Skip to main content

Two Questions about Pleasure

  • Chapter
Philosophical Analysis

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 39))

Abstract

In this paper, I present my solutions to two closely related questions about pleasure. One of these questions is fairly well known. Quite a few philosophers have discussed it, and the literature contains many proposed answers. The second question seems to me to be at least as interesting as the first, but it apparently hasn’t interested quite so many philosophers. I know of only a few proposed answers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Alston, William [1967], ‘Pleasure’, in Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (New York: Macmillan and Company), 6 341–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Richard [1959], Ethical Theory (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, Richard [1979], A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford: The Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, Franz [1969], ‘Loving and Hating’, appendix to The Origin of our Knowledge of Right and Wrong, translated by Roderick M. Chisholm and Elizabeth H. Schneewind (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul) 137–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. [1981], The First Person (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. (forthcoming a), Brentano and Intrinsic Value (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisholm, Roderick M. (forthcoming b), ‘Brentano’s Theory of Pleasure and Pain,’ Topoi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Wayne [1981a], ‘A Theory of Happiness’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18 Number 2 (April) 111–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Wayne [1981b], ‘Pleasure and Happiness,’ Philosophical Studies 39 305–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Wayne [1982], ‘A Causal Theory of Enjoyment,’ Mind XCI 240–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, Karl [1940], ‘On Pleasure, Emotion, and Striving’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, I 391–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Rem B. [1979], Pleasures and Pains: A Theory of Qualitative Hedonism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, Sigmund, Beyond the Pleasure Principle

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Irwin [1985], ‘Hedonic Pluralism’, Philosophical Studies 48 49–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Robert M. [1974], ‘The Aboutness of Emotions’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 11, Number 1 (January) 27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, J. C. B. [1969], Pleasure and Desire (Oxford: The Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Anthony [1963], Action, Emotion and Will (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David [1979], ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review, 88 (October) 513–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markie, Peter [1984], ‘De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Studies, 45 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. [1962], Principia Ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek [1984], Reasons and Persons (Oxford: The Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Penelhum, Terence [1964], Pleasure and Falsity’, American Philosophical Quarterly, I, 2 (April) 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penelhum, Terence [1957], ‘The Logic of Pleasure’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17 488–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, David [1967], The Concept of Pleasure (The Hague: Mouton). Plato, Philebus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert [1949], The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert [1956], Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert [1954], ‘Pleasure’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supplementary volume 28 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, Henry [1962], The Methods of Ethics (London: Macmillan & Co, Ltd.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thalberg, Irving [1962], ‘False Pleasures’, The Journal of Philosophy 59 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Wright, G. H. [1963], The Varieties of Goodness (London: Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. A. O. [1959], ‘Pleasure and Belief’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 33 57 – 72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feldman, F. (1988). Two Questions about Pleasure. In: Austin, D.F. (eds) Philosophical Analysis. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2909-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2909-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3150-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-2909-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics