Abstract
At this time in history, it is still noteworthy when a woman is appointed a leader, since they remain outnumbered by men in equivalent positions. To what extent does high impact leadership have to do with gender? Or race for that matter as in the case of Barack Obama, the President of the United States? In his case, it impedes him for championing the cause of blacks over whites. The Australian Prime Minister has made gender an issue and although received international acclaim in 2011 this has not been sustained. By Obama achieving the status of President means that he has bridged that chasm for marginal groups at least in principle. Can the same be said in the case of a woman president or prime minister? Who is included and excluded in top governance and management circles is a source of continuous speculation.
“For most of history, Anonymous was a woman.”
Virginia Woolf 1882–1941
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In a search for scholarly articles on leadership in Business source premier returns, there were16,922 works between 1915 and 2012, which means about 0.4 % of works on leadership compared male and female leadership.
- 2.
If that were so, board membership of women would have risen dramatically and quickly after the first women were appointed to the Boards. This has not been evident and will be discussed below.
- 3.
Fierce and stubborn attitude.
Bibliography
Beaman, L., Chattopadhyay, R., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2009). Powerful women: Does exposure reduce bias? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1497–1540.
Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Women in management: Delusions of progress. Harvard Business Review, 88(3), 19–21.
Catalyst. (1996). Women in corporate leadership: Progress and prospects. New York: Catalyst.
Catalyst. (2001a). Women in financial services: The word on the street. New York: Catalyst.
Catalyst. (2001b). Women in law: Making the case. New York: Catalyst.
Catalyst. (2004). Women and men in U.S. corporate leadership: Same workplace different realities? New York: Catalyst.
Catalyst. (2012). Women on boards. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/433/women-on-boards
Davis, L. (2011). Women on board. Retrieved from www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/business…/11-745-women-on-boards.pdf
Doherty, L., & Manfedi, S. (2006). Women’s Progression to senior positions in English universities. Employee Relations, 28(6), 553–572.
Eagly, A., Makhijani, M., & Klonsky, B. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3–22.
Ely, R., & Rhode, D. (2010). Women and leadership: Defining the challenges. In N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), Advancing leadership. Boston: HBS Publishing.
Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2011). Sex and power report 2011. Retrieved from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/key-projects/sexandpower/
Francesco, A., & Gold, B. A. (2005). International organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford University Press.
Greer, G. (2010, June 28). Pragmatism rules over principles for Julia Gillard, Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/pragmatism-rules-over-principles-for-julia-gillard/story-e6frf7jo-1225884959701
Helfat, C. E., Harris, D., & Wolfson, P. J. (2006). The pipeline to the top: Women and men in the top executive ranks of U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 43–64.
Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80–85.
Javidan, M., & House, R. J. (2002). Leadership and cultures around the world: Findings from GLOBE: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 1–2.
Jin, Y. (2010). Emotional leadership as a key dimension of public relations leadership: A national survey of public relations leaders. Journal of Public Relations Research, 22(2), 159–181.
Jonnergård, K., Stafsudd, A., & Elg, U. (2010). Performance evaluations as gender barriers in professional organizations: A study of auditing firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(6), 721–747.
Joy, L., Carter, N. M., Wagener, H. M., & Narayanan, S. (2007). The bottom line: Corporate performance and women’s representation on boards. New York: Catalyst.
Kenny, O. (1995). Placements in management training for Bangladeshi civil servants. Women in Management Review, 10(4), 11–16.
Konrad, A., & Kramer, V. (2006). How many women do boards need? Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 22–27.
Krishnan, H. A., Park, D., & Kilbourne, L. (2006). The development of a conceptual model to explain turnover among women in top management teams. International Journal of Management, 23(3), 470–477.
Kulich, C., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Where is the romance for women leaders? The effects of gender on leadership attributions and performance-based pay. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(4), 582–601.
Laff, M. (2007). The invisible wall. T+D, 61(3), 32–38.
Martell, R. F., Parker, C., & Emrich, C. G. (1998). Sex stereotyping in the executive suite: “Much ado about something”. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 13, 127–138.
McKinsey & Company. (2007). Women matter: Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver. Retrieved from www.europeanpwn.net/files/mckinsey_2007_gender_matters.pdf
McNamee, S. J., & Miller, R. K. (2004). The meritocracy myth. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
Mctiernan, S., & Flynn, P. (2011). “Perfect storm” on the horizon for women business school deans. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(2), 323–339.
Scott, K. (2006). Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organisational Behaviour and Decision Processes, 101(2), 230–242.
Simpson, R. (2006). Masculinity and management education: Feminizing the MBA. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 182–193.
Schein, V. E. (2007). Women in management: Reflections and projections. Women in Management Review, 22(1), 6–18.
Soares, R., Combopiano, J., Regis, A., Shur, Y., & Wong, R. (2010). 2010 Catalyst census: Fortune 500 women executive officers and top earners. Retrieved from http://www.catalyst.org/publication/459/2010-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-executive-officers-and-top-earners
Background Readings
Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103.
Ely, R., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. (2011, September). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women's leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10(3), 474–493.
Ryan, M., & Halsam, S. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brewer, A.M. (2014). Gendered Leadership. In: Leadership, Coaching and Followership. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7463-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7463-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7462-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7463-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)