beget diversity? A comparison between plant and leaf-litter invertebrate richness from pasture to rainforest. Records of the South Australian Museum Monograph Series, 7, 267–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, A. S. L., & Brooks, T. M. (2007). Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: The effectiveness of surrogates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 713–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, O. D. (2000). The immature life stages of the Fedrizziidae (Mesostigmata: Fedrizzioidea). Acarologia, 41, 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, O. D. (2002). Mites and passalid beetles: Diversity, taxonomy and biogeography. Ph.D. thesis. The University of Queensland (p. 339).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, O. D. (2007). Revision of the Fedrizziidae (Acari: Mesostigmata: Fedrizzioidea). Zootaxa, 1480, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeman, O. D., Proctor, H., Norton, R. A., & Colloff, M. (2001). Myriad Mesostigmata associated with log-inhabiting arthropods. In R. B. Halliday & D. E. Walter (Eds.), Acarology: Proceedings of the 10th International Congress. Canberra: CSIRO Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N. L. (1979). Patterns of species diversity in temperate and tropical litter mites. Ecology, 60, 295–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tr Treat, A. E. (1975). Mites of moths and butterflies. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D. E., & O’Dowd, D. J. (1995). Beneath biodiversity: Factors influencing the diversity and abundance of canopy mites. Selbyana, 16, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D. E., & Proctor, H. C. (1998). Predatory mites in tropical Australia: Local species richness and complementarity. Biotropica, 30, 72–81. [this is cited as 1998b in the text, but should just be 1998]

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D. E., & Proctor, H. C. (1999). Mites: Ecology, evolution and behaviour (p. 322). Wallingford: University of NSW Press, Sydney and CABI. ISBN 0 86840 529 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D. E., Latonas S., & Byers, K. (2013). Almanac of Alberta Oribatida. Part 1. Ver. 2.3. Edmonton: The Royal Alberta Museum. http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/natural/insects/research/research.htm.

  • Walter, D. E., Seeman, O., Rodgers, D., & Kitching, R. L. (1998b). Mites in the mist: How unique is a rainforest canopy knockdown fauna? Australian Journal of Ecology, 23, 501–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, D. E., Lindquist, E. E., Smith, I. M., Cook, D. R., & Krantz, G. M. (2009). Order Trombidiformes. In G. W. Krantz & D. E. Walter (Eds.), A manual of acarology (3rd ed., pp. 233–420). Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, D. H. (1993). Spiders in ecological webs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M. R., Behan-Pelletier, V. M., & Hebert, P. D. N. (2012). Revealing the hyperdiverse mite fauna of subarctic Canada through DNA barcoding. PLoS One, 7, e48755. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Walter, D.E., Proctor, H.C. (2013). Mites and Biological Diversity. In: Mites: Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7164-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics