Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 167))

Abstract

The central examples of indexical expressions are the English pronouns I, ‘you’, ‘it’, and temporal and spatial expressions like ‘now’, ‘tomorrow’, ‘here’ and ‘there’; these indexicals are syntactically simple, and can be used to form complex indexical expressions such as ‘my father’, ‘over there’, and ‘the day after tomorrow’. An indexical expression is, roughly, one whose associated object is not given once for all, as it is for a proper name. Rather, the associated object changes in some systematic way from context of use to context of use, and one task of any semantics of indexicals is to explain or articulate the system which is actually at work here. In the literature, it is also usual to include with indexicals other kinds of expression which have a salient semantic feature that changes as the context of use changes; for instance, demonstratives, such as ‘that man’, and tense operators, such as ‘it will be the case that’; so we will count these as indexicals too.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selective Bibliography

  • Barwise, J. and Cooper, R.: 1982, ‘Generalized quantifiers and natural language’. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Sinning against Frege’, The Philosophical Review 88, 318–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks, A. W.: 1948, ‘Icon, index and symbol’, Philosophy and Phenomenical Research 9. 673–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1947, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H.-N.: 1968, ‘On the logic of attributions of self-knowledge to others’, Journal of Philosophy 65, 439–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, R.: 1970, Person and Object, Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1973, 1974. ‘Outline of a revised formulation of the logic of sense and denotation’, Noûs 7, 24–33, 8, 135—56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M.: 1982. ‘Individuation and the semantics of demonstratives’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 11, 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D.: 1978, Brainstorms, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K.: 1979, ‘The contingent a priori and rigid designators’. in P. French et al. (eds.), Contempurary Perspective in the Philosophy of Languange. Minnesota University Press, pp. 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1982, The Varieties of Reference, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1977, Logical Investigations, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1977, The Structure of Appearance, 3rd. edition. D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E.: 1970, Logical Investigations Volume One, Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1977, Demonstratives, Draft #2, mimeo, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, D.: 1979, ‘The logic of demonstratives’, in P. French et al. (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minnesota University Press, pp. 401–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H.: 1971, ‘Formal properties of “now”’, Theoria 37,227–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1972, ‘Naming and necessity’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, pp. 253–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1980, ‘Index, context and content’, in S. Kanger and S. Ohman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, D. Reidel, pp. 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loar, G.: 1972, ‘Reference and propositional attitudes’, The Philosophical Review 81, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1981, ‘The mechanism of reference’, Synthese 49, 157–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1983, The Subjective View, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montague, R.: 1974, Formal Philosophy, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, C.: 1982, ‘Intensional logic in extensional language’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 47, 289–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T.: 1981, ‘Frege’s hierarchies of indirect senses and the paradox of analysis’, in P. French, et al. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. VI: The Foundations of Analytic Philosophy, Minnesota University Press, pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C.: 1976 ‘What is a logical constant?’, Journal of Philosophy 73,221–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C.: 1983, Sense and Content, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S.: 1932, Collected Papers Volume II: Elements of Logic, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on demonstratives’, The Philosophical Review 86, 474–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1979, ‘The problem of the essential indexical’, Noûs 13, 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H.: 1948, Elements of Symbolic Logic, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1940, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1983, Intentionality, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1978, ‘Assertion’, in P. Cole, (ed.), Syntax and Semantics Vol. 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press, pp. 315–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B.: 1977, ‘The only necessity is verbal necessity’, Journal of Philosophy 74, 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forbes, G. (1989). Indexicals. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Synthese Library, vol 167. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1171-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1171-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7021-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1171-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics