Skip to main content

Goals and Critical Success Factors in a Problem Based Marketing Course

  • Chapter
Educational Innovation in Economics and Business VI

Part of the book series: Educational Innovation in Economics and Business ((EIEB,volume 6))

  • 81 Accesses

Abstract

During the last couple of years there has been an intense debate among Norwegian university teachers and students. The focus of this debate has been the students’ high drop out figures, poor examination results and the inefficiency of traditional learning methods. One major point in this debate is that university teachers claim that the students’ poor examination results are caused by their low motivation and insufficient as well as inefficient use of the time used on study activities. The students’ counter reaction is to put the blame on poor and demotivating pedagogical methods. Lectures in gigantic auditoriums with hundreds of students present represent a learning environment based on a philosophy more similar to recitation in the ancient cathedrals. The new generation of students — often called sound bite generation — demand pedagogical methods that to a greater extent can engage, stimulate, activate and put pressure on the students. One way to meet these requirements is a student-centered, independent resource-based learning, which facilitates flexibility to the timing, pace and place of learning (Ottewill & Jennings 1998). Accordingly, the students are expected to be responsible for organizing their own learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brinchman-Hansen, A. (1994). Prosjekt og PBL. Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T.E., & Kennedy, A.A. (1982). Corporate Cultures - The rites and Rituals of corporate Life. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estenstad, N. (1995). Benefits from PBL in the Teaching of Marketing, TOH-serien nr. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirch, D.P., & Carvalho, G. (1998). The Delivery of Accounting in the Problem-Based Learning Environment. In R. Milter, J.E. Stinson, W.H. Gijselaers, (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business III (pp. 169–188 ). Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhuis, J., & Van Witteloostuijn, A. (1998). Teaching and Organising: The Case of Problem-Based learning. In D.T. Tempelaar, F. Wiedersheim-Paul, & E. Gunnarsson, (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business II (pp. 171–189 ). Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, November-December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottewill, R., & Jennings, P.L. (1998). Open Learning versus Lecturing. In R. Milter, J.E. Stinson, & W.H. Gijselaers, (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business III, (pp. 169–188 ). Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti, V., Gunn, P.C., Day, J.C., & Coombs, G. (1998). Business 20/20; Ohio University’s Integrated Business Core. In R. Milter, J.E. Stinson, W.H. Gijselaers, (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business III (pp. 169–188 ).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Pettersen, R.C., (1992). PBL- konsept, modell, metode, ostfold. Vernepleierhegskole, Fredrikstad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, D., & Thomas, I.D. (1998). The Action Learning Partnership (ALPS) Model. In R. Muter, J.E. Stinson, & W.H. Gijselaers, (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business III (pp. 65–75 ). Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Solberg, S.L. (1995). Use of Problem-Based Learning in the Teaching of Marketing, TOHserien nr. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saderlund, M. (1998). Problem-Based Learning, Interpersonal Orientations and Learning Approaches. In D.T. Tempelaar, F. Wiedersheim-Paul, & E. Gunnarsson. (Eds.), Educational Innovation in Economics and Business II (pp. 155–169 ). Dordrecht, London, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. (1994). Problem-based Learning - How to Gain the Most from PBL. Waterdown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Estenstad, N.A., Solberg, S.L. (2002). Goals and Critical Success Factors in a Problem Based Marketing Course. In: Johannessen, T.A., Pedersen, A., Petersen, K. (eds) Educational Innovation in Economics and Business VI. Educational Innovation in Economics and Business, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1390-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1390-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5959-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-1390-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics