Abstract
It is generally accepted that a careful distinction must be drawn between theories of a language user’s competence and theories of a language user’s performance. The former theories describe what the user knows about the sentence of his language, whereas the latter theories describe how this knowledge is put to use in the task of producing or understanding particular sentences. This paper is concerned with problems involved in the second type of theory, and in particular, with the task of providing a model of the control system involved in sentence production. The total sequence of operations involved in the production of a sentence is assumed to be analyzable into at least three components: (a) the class of operations involved in determining the content of the message to be encoded, (b) the class of operations involved in converting the message to a sequence of morphemes, and (c) the class of operations involved in converting this morpheme sequence into the appropriate commands to the articulatory system. Only the second of these three components will be considered in this paper.
This paper was prepared while the author was a Research Fellow at the University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. The research reported was made possible by the generous technical assistance of the following people, to whom the author wishes to express his gratitude: R. B. Lees, Belan Togrol, D. Cuceloglu, Toshio Iritani. Miho Steinberg, P. Tanaka, J. Oki, E. E. Davis, N. Viernstein, M. Clyne and M. Garrett.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Chomsky, N., ‘On the Notion ‘Rule of Grammar’, in R. Jakobsen (ed.), Structure of Language and its Mathematical Axpects, Proc. 12th Symp. in App. Math., American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1961.
Chomsky, N., ‘Formal Properties of Grammars’, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II, Wiley, New York, 1963.
Evey, J., The Theory and Application of Pushdown Store Machines, Rep. No. NSF-10, Harvard Compl. Lab., Cambridge, 1963.
Fodor, J. A. and Garrett, M., ‘Some Syntactic Determinants of Sentential Complexity’, Perception and Psychophysics 2 (1967) 289–296.
Forster, K. I., Left-to-Right Processes in the Construction of Sentences, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1964.
Forster, K. I., ‘Left-to-Right Processes in the Construction of Sentences’, J. verb. Learn. verb. Behav. 5 (1966) 285–291. (a)
Forster, K. I., The Effect of Removal of Length Constraint on Sentence Completion Times’, J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav. (in press), 1966(b).
Forster, K. I., ‘Sentence Completion Latencies as a Function of Constituent Structure’, J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav. (in press), 1966 (c).
Forster, K. I., ‘Sentence Completion in Left- and Right-Branching Languages’, J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav. (in press), 1966 (d).
Greibach, S., ‘A New Normal-Form Theorem for Context-free Phrase Structure Grammar’, J. Assoc. Comp. Mach. 12 (1965) 42–52.
Guilford, J. P., ‘Three Faces of Intellect’, Amer. Psychologist 14 (1959) 469–479.
Johnson, N. F., ‘Linguistic Models and Functional Units of Language Behavior’, in S. Rosenberg (ed.), Directions in Psycholinguistics, Macmillan, New York, 1965.
Katz, J. J. and Postal, P. M., An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1964.
Maclay, H. and Osgood, C. E., ‘Hesitation Phenomena in Spontaneous English Speech’, Word 15 (1959) 19–44.
Mehler, J., ‘Some Effects of Grammatical Transformations on the Recall of English Sentences’, J. verb. Learn, verb. Behav. 2 (1963) 346–351.
Miller, G. A. and Chomsky, N., ‘Finitary Models of Language Users’, in R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. II, Wiley, New York, 1963.
Postal, P., ‘Limitations of Phrase Structure Grammars’, in J. A. Fodor and J. J. Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964.
Turner, E. A. and Rommetveit, R., ‘Experimental Manipulation of the Production of Active and Passive Voice in Children’, Language and Speech 10 (1967) 169–180.
Yngve, V. H., ‘A Model and an Hypothesis for Language Structure’, Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 104 (1960) 444–466.
Yngve, V. H., ‘The Depth Hypothesis’, in R. Jakobsen (ed.), Structure of Language and Its Mathematical Aspects, Proc. 12th Symp. in App. Math., American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1961.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Forster, K.I. (1974). Linguistic Structure and Sentence Production. In: Cherry, C. (eds) Pragmatic Aspects of Human Communication. Theory and Decision Library, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2180-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2180-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0520-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-2180-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive