Skip to main content

Sustainable use of whales: whaling or whale watching?

  • Chapter
The Exploitation of Mammal Populations

Synopsis

An examination of the history of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) can offer valuable insights to those managing the exploitation of other wild mammals. To understand the many issues one must look further than the IWC’s past inability to manage whaling which resulted in the declaration of an indefinite moratorium on commercial whaling.

More international effort has been put into determining procedures for the sustainable exploitation of whales than for any other group of wild mammals, yet the history of whaling shows that these substantial efforts have largely failed. Previous attempts to set catch quotas have relied on approaches that were later discovered to be flawed. In addition, science apart, it has never been possible to effectively control whaling. Even when the IWC was setting catch limits that were far too high, those rules were being systematically broken. One example, revealed in 1994 by the Russian Federation, concerns thousands of blue, right and humpback whales that were caught (but not reported to the IWC at the time) by the whaling expeditions of the former Soviet Union years after these species had supposedly received IWC protection.

The various policy options before the IWC include the continuation of the moratorium, a resumption of whaling, the declaration of sanctuaries and the management of whale watching. In recognition of previous inadequacies in attempts to exploit whales in a sustainable fashion, the Scientific Committee of the IWC has spent several years putting together a sophisticated and precautionary procedure (known as the Revised Management Procedure, or RMP) for calculating catch quotas. The RMP is a component of the Revised Management Scheme (RMS) which will encompass other matters to ensure that any whaling is effectively regulated and that catch limits are enforced. In contrast to the effort expended on the development of the RMP, little time has been spent on discussion of regulatory matters. The remote Southern Ocean (the feeding grounds for about 80% of the world’s remaining whales) is one area where regulation of whaling operations remains an insuperable problem and in May 1994 the IWC declared this area a sanctuary for an indefinite period. Finally, utilization should not imply that the use must be lethal. Whale watching is a rapidly growing form of non-lethal sustainable utilization which occurs in around 40 countries; it generates substantial tourist revenue and requires regulation to limit disturbance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anon (1992) Agenda 21: The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development: Rio Declaration, Rio de Janeiro. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1994) Article in Dagbladet, 1 September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C.S. and Palumbi, S.R. (1994) Which whales are hunted? A molecular genetic approach to monitoring whaling. Science, 265, 1538–1539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birnie, P. (1993) UNCED and marine mammals. Marine Policy, 17, 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, D. (1992) Science and sentimentality. Nature, 357, 532–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin, D.E. (1982) The Ecology of Whales and Dolphins, Heinemann Educational Books Ltd, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, E. (1992) Whale watching around the world: a report on the value, extent and prospects. International Whale Bulletin No. 7, Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society, Bath, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, E. (1994) Whale watching worldwide: an overview of the industry and the implications for science and conservation. Proceedings of the European Cetacean Society, 8, 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAW, Tethys Research Institute and Europe Conservation (1995) Report of the Workshop on the Scientific Aspects of Managing Whale Watching, Montecastello di Vibio, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991) Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (International Whaling Commission) (1980) Report of the Scientific Committee. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 30, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1981a) Report of the Scientific Committee. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 31, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1981b) Report of the Workshop on Humane Killing Techniques for Whales. Cambridge 10–14 November 1980. Paper IWC/33/15 presented to the Thirty-third Meeting of the Commission (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1990) Chairman’s Report of the Forty-first Annual Meeting. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 40, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1993) Report of the Scientific Committee. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 43, 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1995a) Chairman’s Report of the Forty-sixth Annual Meeting. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 45, 64.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1995b) Chairman’s Report of the Forty-sixth Annual Meeting, Appendix 5. IWC Resolution 1994–5. Resolution on the Revised Management Scheme. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 45, 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1995c) Report of the Scientific Committee. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 45, 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • IWC (1995d) Report of the Scientific Committee. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 47(4), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kestin, S.C. (1995) Welfare aspects of the commercial slaughter of whales. Animal Welfare, 4(1), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R. and Walters, C. (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: lessons from history. Science, 260, 17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D., Hilborn, R. and Walters, C. (1993) Uncertainty, resource exploitation and conservation: lessons from history. Science, 260, 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyster, S. (1985) International Wildlife Law, Grotius Publications, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, H. (1995) The use of electricity to kill minke whales: humane considerations. Animal Welfare, 4(2), 125–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvaney, K. (1993) Norway caught flogging minke — baggage man finds world’s largest shrimp. BBC Wildlife, 11(12), 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papastavrou, V. (1993) Harvesting of whales. Nature, 361, 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonnessen, J.N. and Johnsen, A.O. (1982) The History of Modern Whaling, Hurst and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yablokov, A. (1994) Validity of whaling data. Nature, 367, 108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemsky, V.A., Berzin, A.A., Mikhaliev, Y.A. and Tormosov, D.D. (1995) Report of the Scientific Committee, Annex E. Report of the Sub-Committee on Southern Hemisphere Baleen Whale. Appendix 3. Soviet Antarctic pelagic whaling after WWII: Review of actual catch data. Rep. int. Whal. Commn, 45, 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Chapman & Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papastavrou, V. (1996). Sustainable use of whales: whaling or whale watching?. In: Taylor, V.J., Dunstone, N. (eds) The Exploitation of Mammal Populations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1525-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1525-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-7182-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-1525-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics