Skip to main content

Are Performative Utterances Declarations?

  • Chapter
Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 79))

Abstract

Performatives are of particular interest to the philosophy of language and linguistics because of the special tension that they reveal between semantics and pragmatics: any theory of them must explain their ‘performative force’, the (often nonconstative2) force marked by the performative element of the sentence, within the framework of a compositional semantics. An account of performatives would be easy were we to give up one or the other. For instance, if performative utterances were always just constative in their force, then the grammatical form of performative sentences could be straightforwardly declarative (or truth-valuable). On the other hand, if we ignore compositionality, then their performative force could be given by special conventions of force that attach to the performative element in (just) the performative sentence. But neither option is very attractive. Sentences (1a – c) really do seem to be used nonconstatively (not truth-valuable) — in fact they seem to be used to perform the act named by the performative verb (or noun etc.) that they contain:3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akmajian, A., R. Doners, and R. Hamish. “Overcoming Inadequacies in the Message-Model of Linguistic Communication.” Communication and Cognition 13(4) (1980): 317–336. Reprinted in A. Kasher (ed.). Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. London: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, K. Linguistic Meaning, Vol. 2. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. “Performative Utterances.” In Philosophical Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. “Performative-Constative.” In: C. Caton (ed.). Philosophy and Ordinary Language. Urbana, IL: Illinois University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. “Performatives are Statements Too.” Philosophical Studies 28 (1975): 229–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. “Default Reasoning.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 65(1) (1984): 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. “Standardization and Conventionalization.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 677–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K., and R. Harnish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K., and R. Hamish. “How Performatives Really Work: A Reply to Searle.” Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (1992): 93–110. Reprinted in A. Kasher (ed.). Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. London: Routledge, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolet, R. “Are There Indirect Speech Acts?” In: S. Tsohatzidis (ed.). Foundations of Speech Act Theory. London: Routledge, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crimmins, M. Talk About Beliefs. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. “On Saying That.” Synthese 19 (1968): 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. “Moods and Performances.” In: A. Margalit (ed.). Meaning and Use. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J., and Z. Pylyshyn. “Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture.” In: S. Pinker, and J. Mehler (eds.). Connections and Symbols. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, R. “Do Performative Utterances have any Constative Function?” Journal of Philosophy 5 (1970): 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginet, C. “Performativity.” Linguistic and Philosophy 3 (1979): 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewendorf, G. “Explicit Performatives and Statements.” Journal of Pragmatics 3 (1979): 431–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. “Some Implications of Illocutions.” Lingua 62(1/2) (1984): 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. “Performatives are Default Reflexive Standardized Indirect Acts.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 38 (1-4) (1988): 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. “Meaning and Performatives.” In: M. Thelen et al (eds.). Meaning and Translation. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Rijkshogeschool, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. “Performatives and Standardization: A Progress Report.” Linguistische Berichte 8 (1997): 161–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J. “Explicit Performative Utterances and Statements.” Philosophical Quarterly 24(95) (1974): 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmon, E. J. “On Sentences Verifiable by their Use.” Analysis 22 (1962): 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimer, M. “Performative Utterances: A Reply to Bach and Harnish.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 655–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, J. “Pragmatic Self Verification and Performatives.” Foundations of Language 1 (1971): 300–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1975a), “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts”. Reprinted in Searle (1979) op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1975b), “Indirect Speech Acts”. Reprinted in Searle (1979) op cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. “How Performatives Work.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (1989): 535–538. Reprinted in R. Hamish (ed.). Basic Topics in the Philosophy of Language. Prentice-Hall (Wheatsheaf), 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. Mind, Language and Society. New York: Basic Books, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R., and D. Vanderveken. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, S. Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. Relevance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadock, J., and A. Zwicky. “Speech Act Distinctions in Syntax.” In: T. Shopen (ed.). Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. I. Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staugaard, A. Robotics and AI. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warnock, G. J. “Some Types of Performative Utterance.” In: I. Berlin et al (eds.). Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harnish, R.M. (2002). Are Performative Utterances Declarations?. In: Grewendorf, G., Meggle, G. (eds) Speech Acts, Mind, and Social Reality. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 79. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0589-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0589-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-0861-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0589-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics