Comments on Wexler and Manzini

Abstract

The development of a parameterized theory of Universal Grammar is still a very young idea, and so some fundamental questions are still very close to the surface: What counts as a parametric theory? What should such a theory explain? Wexler and Manzini (henceforth, W&M) provide us with a new approach to these issues, one which is sure to engender much worthwhile research and discussion. In the commentary that follows, I limit my discussion to some of the contrasts and consequences that emerge when the W&M approach is compared to what has come to be the standard account of parameters.¹

I would like to thank Robert Matthews for useful discussion of some of the issues involved. He does not necessarily share my views. I would also like ti thank Tom Roeper and Edwin Williams for their patience and editorial help.