Skip to main content

Cognitive Science: Two Cultures or One?

  • Chapter
Metadebates on Science

Abstract

Cognitive science, a mixture of psychology, computer science, neurophysiology, linguistics and philosophy has been hailed by many as the first genuine science of cognitive phenomena. Its composition signals that the discipline employs methodologies of the ‘two cultures,’ of the natural sciences represented most clearly by neurophysiology and of the humanities represented by philosophy. Cognitive science, thus, becomes an interesting new area for the Erklären- Verstehen controversy. There are voices which, citing this methodological eclecticism, deny cognitive science the status of a separate discipline. Others disagree arguing that a ‘naturalized’ philosophy is not much different from psychology or even neuroscience. Many researchers believe that there is a central idea that unifies all the different approaches belonging to cognitive science. It is the idea represented by the model of algorithmic processing of information with all its related concepts and techniques. Thus the main goal of cognitive science in this view is to understand and explain the nature of perception, memory, learning, linguistic abilities, etc. by representing them in terms of their underlying computational processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dreyfus, H., Husserl Intentionality and Cognitive Science, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newell, A., Simon, H., “Computer science as empirical enquiry”, Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 19, 1976, pp. 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garfield, J., “Introduction”, in: Garfield. J. (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science: the Essential Readings, Paragon House, N.Y., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dennett, D., “Artificial Intelligence as Philosophy and as Psychology”, in: Garfield, J. (ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science: the Essential Readings, Paragon House, N.Y., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dreyfus, H., What computers can’t do: A critique of artificial reason, ( 2nd ed. ), Harper and Row, N.Y., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Searle, J., The Rediscovery of the Mind, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winograd, T., Flores, F., Understanding Computers and Cognition, Addison- Wesley, Reading MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Churchland, P.M., A Neurocomputational Perspective. The Structure of Mind and the Structure of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Searle, J., “Is the Brain’s Mind a Computer Program?” in: Scientific American, 262, no. 1, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Armstrong, D., A Materialist Theory of the Mind, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson and Co., Ltd., London, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fodor, J., The Modularity of Mind., MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland J. L. (eds.), Parallel distributed processing, Vol. 1 and 2. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Forrest, S. (ed.), Emergent Computation: Self-Organizing, Collective, and Cooperative Phenomena in Natural and Artificial Networks., MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Luhmann, N., Essays on Self-Reference, Columbia UP, N.Y., 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bielecki, M.W. (1999). Cognitive Science: Two Cultures or One?. In: Cornelis, G.C., Smets, S., Van Bendegem, J.P. (eds) Metadebates on Science. EINSTEIN MEETS MAGRITTE: An Interdisciplinary Reflection on Science, Nature, Art, Human Action and Society, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2245-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2245-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5242-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2245-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics