Skip to main content

Flow and flow reserve by parametric imaging

  • Chapter
Advances in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography

Part of the book series: Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine ((DICM,volume 137))

  • 51 Accesses

Summary

9 mongrel dogs were instrumented with electromagnetic flow probes (EMF) to measure coronary blood flow through the left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX) coronary arteries at rest and after maximal, adenosine induced coronary vasodilation. Relative coronary blood flow was determined by parametric imaging using digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Transmural myocardial perfusion of the LAD and LCX beds was determined with tracer-labeled microspheres. Coronary flow reserve (CFR, maximal coronary blood flow divided by resting blood flow) was calculated under control conditions and after constriction of the proximal LAD or LCX by a screw occluder. Coronary blood flow showed a good correlation between EMF and microspheres (correlation coefficient r= 0.87, p< 0.001) with a standard error of estimate (SEE) of 0.78 ml/gm/min. CFR also showed a good correlation between EMF and microspheres (r= 0.82, p< 0.001) with an SEE of 0.93. There was a moderate correlation between EMF and DSA (r= 0.68, p< 0.001) with a SEE of 1.35 (=40% of the mean CFR). The correlation coefficient between microspheres and DSA was 0.54 (p< 0.01) with an SEE of 1.46 (=39% of the mean CFR). Thus determination of CFR by parametric imaging is associated with large variations that are greater than variations also inherent in the two reference techniques. This low precision is probably due to the superposition of different cardiac structures in the two-dimensional display of a three-dimensional perfusion zone, potentially in-homogeneous contrast distribution, poor temporal resolution of the onceper-cycle imaging, inadequate displacement of blood by contrast material, and perturbations of flow caused by contrast material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Vogel RA, LeFree MT, Bates ER, et al. Application of digital techniques to selective coronary arteriography: Use of myocardial contrast appearance time to measure coronary flow reserve. Am Heart J 1984; 107: 153–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodgson JMcB, LeGrand V, Bates ER, et al. Validation in dogs of a rapid digital angiographic technique to measure relative coronary blood flow during routine cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 188–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. LeGrand V, Aueron FM, Bates ER, et al. Value of exercise radionuclide ventriculography and thallium-201 scintigraphy in evaluating successful coronary angioplasty: Comparison with coronary flow reserve, translesional gradient and percent diameter stenosis. Eur Heart J 1987; 8: 329–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cusma JT, Toggart EJ, Folts JD, et al. Digital subtraction angiographic imaging of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1987; 75: 461–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zijlstra F, van Ommeren J, Reiber JHC, Serruys PW. Does the quantitative assessment of coronary artery dimensions predict the physiologic significance of a coronary stenosis? Circulation 1987; 75: 1154–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson RF, Marcus ML, White CW. Prediction of the physiologic significance of coronary arterial lesions by quantitative lesion geometry in patients with limited coronary artery disease. Circulation 1987; 75: 723–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Marcus ML, Wilson RF, White CW. Methods of measurement of myocardial blood flow in patients: a critical review. Circulation 1987; 76: 245–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Klocke FJ. Measurements of coronary flow reserve: defining pathophysiology versus making decisions about patient care. Circulation 1987; 76: 1183–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gould KL, Goldstein RA, Mullani NA, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VIII: Clinical feasibility of positron cardiac imaging without a cyclotron using generator-produced rubidium-82. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 7: 775–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mancini GBJ, McGillem MJ, DeBoe SF, Gallagher KP. The diastolic hyperemic flow versus pressure relation. A new index of coronary stenosis severity and flow reserve. Circulation, 1989; 80: 941–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heymann MA, Payne BD, Hoffman JIE, Rudolph AM. Blood flow measurements with radionuclide-labeled particles. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1977; 20: 55–79.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mancini GBJ, Higgins CB. Digital subtraction angiography: a review of cardiac applications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1985; 18: 111–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nissen SE, Elion JL, Booth DC, Evans J, DeMaria AN. Value and limitations of computer analysis of digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1986; 73: 562–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nishimura RA, Rogers PJ, Holmes DR Jr, Gehring DG, Bove AA. Assessment of myocardial perfusion by videodensitometry in the canine model. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 89–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Utley J, Carlson EL, Hoffmann JIE, Martinez HM, Buckberg GD. Total and regional myocardial blood flow measurements with 25 micron, 15 micron, 9 micron and filtered 110 micron diameter microspheres and antipyrine in dogs and sheep. Circ Res 1974; 34: 391405.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Legrand V, Mancini GBJ, Bates ER, Hodgson JMcB, Gross MD, Vogel RA. Comparative study of coronary flow reserve, coronary anatomy and results of radionuclide exercise tests in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8: 1022–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman HZ, DeBoe SF, McGillem MJ, Mancini GBJ. The immediate effects of iohexol on coronary blood flow and myocardial function in vivo. Circulation 1986; 74: 1416–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Austin RE Jr, Aldea GS, Coggins DL, Flynn AE, Hoffman JIE. Profound variation of regional coronary flow reserve. Circulation 1988; 78 (Suppl 2): II-82 (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hess OM, McGillem MJ, DeBoe SF, Pinto IMF, Gallagher KP, Mancini GBJ. Determination of coronary flow reserve by parametric imaging. Circulation, 1990; 82: 1438–48. Comment in: Circulation 1990; 82: 1533–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mancini, J.G.B. (1993). Flow and flow reserve by parametric imaging. In: Reiber, J.H.C., Serruys, P.W. (eds) Advances in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography. Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol 137. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1854-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1854-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4819-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-1854-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics