Skip to main content

Melchior Hofmann: A Prophetic Layman

  • Chapter
Dutch Anabaptism
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

The early evangelical or Sacramentarian movement took root deeply in the soil of the Low Countries which had been well prepared by the Brethren of the Common Life and Erasmian humanism. Stimulated by influences from Wittenberg, the evangelical movement went beyond Luther in the break with Rome, partly through the influence of men like Karlstadt. However, because the influence of the Strassburg and Swiss reformers was not so strong during the first decade of the Reformation, and because of the prominence of Luther, all inquisition efforts, even in the Low Countries, seemed to concentrate on Martin Luther during the first years. He was given the credit, or the blame, for whatever transpired here and there. Luther was hated and despised by the Catholics, admired and worshiped by his followers, and scorned and mistrusted by the radical reformers and the disappointed humanists. Among the many who were disillusioned about Luther, one was predestined to play a significant role in the further development of the Sacramentarian movement. This was the furrier Melchior Hofmann who had become an ardent follower of Luther and a zealous evangelist. Dissatisfied, however, he turned against Luther in a manner similar to Karlstadt. For both, Luther did not go far enough in his return to the Scriptures and in his break with tradition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Otto Pohrt, Reformationsgeschichte Livlands (Leipzig, 1928), 35 f., 46 ff., 64–67. Good as a brief survey. Hofmann’s story is presented in a biased manner.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Special books on Hofmann are: Friedrich Otto zur Linden, Melchior Hofmann: ein Prophet der Wiedertäufer (Haarlem, 1885), 86–103;

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. I. Leendertz, Melchior Hofmann (Haarlem, 1883 );

    Google Scholar 

  4. Peter Kawerau, Melchior Hofmann als religiöser Denker (Haarlem, 1954);

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. N. Krohn, Geschichte der fanatischen und enthusiastischen Wiedertäufer...(Leipzig, 1785 );

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abraham Hulshof, Geschiedenis van de Doopsgezinden to Straatsburg... (Amsterdam, 1905).

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. O. zur Linden, op. cit.,100, 109–113

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. A. Cornelius, Geschichte des Münsterischen Aufruhrs II, (Leipzig, 1855 ), 292;

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. I. Leendertz, op. cit.,119–123.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. I. Leendertz, op. cit.,123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Barge, Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt,II, 398 f.;

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Kochs, “Anfänge der ostfriesischen Reformation,” JGKAE, III,(1920), 34 f.

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. H. Williams, The Radical Reformation, 211 ff. General treatments of the Reformation of Strassburg are: Gustav Anrich, “Die Strassburger Reformation” in Schriften VfR 36 jrg., Erstes Stück (Leipzig, 1918 );

    Google Scholar 

  14. T. W. Röhrich, Geschichte der Reformation im Elsass I (1832).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Barge, Andreas Bodenstein von Karlstadt, II, 207–216.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Corpus Schwenckfeldianorum V (Leipzig, 1916) 522 f.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. W. Röhrich, “Zur Geschichte der Strassburger Wiedertäufer,” Niedners Zeitschrift für historische Theologie, 1860, 2–121;

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. W. Röhrich, Geschichte der Reformation im Elsass, II (1832), 90, 455.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eduard Meiners, Oostvrieschlandts kerkelyke geschiedenisse... (Groningen, 1738) I, 49 ff.,109 ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kochs, op. cit.: Summa vnde bekenninghe Christliker leer der predicanten in Oostfrieslandt... (1528), 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. A. Cornelius, Der Antheil Ostfrieslands... 57–59

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eggerik Beninga, Volledige chronik van Oostfriesland... (Emden, 1723), 652.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gespräch mit Karl Barth in Stimme,15. Dez., 1963, 15. Jhrg. 753 f.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rollin S. Armour, Anabaptist Baptism (Scottdale, Pa. 1967) constitutes the first comprehensive study of the subject.

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Kochs, op. cit.,I, Vol. 19, chapter “Quellen und ihre Bearbeitung” 109–137;

    Google Scholar 

  26. K. Vos, “Obbe Philipsz,” DB (Leiden, 1917), 124–138.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cornelius Krahn, Menno Simons...,(Karlsruhe, 1926), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Honderd jaren uit de geschiedenis der Hervorming en der Hervormde kerk in Friesland (Leeuwarden, 1876), 41. Was repeated by K. Vos, Menno Simons,(Leiden, 1914), 27

    Google Scholar 

  29. E. W. Kohls, “Ein Sendbrief Melchior Hofmanns aus dem Jahre 1534” in ThZ, XVII, Heft 5, Sept.-Oct., (1961), 356–465.

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. J. Kiwiet, Pilgram Marbeck (Kassel, 1957 ), 47–51;

    Google Scholar 

  31. F. H. Littell, The Anabaptist View of the Church (Boston, 1958), 24 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. Vos, “Wat zijn bondgenooten!” in DB (vol. 54, 1917 ), 82–88.

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. Verheus, Kroniek en kerygma. Een theologische Studie over Geschichtbibel van Sebastiaan Franck... (Arnhem, 1958) 41 ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walter Nigg, Das ewige Reich. Geschichte einer Sehnsucht und einer Enttäuschung (Zürich: Eugen Rentsch Verlag, 1944), 215 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Hirsch, Die Reichgottesbegriffe des neueren europäischen Denkens (1921), 7;

    Google Scholar 

  36. Franz Lau, Luthers Lehre von den beiden Reichen (Berlin, 1953; Friedrich Gogarten, “Die Lehre von den zwei Reichen und das natürliche Gesetz,” Deutsche Theologie (Stuttgart, 1935);

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gustaf Törnvall, Geistliches und weltliches Regiment bei Luther. Studien zu Luthers Weltbild und Gesellschaftsverständnis (Munich, 1947);

    Google Scholar 

  38. Karl Barth, “Evangelium und Gesetz,” Theol. Existenz heute. Heft 32 (Munich, 1935 );

    Google Scholar 

  39. Heinrich Bornkamm, Luthers Lehre von den zwei Reichen im Zusammenhang seiner Theologie ( Gütersloh: Gerd Mohn, 1960 );

    Google Scholar 

  40. Harold Diem, Luthers Lehre von den zwei Reichen, untersucht von seinem Verständnis der Bergpredigt (1938);

    Google Scholar 

  41. P. Althaus, “Luthers Lehre von den zwei Reichen im Feuer der Kritik,” Lutherjahrbuch 24 (1957);

    Google Scholar 

  42. B. Moeller, Reichstadt und Reformation (Gütersloh, 1962), 43 ff.;

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. Kreider, “The Anabaptists and the Civil Authorities of Strassbourg, 1525–1555,” in Church History. Vol. XXIV, No. 2, (June, 1955 ), 99–118;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. H. Hermelink, Der Toleranzgedanke im Reformationszeitalter VfR (Leipzig, 1908 ).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1968 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krahn, C. (1968). Melchior Hofmann: A Prophetic Layman. In: Dutch Anabaptism. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0609-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0609-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-015-0131-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-0609-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics