Abstract
Having considered all four vitae separately, a comparative synopsis is now in order. The question is why the four biographers – Sassolo da Prato, Francesco da Castiglione, Bartolomeo Sacchi named Platina, and Francesco Prendilacqua – took it upon themselves to write a vita of their teacher, Vittorino da Feltre. The answer can be given at various levels of justification, each of which is based on different traditions or can be explained by different customs. The text-extrinsic level of reality provides initial information about the external reasons that a given author might have for writing his manuscript, including the possibility of performing a service through the production of the text. From today’s perspective, this alone might be motivation enough for its composition. Among the texts under consideration here, we find Sassolo’s “promotional” interests and especially Francesco Prendilacqua’s attempt at procuring a position with the duke of Urbino, Federico da Montefeltro, as examples of this level of justification.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Kessler (1978, pp. 112–113).
- 2.
Ianziti (2012, Kindle Location 177).
- 3.
Ianziti (2012, Kindle Location 619).
- 4.
See Chap. 1.
- 5.
Plutarchus (1470).
- 6.
McLaughlin (2002, p. 38).
- 7.
McLaughlin (2002, p. 41).
- 8.
See Sect. 3.2.
- 9.
Ibid. (pp. 41–42).
- 10.
Vespasiano da Bisticci (1970, 1976, vol. 1, pp. V–VII; pp. 573–580 [vita Victorini]).
- 11.
McLaughlin (2002, p. 55).
- 12.
Ibid. (p. 56).
- 13.
Schmolinsky (2012).
- 14.
- 15.
Fulbrook, Rublack (2010, p. 263).
- 16.
Schmolinsky (2012, pp. 86–117 (letters), pp. 117–129 (biographies with inserted self-testimonies).
- 17.
Chartier (1988).
References
Plutarch. 1470. Campanus Francisco Piccolominio cardinali Senensi meo salutem. Collegi nuper dispersas grecorum latinorumque principum uitas a Plutarcho scriptas grece: a diuersis inde interpretibus latinas factas .. 2 vols. [Roma]: Udalricus Gallus: ne quem poscantur in usum edocuit pennis nil opus esse tuis. Imprimit ille die: quantum non scribitur anno. Ingenio …
Chartier, Roger. 1988. Cultural History between Practices and Representations. Transl. Lydia G. Cochrane. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
Enenkel, Karl A. E. 2008. Die Erfindung des Menschen. Die Autobiographik des frühneuzeitlichen Humanismus von Petrarca bis Lipsius. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Fulbrook, Mary, and Ulinka Rublack. 2010. In Relation: The “Social Self” and Ego-Documents. German History 28: 263–272.
Ianziti, Gary. 2012. Writing history in Renaissance Italy : Leonardo Bruni and the uses of the past. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Kindle Edition.
Kessler, Eckhard. 1978. Petrarca und die Geschichte. München.
McLaughlin, Martin. 2002. Biography and Autobiography in the Italian Renaissance. In Peter France, and William St Clair. eds. Mapping Lives: The Uses of Biography. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
Misch, Georg. 1949–. Geschichte der Autobiographie. 4 parts in 8 vols. Bern: A. Francke.
Schmolinsky, Sabine. 2012. Sich schreiben in der Welt des Mittelalters. Begriffe und Konturen einer mediävistischen Selbstzeugnisforschung. Selbstzeugnisse des Mittelalters und der beginnenden Neuzeit. 4. Bochum: Winkler.
Vespasiano da Bisticci. 1970, 1976. Le Vite. Edizione critica con introduzione e commento di Aulo Greco. 2 vols. Firenze.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goeing, AS. (2014). Between History and Praise: Approaches on Understanding Humanist Biographies. In: Summus Mathematicus et Omnis Humanitatis Pater. Archimedes, vol 33. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7531-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7531-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7530-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7531-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)