Skip to main content

Classifying Image Features in the Last Screening Mammograms Prior to Detection of a Malignant Mass

  • Chapter
Digital Mammography

Part of the book series: Computational Imaging and Vision ((CIVI,volume 13))

Abstract

Survival from breast cancer is directly related to the stage at diagnosis. The earlier the detection, the higher chances of successful treatment [1]. In an attempt to improve early detection, a study has been undertaken to analyze the screening mammograms of breast cancer patients taken prior to cancer detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C.J. Vyborny and M. L. Giger (1994) Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 162, pp 699–708.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. L. Ng and W. F. Bischof (1992) Automated detection and classification of breast tumors. Computer and Biomedical Research, vol. 25, pp 218–237.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. L. Giger, P. Lu, Z. Huo, U. Bick, C. J. Vyborny, R. A. Schmidt, W. Zheng, C. E. Metz, D Wolverton, R. M. Nishikawa, W. Zouras and K Doi (1994) CAD in digital mammography: computerized detection and classification of masses. In: A.G. Gale et al (eds.), Digital Mammography, Elsevier, pp 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Brzakovic, P. Brzakovic and M. Neskovic (1993) An approach to automated screening of mammograms. SPIE, vol. 1905, pp 690–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. P. Kegelmeyer (1994) Evaluation of stellate lesion detection in a standard mammogram data set. In: K.W. Bowyer and S. Astley (eds.), State of the Art in Digital Mammographic Image Analysis, World Scientific Pub. Co., pp 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Karssemeijer (1994) Recognition of stellate lesions in digital mammograms. In: A.G. Gale et al (eds.), Digital Mammography, Elsevier, pp 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Petrick, H-P Chan, B. Sahiner, D. Wei (1996) An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection. IEEE trans. on Medical Imaging, vol. 15, No. 1, pp 59–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology Vol. 184, pp 613–617.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C.J. Savage, A.G. Gale, E.F. Pawley, A.R.M. Wilson (1994) To err is human, to compute divine? In: A.G. Gale et al (eds.), Digital Mammography, Elsevier, pp 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.A. Krupinski, C.F. Nodine (1994) Gaze duration predicts the locations of missed lesions in mammography. In: A.G. Gale et al (eds.), Digital Mammography, Elsevier, pp 399–404.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sallam, K. Bowyer (1996) Detecting abnormal densities in mammograms by comparison to previous screenings. In: K. Doi et al (eds.), Digital Mammography’96, Elsevier Science, pp 417–420.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Aghdasi, R. K. Ward and B. Palcic (1993) Restoration of mammographie images in the presence of signal-dependent noise. SPIE, vol. 1905, pp 740–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Nesbitt, (1995) Automated Detection of Microcalcifications in Digitized Mammogram Film Images, M.A.Sc thesis, Elect. Eng. Dept., Univ. of British Columbia, pp 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Doudkine, C. Macaulay, N. Poulin, B. Palcic (1995) Nuclear texture measurements in image cytometry. Pathologica, vol. 87, pp 286–299.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.W. Byng, N.F. Boyd, E. Fishell, R.A. Jong, M.J. Yaffe (1996) Automated analysis of mammographie densities. Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 41, pp 909–923.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Sameti (1998) Detection of Soft Tissue Abnormalities in Mammographie Images for Early Detection of Breast Cancer, PhD Thesis, E&CE Dept, University of British Columbia (in progress).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Sameti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sameti, M., Morgan-Parkes, J., Ward, R.K., Palcic, B. (1998). Classifying Image Features in the Last Screening Mammograms Prior to Detection of a Malignant Mass. In: Karssemeijer, N., Thijssen, M., Hendriks, J., van Erning, L. (eds) Digital Mammography. Computational Imaging and Vision, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5318-8_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-6234-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-5318-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics