Abstract
The purpose of this article is to discuss the practical experience of using ‘Special Care Questioning’ techniques, developed at the Psychology Unit of the Royal Hong Kong Police Force. Special Care Questioning refers to techniques, and the avoidance of identifiable hazards, in obtaining accurate testimony from mentally vulnerable witnesses. In this context, ‘mentally vulnerable’ witnesses may include children, the mentally impaired, emotionally traumatized victims, and normal adults, in circumstances where memories of vital information are poor. This latter group has sometimes been selected to undergo ‘forensic hypnosis’ procedures to recover these memories (Ault, 1980). Occasionally, our category of ‘mentally vulnerable’ witnesses might include a cooperative suspect who cannot remember well whether he carried out a certain act in such a way that it qualifies as a serious crime. If he considers he might have done, and is questioned in a way to improperly prompt him to make a false confession to police, he can be considered to be vulnerable in our sense of the word. This last type of phenomenon has been identified as a ‘memory distrust syndrome’ (Gudjonsson & MacKeith, 1982). There have been a number of major unfortunate cases of miscarriage of justice in the United Kingdom concerning such accused persons. They are usually of below average intelligence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ault, R. (1980, January). Hypnosis, the FBI’s team approach. F.B.I. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 5–8.
Bowers, J., & Bekerian, D. (1983). When will post-event information distort eyewitness testimony? Journal of Applied Psychology.
Dent, H., & Stevenson, G. (1979). An experimental study of the effectiveness and different techniques of questioning child witnesses. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 41–51.
Evans, F. (1967). Suggestibility in the normal waking state. Psychological Review, 67(2), 114–129.
Gieselman, R., Fisher, R., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L., Sullivan, S., Avetissian, I., & Prosk, A. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12, 74–80.
Goodman, G., & Michelli, J. ( 1981, November). Would you believe a child witness ? Psychology Today, 82–95.
Gudjonsson, G. (1983). Suggestibility, intelligence, memory recall, and personality: An experimental study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 35–37.
Gudjonsson, G. (1984a). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5., 303–314.
Gudjonsson, G. (1984b). Interrogative suggestibility and its relationship with self-esteem and control. Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 24, 99–10.
Gudjonsson, G., & MacKeith, J. A. (1982). False confessions. Psychological effects of interrogation. A discussion paper. In A. Trankell (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials. Stockholm, Sweden: P.A. Norstedt & Söners Forlag.
Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E., & Davies, G. (1984). Distortions in children’s memory. Unpublished manuscript.
Malpass, R., & Devine, P. (1981). Guided memory in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 343–350.
Marin, B., Holmes, D., Guth, M., & Kovack, P. (1979). The potential of children as eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 295–305.
Reiser, M. (1980). Handbook of investigative hypnosis. Los Angeles, CA: LEHI Publishing Co.
Sheehy, N. (1983). The child as witness. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wales Institute of Science and Technology.
Shepherd, J., Ellis, H., & Davies, G. (1982). Identification evidence.
Svartvik, J. (1968). The Evans statements, a case for forensic linguistics. Sweden: Gothenberg University Press.
Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm, Sweden: Rotobeckman.
Tully, B. (1985). ‘Special care questioning’. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin.
Tully, B., & Cahill, D. (1984). Police interviewing of the mentally handicapped: An experimental study. London, UK: The Police Foundation.
Undeutsch, U. (1982). Statement reality analysis. In A. Trankell, (Ed.), Reconstructing the past: The role of psychologists in criminal trials. Stockholm, Sweden: P.A. Norstedt & Söners Forlag.
Yarmey, A. P. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York: The Free Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1986 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tully, B. (1986). "Special Care Questioning" of Mentally Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses of Crime. In: Yuille, J.C. (eds) Police Selection and Training. NATO ASI Series, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4434-3_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4434-3_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-8474-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-4434-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive