Skip to main content

Peer Review for Distance Educators: Two Case Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education

Abstract

Introducing peer review of teaching in any Faculty can be a complex and challenging endeavour at the best of times (Harris et al., Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: A handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices, 2008a), but challenges can multiply in online and distance teaching environments. Although new Australian research is providing much needed resources and framework, the implementation and exploration of online peer observation is still in its infancy (Harris et al., Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: A handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices, 2008 and Harris et al., Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: Resources to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices (Final Project Report), 2008; Wood et al., Peer review of online learning and teaching, 2009; Bennett and Barp, Teaching in Higher Education, 2008, p. 559–570). One Australian Higher Education Provider is exploring initiatives in both online and distance peer review with positive outcomes. Within a selection of Think Education Group’s online offerings, two formative, developmental peer review programs have been introduced to support educators as they share ideas about their respective teaching practices. This paper reports on the different processes, outcomes and lessons learnt from these case studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, A., Croft, W., Irons, R., Cuffe, N., Bandara, W., & Rowntree, P. (2011). Peer partnership to enhance scholarship of teaching: A case study. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(4), 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., Mladenovic, R., & Segara, R. (2010). Supporting the reflective practice of tutors: What do tutors reflect on? Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., & Barp, D. (2008). Peer observation–a case for doing it online. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), 559–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., & Santy, J. (2009). A window on our teaching practice: Enhancing individual online teaching quality though online peer observation and support. A UK case study. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(6), 403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Prosser, M. (2002). Appraising new technologies for learning: A framework for development. Educational Media International, 39(3), 237–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton: Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching. https://depts.washington.edu/gs630/Spring/Boyer.pdf. Accessed: 24 Jan 2012.

  • Crisp, G., Sadler, R., Krause, K. -L., Buckridge, M. M., Wills, S., Brown, C., McLean, J., Dalton, H., Lievre, K. L., & Brougham, B. (2009), Peer review of teaching for promotion purposes: A project to develop and implement a pilot program of external peer review of teaching at four Australian universities, Report, Australian Learning and Teaching Council; Centre for Learning and Professional Development, The University of Adelaide; Griffith Institute for Higher Education, Griffith University; Centre for Educational Development and Interactive Resources, University of Wollongong; Learning and Teaching @ UNSW, The University of New South Wales, Adelaide, Australia. http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/peerreview/.

  • Ellis, R.A., & Goodyear, P. (2010). Students’ experiences of e-learning in higher education: The ecology of sustainable innovation. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R., & Conboy, H. (2009). Scoping the connections between emergent technologies and pedagogies for learner empowerment. In T. Mayes, D. Morrison, H. Mellar, P. Bullen, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Transforming higher education through technology-enhanced learning, Chapter 16, December (S. 220–234). York: The Higher Education Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. -L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (Eds.). (2008a). Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: A handbook to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne & Centre for Educational Development and Interactive Resources, University of Wollongong, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K. -L., Farrell, K., Bell, M., Devlin, M., & James, R. (2008b). Peer review of teaching in Australian higher education: Resources to support institutions in developing and embedding effective policies and practices (Final Project Report). Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne, Centre for Educational Development and Interactive Resources, University of Wollongong, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry, G. D., & Oliver, G. R. (2012) Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 9(1). http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol9/iss1/7.

  • Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and practice of distance education. Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., & Parker, N. (2011). Peer review in online and blended learning environments—final report. http://www.iml.uts.edu.au/peer-review. Accessed 3 Sept 2013.

  • McKenzie, J., Pelliccione, L., & Parker, N. (2008). Developing peer review of teaching in blended learning environments: Frameworks and challenges, In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings Ascilite Melbourne, 2008. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/mckenzie-j.pdf.

  • Mansvelt, J., Suddaby, G., O’Hara, D., & Gilbert, A. (2009). Professional development: assuring quality in e-Learning policy and practice. E-Learning Quality and Practice, 17(3), 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Protocols for Higher Education Approval Processes. (2007). http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Programs/StudentSupport/NationalProtocolsforHEApprovalProcesses. Accessed: 14 Dec 2011.

  • Office of Learning and Teaching. (2012). Fellowship announcement. http://www.olt.gov.au/olt-national-teaching-fellow-mitch-parsell. Accessed 13 Aug 2013.

  • Redmond, P. (2011). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: Pedagogical transitions. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011 (pp. 1050–1060). http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs/Redmond-full.pdf.

  • Ruiz, J. G., Candler, C., & Teasdale, T. A. (2007). Peer reviewing e-learning: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions. Academic Medicine, 82(5), 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observation: Continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinglehurst, D., Russell, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2006). Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach: End of project Report, December 2006. Centre for Distance Education, Teaching and Research Awards, University College London, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. G., & Richardson, A. S. (2001). Validating scholarship in university teaching: Constructing a national scheme for external peer review of ICT- based teaching and learning resources. Department of Education Training and Youth Affairs, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & Friedel, M. (2009). Peer review of online learning and teaching: Harnessing collective intelligence to address emerging challenges. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 60–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., & George, R. (2003). Quality standards in online teaching and learning: A tool for authors and developers. Interact, Integrate, Impact, Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Conference, In G. Crisp, D. Thiele, I. Scholten, S. Barker, & J. Baron (Eds.), Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Adelaide, Australia, 552–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Scutter, S., & Wache, D. (2009). Peer review of online learning and teaching, Final report. Australian Learning and Teaching Council Project. http://www.unisanet.unisa.edu.au/peerreview/default.asp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrelyn C. Applebee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Applebee, A. (2014). Peer Review for Distance Educators: Two Case Studies. In: Sachs, J., Parsell, M. (eds) Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics