Skip to main content

Saint Thomas’ Methodology in the Treatment of Positiones

  • Chapter
Saint Thomas and Platonism
  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

We will begin with the study of a text presented in the fifth article of the Quaestio de Spiritualibus Creaturis. 1 The question proposed is: ‘Is there some created spiritual substance which is not united to a body?’ The body of the article falls into three main divisions:

  1. 1.

    1. The primi naturales philosophi who acknowledged only the existence of corporeal nature;

  2. 2.

    2. The posteriores philosophi who arrived at a knowledge of incorporeal substances;

  3. 3.

    3. We ourselves, ‘nos,’ the Christians, who likewise maintain the existence of spiritual being but for other reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Q.U. De Anima, 6, c.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Other examples are to be found in In Meta. [5] [20]; In I Meta., 3 [61–63].

    Google Scholar 

  3. In I Meta., 5 [C 97].

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Sp. Creat., 3, c. [K 40–41].

    Google Scholar 

  5. De Sub. Sep. [1]. Cf. De Sub. Sep., 7 [P 49].

    Google Scholar 

  6. In I Meta., 3 [61–63].

    Google Scholar 

  7. C.G. [10]

    Google Scholar 

  8. S.T., I, 118, 3, c.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.T. [26]

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.T., I, 49, 3, c.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Contra Retra. a Rel. Ingr., 6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Averroes: ‘Et est positio falsa… et hoc secundum radices eorum, quoniam ipsi dicunt (Dest. Dest., 14 [119B]);… haec positio est ex radicibus….’ (Ibid. [118C]).

    Google Scholar 

  13. In Sent. [20]; cf. Averroes: ‘Et hoc manifestum est ei qui considerat funda-mentum Aristotelis,’ De Sub. Orb., 1 [5vK].

    Google Scholar 

  14. In I De An., 6 [P 71].

    Google Scholar 

  15. In Meta. [32]; cf. In Eth. [21]; In Meta. [34]; In De An. [31]; In I De An., 6 [P 71].

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Sp. Creat., 3, c. [K 42–45].

    Google Scholar 

  17. De Sub. Sep. [1].

    Google Scholar 

  18. In Sent. [20].

    Google Scholar 

  19. E.g. S.T., I, 3, 8, c.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fabro, La Nozione Metafisica di Partecipazione secondo S. Tomaso D’Aquino, pp. 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  21. . S.T. [3].

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Chapter II.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. T. [56].

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.T. [58].

    Google Scholar 

  25. C.G. [5].

    Google Scholar 

  26. . S.T. [3].

    Google Scholar 

  27. De Ver. [17].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1970 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Henle, R.J. (1970). Saint Thomas’ Methodology in the Treatment of Positiones. In: Saint Thomas and Platonism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3167-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3167-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3169-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-3167-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics