Skip to main content

An Assessment of the Factors Affecting Hydraulic Fracture Containment in Layered Rock: Observations from a Mineback Experiment

  • Conference paper
Hydraulic fracturing and geothermal energy

Part of the book series: Mechanics of elastic and inelastic solids ((MEIS,volume 5))

Abstract

In situ experiments, which were accessible for direct observation by mine-back, have been conducted to determine the effect that geologic discontinuities, elastic properties, and in situ stress differences have on hydraulic fracture propagation and the resultant overall fracture geometry. Vertical fractures were observed to terminate only in regions of high minimum horizontal in situ stress. Fracture growth into a higher (by a factor of 5 to 15) elastic modulus region was preferred to propagation into a region of higher (by a factor of 2) stress. Geologic discontinuities did not arrest the lateral or vertical propagation of hydraulic fractures. However, hydraulic fracture growth was affected by discontinuities, because fracture-fluid leakoff occurred along intersecting discontinuitiDS which the hydraulic fractures crossed, and thereby reduced the total extent of the hydraulic fractures. The results of the mineback experiment clearly indicate that differences in the minimum horizontal in situ stress between the reservoir rock and adjacent layers is the most critical factor affecting hydraulic fracture containment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Perkins, T. K. and Kern, L. R. (1961). Widths of hydraulic fractures: Jour. Pet. Tech. (13), 937–949.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, T. S. and Erdogan, F. (1972). Streuten in bonded materials with a crack perpendicular to the interface: Int’l. Jour. Eng. Sci. (10), 677–697.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Simonson, E. R., Abou-Sayed, A. S., and Clifton, R. J. (1978). Containment of massive hydraulic fractures: Soc. Pet. Eng. Jour. (18), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daneshy, A. A. (1978). Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered formations: Soc. Pet. Eng. Jour. (18), 33–41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Teufel, L. W. (1979). An experimental study of hydraulic fracture propagation in layered rock: Ph.D. Dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, G. D. (1981). Effects of friction on hydraulic fracture growth near unbonded interfaces in rocks: Soc. Pet. Eng. Jour., 21, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Teufel, L. W. and Clark, J. A. (1982). Hydraulic fracture propagation in layered rock: experimental studies of fracture containment: Soc. Pet. Eng. Jour., Paper No. 9878, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hooker, V. E. and Bickel, D. L. (1974). Overcoring equipment and techniques used in rock stress determination: U.S. Bureau of Mines Inform. Circ. 8618, 32p.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzpatrick, J. (1962). Biaxial device for determining the elasticity of stress-relief cores: U.S. Bureau of Mines Report 6128, 13p.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warpinski, N. R., Northrop, D. A., and Schmidt, R. A. (1978). Direct observation of hydraulic fractures: behavior at a formation interface: Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND78–1935.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Warpinski, N. R., Schmidt, R. A., and Northrop, D. A. (1982). In situ stresses: the predominant influence on hydraulic fracture containment: Jour. Pet. Tech., (34), 653–664.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt, R. A. (1980). A mierocrack model and its significance to hydraulic fracturing and fracture toughness testing: in Proceedings of the 21stU.S. Symp. Rock Mech., Rolla, MO, 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Warpinski, N. R., Clark, J. A., Schmidt, R. A., and Huddle, C. W. (1982). Laboratory investigation on the effect of in situ stresses on hydraulic fracture containment: Soc. Pet. Eng. Jour., 22, 333–340.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague

About this paper

Cite this paper

Teufel, L.W., Warpinski, N.R. (1983). An Assessment of the Factors Affecting Hydraulic Fracture Containment in Layered Rock: Observations from a Mineback Experiment. In: Nemat-Nasser, S., Abé, H., Hirakawa, S. (eds) Hydraulic fracturing and geothermal energy. Mechanics of elastic and inelastic solids, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6884-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6884-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-6886-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-6884-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics