Skip to main content

Logical Structure in Syntactic Structure: The Case of Hungarian

  • Chapter
Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure

Part of the book series: Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 40))

Abstract

According to standard assumptions of generative theory, operators are subject to the following universal principle of scope interpretation:

  1. (1)

    An operator c-commands its scope.1

Sentences are checked for principle (1) when they enter the semantic interpretive component of grammar. Principle (1) is either satisfied in syntax already: at D-structure, by base-generation, or S-structure, as a result of Move WH; or is only met at LF, the abstract level of representation directly feeding into semantic interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, W. and de Mey, S. (eds.): 1986, Topic, Focus, and Configurationality, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, F.: 1984, ‘Verbal Modifiers as Argument Taking Predicates: Complex Verbs in Hungarian’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 25, 3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, F. and Komlósy, A.: 1983, ‘Néhány lépés a magyar szórend megértése felé’, ms., Linguistic Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, M.: 1985, ‘Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D.: 1986, ‘Focus in Hungarian’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and Moravcsik, J.: 1974, ‘Branching Quantifiers, English and Montague Grammar’, Theoretical Linguistics 1.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, J. and May, R.: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing’, The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, J.: 1981, ‘Aspects of Hungarian Syntax and the Theory of Grammar’, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, J.: 1985, Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian, Foris, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J.: 1982, ‘Logical Relations in Chinese, and the Theory of Grammar’,Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunyadi, L.: 1981, ‘A nyelvi polaritás kifejezése a magyarban’, dissertation for the candidate’s degree, Kossuth Lajos University, Debrecen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunyadi, L.: 1982, ‘Remarks on the Syntax and Semantics of Topic and Focus in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, 107–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kálmán, L. et al.: 1986, aa‘Hocus, Focus, and Verb Types in Hungarian Infinitive Constructions’, in: Abraham and Mey (eds.), 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenesei, I.: 1989, ‘Logikus-e a magyar szórend?’, Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok XVII, 105–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K.: 1986,aa ‘The Order and Scope of Operators in the Hungarian Sentence’, in: Abraham and Mey (eds.), 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K.: 1987a, ‘Configurationality in Hungarian’, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht, and Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K.: 1987b, ‘Eliminating the Configurationality Parameter’ unpublished, Linguistic Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, K.: 1987c, ‘Még egyszer a magyar mondat hangsúlyozásárol es intonációjáról’, Nyelvtudományi Közlemények (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1977, ‘The Grammar of Quantification’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R.: 1983, Logical Form Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T.: 1976, ‘The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora’, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1981, ‘The Semantics of Topic-Focus Articulation’, in: J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Matematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1983a, ‘Focussing Properties, or the Trap of First Order’, Theoretical Linguistics 10, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1983b, ‘The Possessor that Ran Away from Home’, The Linguistic Review 3, 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: 1986, ‘From the Definiteness Effect to Lexical Integrity’, in: W. Abraham and S. de Mey (eds.), 321–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E.: 1982, ‘The NP Cycle’, Linguistic Inquiry 13, 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kiss, K.É. (1992). Logical Structure in Syntactic Structure: The Case of Hungarian. In: Huang, CT.J., May, R. (eds) Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3472-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3472-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-7923-1636-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3472-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics