Abstract
Organizations are moving towards a new type of work: group-to-group collaboration across distance, supported by technologies that connect rooms across distance into large collaboration spaces. In this study we report on distributed group-to-group collaboration in the domain of space mission design. We use the metaphor of the “space between” distant groups to describe the connections, interdependencies, and gaps that exist. To the extent that the “space between” remains wide, the risk for design errors increases. We found that different teams, who had different processes and methodologies, were able to form hybrid solutions. However, their hybrid solutions addressed mostly terms and results, and did not address the deeper methodologies that created the results. We also found that some individuals acted as information bridges across sites, representing the teams in articulation. To a large extent small groups were used for reconciling perspectives, but the majority of results were not communicated and integrated back into the larger team. We discuss the challenges that group-to-group collaboration designers face in meeting requirements for supporting these new technologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Access Grid (2002): http://www-fp.mcs.anl.gov/fl/accessgrid/default.htm
Ackerman, M. S., Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S. D., and Starr, B. (1997): ‘Hanging on the wire: A field study of an audio-only media space’, ACM Trans, on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 39–66.
Ancona, D. G. and Caldwell, D. F. (1992): ‘Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams’, Admin. Science Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 634–665.
Bavelas, A. (1950): ‘Communication patterns in task-oriented groups’, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 22, pp. 271–282.
Bechky, B. (forthcoming): ‘Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor’, Organization Science.
Bradbury, H. and Lichtenstein, B. (2000): ‘Relationality in organizational research: Exploring the space between’, Organization Science, vol. 11, pp. 551–564.
Bradner, E., Kellogg, W., and Erickson, T. (1999): ‘The adoption and use of ‘Babble’: A field study of chat in the workplace’, Proceedings of the ECSCW99, Copenhagen, pp. 139–158.
Carroll, J. M. (2000): Making Use: Scenario-based Design of Human-Computer Interactions, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dovidio, J. F. and Ellyson, S. L. (1982): ‘Decoding Visual Dominance: Attributions of Power based on Relative Percentages of Looking-while-Speaking and Looking-while-Listening’, Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 106–113.
Finholt, T.A. (2003): ‘Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization’, Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, vol. 12, pp. 5–25.
Fitzpatrick, G., Kaplan, S., and Mansfield, T. (1996): ‘Physical spaces, virtual places and social worlds: A study of work in the virtual’, Proceedings of CSCW’96, pp. 334–343.
Freeman, Linton C. (1991): ‘Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow’, Social Networks, vol. 13, pp. 141–154.
Gerson, E. M. and Star, S. L. (1986): ‘Analyzing due process in the workplace’, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 257–270.
Heath, C. and Staudenmayer, N. (2000): ‘Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complication coordination in organizations, in B. M. Stay and R. I. Sutton (eds.): Research in Organizational Behavior, Elsevier, Oxford: pp. 153–191.
Hutchins, E. (2000): Cognition in the Wild, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
LSMD (Laboratory for Spacecraft and Mission Design): ICEMaker, http://www.lsmd.caltech.edu/tools/icemaker/icemaker.php
Mark, G. and DeFlorio, P. (2001): ‘An experiment using life-size HDTV’, Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Advanced Collaborative Environments, San Francisco, CA.
Mark, G., Grudin, J. and Poltrock, S. (1999): ‘Meeting at the desktop: An empirical study of virtually collocated teams’, Proceedings of ECSCW’99, Copenhagen, pp. 159–178.
Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., and Bradner, E. (2000): ‘Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action’, Proceedings of CSCW2000, pp. 79–88.
Nardi, B., (ed.) (1996): Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000): ‘Distance Matters’, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 15, no. 2/3, pp. 139–178.
Roberts, K. and Yu, K. (2003). ‘The space between: Partitioning and component focus as sources of error in healthcare.’ Unpublished manuscript.
Robertson, T. (1997): ‘Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied actions’, Proceedings of ECSCW’97, Lancaster, UK, pp. 205–220.
Ruhleder, K. and Jordan, B. (1999): ‘Meaning-making across remote sites: How delays in transmission affect interaction’, Proceedings ECSCW’99, Copenhagen, pp. 411–429.
Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. (1992): ‘Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 7–40.
Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998): Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Vaughan, D. (1997): The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001): Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mark, G., Abrams, S., Nassif, N. (2003). Group-to-Group Distance Collaboration: Examining the “Space Between”. In: Kuutti, K., Karsten, E.H., Fitzpatrick, G., Dourish, P., Schmidt, K. (eds) ECSCW 2003. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3994-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0068-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive