Skip to main content

What Significance Does Christianity Have for Science Education?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching

Abstract

In a number of countries, issues to do with religion seem increasingly to be of importance in school science lessons and some other science educational settings, such as museums. This chapter begins by discussing the nature of religion and the nature of science and then looks at understandings of possible relationships between science and Christianity with particular reference to such issues as determinism, evolution and the uses to which advances in scientific knowledge may be put. It then goes on to examine whether the notion of worldviews is helpful to science educators working in this area. Finally, ways of teaching science so as to take account of Christian beliefs are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 749.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts, D., Apostel L., De Moor B., Hellemans S., Maex E., Van Belle H. & Van Der Veken J. (1994). World Views: From fragmentation to integration. Brussels: VUB Press. Available at http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/pub/books/worldviews.pdf. Accessed 19 September 2012.

  • Al-Hayani, F. A. (2005). Islam and science: contradiction or concordance, Zygon, 40, 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P. (2011). On being: A scientist’s exploration of the great questions of existence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science: The Gifford Lectures 1989–1991, volume 1. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, I. G. (1997). Religion and science: Historical and contemporary issues. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, T. (2004). Pasts beyond memory: Evolution, museums, colonialism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. J. (1988). God and evolution. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., Poole, M. & Grace, G. (2007). Science education and the Christian teacher. London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Boulay, J. (2009). Cosmos, life, and liturgy in a Greek Orthodox village. Limni, Evia: Denise Harvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer-Giorgio, G. (1988). Is Elvis alive? New York: Tudor Communications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. & Letts IV, W. J. (1998). The problem of dogmatism in science education. In: Curriculum, religion, and public education: Conversations for an enlarging public square, Sears, J. T. & Carper, J. C. (Eds). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley, J., Linthicum J. & Petros, A. (in press). Should religious beliefs be allowed to stonewall a secular approach to withdrawing and withholding treatment in children? Journal of Medical Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, J. H. (1991). Science and religion: Some historical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2003). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating, revised edn. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, S. A. (2005). Abducted: How people come to believe they were kidnapped by aliens. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, P. & Simpson, Z. (2006). The Oxford handbook of religion and science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, A. & Henriques, L. (2006). Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science, and religion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 419–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L. & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCSF (2007). Guidance on creationism and intelligent design. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20071204131026/http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890. Accessed 5 March 2012.

  • Dennett, D. C. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, T. (2008). Science and religion: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elvis is Alive (2012). Proof. Retrieved from www.elvis-is-alive.com/. Accessed 15 September 2012.

  • (The) Episcopal Church (1979). Book of Common Prayer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, J. (2005). The day without yesterday: Lemaître, Einstein, and the birth of modern cosmology. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H. G. Jr. (2009). Science, worldviews, and education. Science & Education, 18, 667–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford Lectures (2006). Overview: history of the Gifford Lectures, http://www.giffordlectures.org/overview.asp. Accessed 5 March 2012.

  • Glennan, S. (2009). Whose science and whose religion? Reflections on the relations between scientific and religious worldviews. Science & Education, 18, 797–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, P. (2001). The Bible, Protestantism and the rise of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haught, J. F. (1995). Science and religion: From conflict to conversation. Mahwah NJ: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. (1976/1985). Death and eternal life. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1999). Why gods persist: A scientific approach to religion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnells, J. R. (1991). A handbook of living religions. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooykaas, R. (1972). Religion and the rise of modern science. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. (2009). Boyle: Between God and science. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ipsos MORI (2011). Religion and globalisation. http://www.fgi-tbff.org/randp/casestudies/religion-globalisation. Accessed 15 September 2012.

  • Jones, A., McKim, A. & Reiss, M. (Eds) (2010). Ethics in the science and technology classroom: A new approach to teaching and learning. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. (1992). What is faith? Essays in the philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, C. (1859). Letter to Charles Darwin, 18 November. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2534. Accessed 5 March 2012.

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, 2 nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langford, M. (1981). Providence. London: SCM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawes, C. (2009). Faith and Darwin: Harmony, conflict, or confusion? London: Theos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. Y. & Newberg, A. B. (2005). Religion and health: a review and critical analysis, Zygon, 40, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, A. (2005). Has science eliminated God? Richard Dawkins and the meaning of life. Science & Christian Belief, 17, 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntosh, J. J. (2006). Boyle on atheism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mepham, B. (2008). Bioethics: An introduction for the biosciences, 2 nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. C. (2009). Signature in the cell: DNA and the evidence for Intelligent Design. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C. & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (2007). The history of the creationism/evolution controversy and likely future developments. In: Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism, Jones, L. & Reiss, M. J. (Eds). New York: Peter Lang, pp. 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, L. (2005). Theology and the new physics. In: God, humanity and the cosmos, 2 nd edn revised and expanded as A companion to the science-religion debate, Southgate, C. (Ed.). London: T & T Clark, pp. 119–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pannenberg, W. (2006). Problems between science and theology in the course of their modern history, Zygon, 41, 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (2011). On what matters: Volume 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, A. (2001). Paths from science towards God: The end of all our exploring. Oxford: Oneworld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (2010). Religion and science. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2010/entries/religion-science/. Accessed 9 September 2012.

  • Polkinghorne, J. (1994). Science and Christian belief: Theological reflections of a bottom-up thinker. The Gifford Lectures for 1993–4. London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, J. (2004). Science and the Trinity: The Christian encounter with reality. London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, J. (2005). The continuing interaction of science and religion, Zygon, 40, 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, J. (2006). Where is natural theology today? Science & Christian Belief, 18, 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. (1998). Teaching about science and religion: Opportunities within Science in the National Curriculum. Abingdon: Culham College Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1934/1972). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, J. (1691/2005). The wisdom of God manifested in the works of the creation. London: Ray Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (1999). Teaching ethics in science. Studies in Science Education, 34, 115–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2000). On suffering and meaning: an evolutionary perspective. Modern Believing, 41(2), 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2008a). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44, 157–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M.J. (2008b). Teaching evolution in a creationist environment: an approach based on worldviews, not misconceptions. School Science Review, 90(331), 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2008c). The use of ethical frameworks by students following a new science course for 16–18 year-olds. Science & Education, 17, 889–902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J. (2012). What should be the role of religion in science education and bioethics? In: Sacred Science? On science and its interrelations with religious worldviews, Øyen, S. A., Lund-Olsen, T. & Vaage, N. S. (Eds). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp. 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M.J. (2013a) Religion in science education. In: Science Education for Diversity: Theory and Practice, Mansour, N. & Wegerif, R. (Eds), Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 317–328.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M.J. (2013b) Beliefs and the value of evidence. In: Communication and Engagement with Science and Technology: Issues and Dilemmas, Gilbert, J.K. & Stocklmayer, S.M. (Eds), Routledge, New York, pp. 148–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, V. & Tanner, R. E. S. (1983). The Biology of Religion. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robitaille, D. & Dirks, M. (1982). Models for mathematics curriculum. For the Learning of Mathematics, 2, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak, T. (1994). God and the final frontier. New Scientist, 28 March, 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. A. (2000). Michael Faraday: Physics and faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M. (2002). Empirically grounded clinical interventions: cognitive-behavioural therapy progresses through a multi-dimensional approach to clinical science. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, N. (2002). Divine action and modern science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, E. (1999). The creation/evolution continuum. Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 19, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (2007). Rethinking evolution in the museum: Envisioning African origins. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skehan, J. W. & Nelson, C. E. (2000). The creation controversy & the science classroom. Arlington VA: NSTA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, N. (1989). The world’s religions: Old traditions and modern transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, M. (2004). How to relate science and religion: A multidimensional model. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm B Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg, T. & Teece, G. (2011). Teaching religion and science: Effective pedagogy and practical approaches for RE teachers. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szerszynski, B. (2005). Rethinking the secular: science, technology, and religion today. Zygon, 40, 813–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, M. (2008). After Atheism: Science, religion and the meaning of life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, M. (2010). Dishonest to God. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, F. (Ed.) (1998). Science meets faith. London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. A. (2001). Doing without Adam and Eve: Sociobiology and original sin. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, M. W., Staver, J. R. & Scharmann, L. C. (2011). Evolution and personal religious belief: Christian university biology-related majors’ search for reconciliation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1026–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, S. (2005). Making sense of science: Understanding the social study of science. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael J. Reiss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reiss, M.J. (2014). What Significance Does Christianity Have for Science Education?. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics