Skip to main content

Ultimate Results of the Deduction

  • Chapter
A Study of Glossematics
  • 57 Accesses

Abstract

After a kind of recapitulation of the earliest chapters of OSG, in the light and in the terms of the expositions which have followed since, in Chapter 20 of OSG entitled: “Entities of the Analysis”, Hjelmslev touches on two points which deserve more attention. Briefly put they are these:

  1. 1)

    in the syntagmatic deduction: the further reduction of the phoneme to still smaller entities.

  2. 2)

    in the paradigmatic deduction: the completely analogous categorical structure of the two planes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. in the syntagmatic deduction: the further reduction of the phoneme to still smaller entities.

    Google Scholar 

  2. in the paradigmatic deduction: the completely analogous categorical structure of the two planes.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Hjelmslev, Grundtraek al det danke udtrykssystem med saerligt kenblik p4 siedet. Selskab for Nordisk Filologi, Aarsberetning for 1948–49–50, pp. 18, 19. Translation mine.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Hjelmslev, Quelques ré/lexions sur le système phonique de l’indo-européen. Mélanges Linguistiques offerts à M. Holger Pedersen. Acta Jutlandica IX, 1. 1937, p. 39, 40, 41.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. also ‘Phonemics’, by the same author, Archiv f. Vergl. Phonetik, V, 1951, p. 170–200.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Further: “To me it appears dangerously easy to fall into error when to support a theory, a linguist must hear things that ‘had to be there’ - particularly when the items ”heard“ are silent” (Kenneth L. Pike, More on Grammatical Prerequisites, Word, 8, 1952, p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eli Fischer-Jorgensen, Glossematics. Lecture in the Washington Linguistic Club, 26 March 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. also the same author in Phonemics, Archiv. f. Vergl. Phonetik, V, 1951, pp. 170–200. Esp. p. 22 (of the translated reprint).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1965 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Siertsema, B. (1965). Ultimate Results of the Deduction. In: A Study of Glossematics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8796-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-8796-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-011-8161-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-8796-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics