Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 38))

  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

The little word ‘and’ is one of the fascinating words of English, like ‘of’.1 But of the two ‘and’ is by far the more fundamental, being needed almost continually in the statement of logical forms or semantic structures, as already noted. ‘Of’, on the other hand, is always eliminable from such structures, and in fact is presumably eliminable altogether from the basic vocabulary of English, its various uses being definable in terms of other notions available. Uses of ‘and’, on the other hand, are definable using the truth-functional ‘·’, together of course with other notions. The fundamentally of the truth-functions, along with the quantifiers and identity, surely needs no gainsaying at the present stage of linguistic research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Recall Chapter X.

    Google Scholar 

  2. It would be interesting to determine the historically first suggestions for the need of this kind of a treatment.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. ‘Of Servants, Lovers, and Benefactors,’ in Peirce’s Logic of Relations and Other Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Recall his ‘The Two Systems of Grammar: Report and Paraphrase.’

    Google Scholar 

  5. In his Introduction to Logical Theory (Methuen, London: 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  6. As in Chapters VIII, IX and X above.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Many of the examples here are taken from the Oxford English Dictionary.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. ‘On Harris’s Systems of Report and Paraphrase.’

    Google Scholar 

  9. From her ‘If’s, And’s, and But’s about Conjunction,’ University of Michigan mimeo, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cf. the discussion in ‘On the Very Idea of a Logical Form.’

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted from the restaurateur Louis Szathmary, The New York Times, May 24, 1975, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, R.M. (1979). ‘And’. In: Pragmatics, Truth, and Language. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9457-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9457-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0993-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9457-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics