Skip to main content

The structure of international environmental agreements

  • Chapter
International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change

Abstract

Climate change (asymmetrically) affects all countries. Hence, the reduction of CO2 concentration in the atmosphere (asymmetrically) benefits most, if not all, countries. However, each country individually bears the (sometimes relevant) cost of domestic policies designed to control greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions. Moreover, most world countries have only a minor impact on total global emissions. These asymmetries, in benefits vs costs, in actions vs outcomes, are the source of the many difficulties in achieving an international agreement on climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Barrett, S. (1994) Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 878–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1995) Trade Restrictions in International Environmental Agreements. London: London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1997a) Heterogeneous international environmental agreements. In Carraro, C. (Ed.), International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1997b) Towards a theory of international cooperation. In Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (Eds), New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., Levi, M.D. and de Meza, D. (1992) Creating a good atmosphere: minimum participation for tackling the greenhouse effect. Economica, 60, 282–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, F (1994) Sequential Formation of Coalitions in Games with Externalities and Fixed Payoff Division, presented at the CORE-FEEM Conference on Non-Cooperative Coalition Formation’. Louvain, 27–28, Feb. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, F (1997) Noncooperative Models of Coalition Formation in Games with Spillovers. In: Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (Eds), New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botteon, M. and Carraro, C. (1997a) Burden-sharing and coalition stability in environmental negotiations with asymmetric countries. In Carraro, C. (ed.), International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botteon, M. and Carraro, C. (1997b) Strategies for environmental negotiations: issue linkage with heterogeneous countries. In Folmer, H. and Hanley, N. (Eds), Game Theory and the Global Environment. Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Moriconi, F (1997) Endogenous Formation of Environmental Coalitions, paper prepared for the 1st World Congress of Environmental Economists, Venice, 24–26 June, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (1992) The international protection of the environment: voluntary agreements among sovereign countries. In: Dasgupta, P. and Maler, K. G. (Eds), The Economics of Transnational Commons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (1993) Strategies for the international protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics, 52, 309–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (1995) Policy coordination for sustainability: commitments, transfers, and linked negotiations. In: Goldin, I. and Winters, A. (Eds), The Economics of Sustainable Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (1996) International coordination of environmental policies and stability of global environmental agreements. In: Bovenberg, L. and Cnossen, S. (Eds), Public Economics and the Environment in an Imperfect World. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (1997) R&D cooperation and the stability of international environmental agreements. In Carraro, C. (Ed.), International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (1998) International environmental agreements. Incentives and political economy. European Economic Review, 42, 561–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro, C. and Soubeyran, A. (1995) R&D Cooperation, Innovation Spillovers and Firms’ Location in a Model of Environmental Policy paper presented at the EARIE Conference, Juan Les Pins, 3–6 September, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesar, H. and De Zeeuw, A. (1994) Issue linkage in global environmental problems. In: Xepapadeas, A. (Ed.), Economic Policy for the Environment and Natural Resources. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander, P. and Tulkens, H. (1993) Strategically stable cost-sharing in an economic-ecological negotiations process In: Mäler, K. G. (Ed.), International Environmental Problems: an Economic Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chander, P. and Tulkens, H. (1994) A Core-Theoretical Solution for the Design of Cooperative Agreements on Trans-frontier Pollution, paper presented at the 50th IIPF Congress, Harvard, 22–25 August, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, M.S. (1994) Farsighted Coalitional Stability. University of Chicago: Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compte, O. and Jehiel, P. (1997) International negotiations and dispute resolution Mechanisms: the case of environmental negotiations. In: Carraro, C. (Ed.), International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currarini, S. and Tulkens, H. (1997) Core-Theoretic and Political Stability of International Agreements on Transfrontier Pollution, CORE Discussion Paper, Louvain-la-Neuve.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont, C.A. and Gabszewicz, J.J. (1986) On the stability of collusion. In: Matthewson, G.F. and Stiglitz, J.E. (Eds), New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure. New York: MacMillan Press, pp. 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Aspremont, C.A., Jacquemin, A., Gabszewicz, J.J. and Weymark, J. (1983) On the stability of collusive price leadership. Canadian Journal of Economics, 16, 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donsimoni, M.P., Economides, N.S. and Polemarchakis, H.M. (1986) Stable cartels. International Economic Review, 27, 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echia, G. and Mariotti, M. (1997) The stability of international environmental coalitions with farsighted countries: some theoretical observations. In: Carraro, C. (Ed.), International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser, S. and Kverndokk, S. (1992) The Global Warming Game: Simulation of a CO2 Reduction Agreement. GEC Working paper 92–10, CSERGE, University College of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folmer, H., van Mouche, P. and Ragland, S. (1993) Interconnected games and international environmental problems. Environmental Resource Economics, 3, 313–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968) The tragedy of commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. and Baden, J. (1977) Managing the Commons. New York: Freeman & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. and Kurz, M. (1983) Endogenous formation of coalitions. Econometrica, 51, 1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (1994) The formation of environmental coalitions. In: Carraro, C. (Ed.), Trade, Innovation, Environment. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, M. (1991) Global environmental problems: the effects of unilateral actions taken by one country. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20, 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, M. (1992) International environmental conventions: the case of uniform reductions of emissions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 141–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, M. (1994) Efficient climate policy in the presence of free-riders. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsoulacos, Y. (1997) R&D Spillovers, R&D cooperation, innovation and international environmental Agreements. In: Carraro, C. (Ed.), International Environmental Agreements: Strategic Policy Issues. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, H., Le Breton, M. and Weber, S. (1997) Stable coalition structures for the provision of public goods. In: Carraro, C. and Siniscalco, D. (Eds), New Directions in the Economic Theory of the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kverndokk, S. (1993) Global CO2 agreements: a cost-effective approach. Economic Journal, 14, 91–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton, M. and Weber, S. (1993) Stability of Coalition Structures and the Principle of Optimal Partitioning. Mimeo, GREQE, Aix-Marseille.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maler, K.G. (1990) International environmental problems. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6, 80–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, M. (1997) A model of agreements in strategic form games. Journal of Economic Theory, 73, 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, D. and Vohra, R. (1996) Equilibrium Binding Agreements. Boston University, Department of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Sargent, K. (1995) Management of transnational commons: coordination, publicness, and treaty formation. Land Economics, 71, 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulkens, H. (1998) Cooperation vs free-riding in international affairs: two approaches. In: Hanley, N. and Folmer, H. (Eds.), Game Theory and the Environment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ploeg, E. and De Zeeuw, A.J. (1992) International aspects of pollution control. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3, 117–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S. (1997) Stable coalition structures with externalities. Games and Economic Behaviour.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, S. and Shin, H. (1994) Endogenous Formation of Coalitions in Oligopoly: I. Theory. Mimeo, Dartmouth College.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carraro, C. (1999). The structure of international environmental agreements. In: Carraro, C. (eds) International Environmental Agreements on Climate Change. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (Feem) Series on Economics, Energy and Environment, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9169-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9169-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5155-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-015-9169-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics