Skip to main content

On Situations and States of Affairs

  • Chapter
Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences

Part of the book series: Contributions to Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 8))

Abstract

There is a skeleton in the closet of philosophical logic.

Response to Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock, “On Husserl’s Distinction between State of Affairs (Sachverhalt) and Situation of Affairs (Sachlage)”, September 27, 1985, Pittsburgh, Conference on Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • HusserPs distinction between state of affairs (Sachverhalt) and situation (Sachlage) is expounded primarily in section 59 of Experience and Judgment (edited by Ludwig Landgrebe; translated by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks; Northwestern University Press, Evanston, 1973; German original, 1948, posthumous). The correlative distinction between predicative and prepredicative experience is also expounded primarily in that text and is the major theme of the work. My discussion here is based on that text. On various notions of state of affairs in turn-of-the-century Austrian philosophy, see: Kevin Mulligan, “‘Wie die Sachen sich zu einander verhalten’ inside and outside the Tractatus’”, Teoria 2 (1985) 145–174; Edgar Morscher, “Propositions and States of Affairs in Austrian Philosophy before Wittgenstein”, photocopied, 1985. I have benefited from discussion at the Conference, in particular from remarks by Professors Rosado, Dagfinn Føllesdal, Charles Harvey, J. N. Mohanty, Thomas Seebohm, and Donn Welton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, D.W. (1991). On Situations and States of Affairs. In: Seebohm, T.M., Føllesdal, D., Mohanty, J.N. (eds) Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2580-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2580-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5138-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-2580-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics