Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Technology, Risk, and Society ((RISKGOSO,volume 6))

Abstract

The important contribution that scientists make to agenda setting has not been sufficiently recognized in scholarly literature. The students of agenda setting have only recently come to realize the importance of ideas that come from sources outside the government. There has been little research that identifies the scientific community as a source of agenda topics. While there is a large literature devoted to the relationship between science and government, it has generally been concluded that there is no scientific elite with an undue influence upon government. Instead, the principal concern has been the perversion of science by politics. The activity of subgroups of scientists acting as entrepreneurs to set the public agenda on topics in which they have a strong interest has not been widely acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bush, V. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callendar, G.S. 1938. “The Artificial Production of Carbon Dioxide and its Influence on Temperature.” Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meterological Society 64: 223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R.W., and C.W. Elder. 1972. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R.W., and C.W. Elder. 1983. Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-Building (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R.W., J. Keith-Ross, and M.H. Ross. 1976. “Agenda-Building as a Comparative Political Process.” American Political Science Review 70: (1): 126–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, F.L., and W.G. Skogan. 1989. “Agenda-Setting: Convergent and Divergent Voice Models of the Rise and Fall of Policy Issues.” Northwestern University, Unpublished Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. 1972. “Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle.” The Public Interest 28: 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. 1972. “Roots of the New Conservation Movement”. Vol. 6 of Perspectives in American History. D. Fleming and B. Bailyn, eds. Cambridge: Charles Warren Center for Studies in American History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J.L. 1955. The Political Process. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R.,and C. Wright, eds. 1964. Scientists and National Policy-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H., H. Cortner, and M. Landy. 1990. “The Political Agenda.” In Paul E. Waggoner, eds., Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H., and C. Mintzer. 1990. How Atmospheric Research Changed the Political Climate. Tucson, AZ. Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy Issue Paper No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeling, C.D. 1987. Measurements of the Concentration of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide at Mauna Loa Observatory, Hawaii, 1958-1986. Final Report for the Carbon Dioxide Information and Analysis Center. Oak Ridge, TN: Martin-Marietta Energy Systems Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J.W. 1984. Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E.O., and David Knoke. 1987. The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A.J. ‘1925’ 1956. Elements of Physical Biology. ‘Baltimore: Williams &Wilkins.’ Reprint. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A. 1951. Muddy Waters: The Army Engineers and the Nation’ s Rivers. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKibben, B. 1989. “The End of Nature,” The New Yorker, p. 58. A review of the National Newspaper Index bears out the fact that 1988 articles focus on the Hansen testimony, OMB’ s altering of it and the debate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, O. 1989. The Greenhouse Climate of Fear. The Washington Post. January 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, M.J., and F.S. Rowland. 1974. “Stratospheric Sink for Chlorofluoromethanes: Chlorine Atom Catalyzed Destruction of Ozone.” Nature 249: 810–812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mukerji, C. 1989. A Fragile Power: Scientists and the State. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. 1987. Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology. New York: Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, B.J. 1984. Making an Issue of Child Abuse: Political Agenda Setting for Social Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G.B., and B.W. Hogwood. 1985. “In Search of the Issue Attention Cycle.” The Journal of Politics 47: 238–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D.K. 1964. “The Scientific Establishment.” In Scientists and National Policy-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D.K. 1965. The Scientific Estate. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V., R.J. Cicerone, H.B. Singh, and J.T. Kiehl. 1985. “Trace Gas Trends and Their Potential Role in Climate Change.” Journal of Geophysical Research 90: 5547–5566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raynaud, R., and J. Barnola. 1985. “An Antarctic Ice Core Reveals Atmospheric CO2 Variations Over the Past Few Centuries.” Nature 315: 309–311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Redford, E.S. 1960. “A Case Analysis of Congressional Activity: Civil Aviation: 1957-58. Journal of Politics 22(2): 228–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, R., and H.E. Suess. 1957. “Carbon Dioxide Exchange Between Atmosphere and Ocean and the Question of an Increase of Atmospheric CO2 During the Past Decades.” Tellus 9: 18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P., and M. Fiering. 1989. “Climate Change: Do We Know Enough to Act?” Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, (Winter): 15–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, W. 1985. Environmental Politics and Policy. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. 1989. Global Warming: Are We Entering the Greenhouse Century? San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D.A. 1971. Beyond the Stable State. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H. 1985. “Why Scientists are Speaking Out.” New Scientist (21 Nov): 28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Hearing on Greenhouse Effect and Global Climate Change. 100th Cong., 2nd sess. June 23, 1988. S. Hearing 100–461, pt 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A.H. 1986. “Central Problems in the Management of Innovation.” Management Science 32(5): 590–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.L. 1977. “Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate: A Theory of Problem Selection.” British Journal of Political Science 7(4): 423–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.L. 1981. “The Diffusion of Knowledge, Policy Communities and Agenda Setting: The Relationship Between Knowledge and Power.” In John L. Tropman, et. al., eds., New Strategic Perspectives on Social Policy. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. 1982. “The Scientific Power Elite-a Chimera: the Deinstitutionalization and Politicization of Science.” In N. Elias, H. Martin, and R. Whitley, eds., Scientific Establishment and Hierarchies. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. 1964. “Scientists and Politics: The Rise of an Apolitical Elite.” In R. Gilpin and C. Wright, eds., Scientists and National Policy-Making. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Marvin Waterstone

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingram, H., Brinton Milward, H., Laird, W. (1992). Scientists and Agenda Setting: Advocacy and Global Warming. In: Waterstone, M. (eds) Risk and Society: The Interaction of Science, Technology and Public Policy. Technology, Risk, and Society, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3634-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3634-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5613-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3634-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics