Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 183))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The evaluation of antiarrhythmic drugs has been for a long time based on the quantification of premature beats at Holter and the inducibility of tachyarrhythmias at electrophysiological study. These approaches are convenient to provide short-term and reliable but limited evaluations on the effects of type I agents in relatively benign arrhythmias occurring in patients with a good cardiac function. The situation is much more uncertain for the long-term outcome in serious tachyarrhythmias occurring in severely diseased patients. In addition, the rules that have been erected for type I agents are not really adapted to beta-blockers and type III drugs, the effects of which are much more difficult to assess and depend at least in part on the target arrhythmia. There is an interest to evaluate the drug efficacy in terms of responders and nonre-sponders, and to try to understand the reasons for such a response. Rules for the evaluation of antiarrhythmic efficacy certainly have to be revisited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coumel P. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and the management of arrhythmias. Precision versus inflexibility. Br Heart J 1983; 49: 201–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. IMPACT Research group. International mexiletine and placebo antiarrhythmic coronary trial.I. Report on arrhythmia and other findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 1148–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. Cast and beyond. Implications of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. Eur Heart J 1990; 11: 194–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson KP, DeCamilla J, Moss AJ. Clinical significance of ventricular tachycardia (3 beats or longer) detected during ambulatory monitoring after myocardial infarction. Circulation 1978; 57: 890–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitra RL, Buxton AE. The clinical significance of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1993; 4: 490–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Leclercq JF, Leenhardt A, Le Marec H, Clémenty J, Hermida JS, Sebag C, Aliot E and the Working Group of the French Society of Cardiology. Predictive value of electrophysiologic studies during treatment of ventricular tachycardia with the beta-blocking agent nadolol. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 413–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt G, Ulm K, Barthel P, Goedel-Meinen L, Jahns G, Baedeker W. Spontaneous variability of simple and complex ventricular premature contractions during long-term intervals in patients with severe organic heart disease. Circulation 1988; 78: 296–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anastasiou-Nana MI, Menlove RL, Nanas JN, Anderson JL. Changes in spontaneous variability of ventricular ectopic activity as a function of time in patients with chronic arrhythmias. Circulation 1988; 78: 286–95.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen MR. The links between basic and clinical cardiac electro-physiology. Circulation 1988; 77: 251–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Task Force of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. The “Sicilian Gambit”. A new approach to the classification of the antiarrhythmic drugs based on their actions on arrhythmogenic mechanisms. Eur Heart J 1991; 12: 1112–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coumel P, Rosengarten MD, Leclercq, JF, Attuel P. Role of sympathetic nervous system in non-ischaemic ventricular arrhythmias. Br Heart J 1982; 47: 137–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Coumel P, Leclercq JF, Assayag P. European experience with the antiarrhythmic efficacy of propafenone for supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54D: 60–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Task Force of the Working Group on Cardiac Arrhythmias and Cardiac Pacing of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines for the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 1304–10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coumel, P. (1996). The evaluation of antiarrhythmics. In: Oto, M.A. (eds) Practice and Progress in Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 183. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0219-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6582-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-0219-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics