Abstract
What is truth? What character is it that we ascribe to an opinion or a statement when we call it ‘true’? This is our first question, but before trying to answer it let us reflect for a moment on what it means. For we must distinguish one question, “what is truth?”, from the quite different question “what is true?” If a man asked what was true, the sort of answer he might hope for would either be as complete an enumeration as possible of all truths, i.e., an encyclopaedia, or else a test or criterion of truth, a method by which he could know a truth from a falsehood. But what we are asking for is neither of these things, but something much more modest; we do not hope to learn an infallible means of distinguishing truth from falsehood but simply to know what it is that this word ‘true’ means. It is a word which we all understand, but if we try to explain it, we can easily get involved, as the history of philosophy shows, in a maze of confusion.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
So Kant, Kritik der reinen Verrnunft, A57-B82.
Harold H. Joachim, The Nature of Truth (Oxford, 1906). p. 12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramsey, F.P., Rescher, N., Majer, U. (1991). The Nature of Truth. In: Rescher, N., Majer, U. (eds) On Truth. Episteme, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3738-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3738-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-5662-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-011-3738-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive