Skip to main content

The Graphic-Linguistic Distinction

Exploring Alternatives

  • Chapter
Thinking with Diagrams

Abstract

What properties, if any, distinguish graphical representations from linguistic representations? This paper looks for answers in the literature of philosophy, logic, artificial intelligence, and cognitive psychology, and extracts seven alternative binary classifications of representations that may characterize the graphic-linguistic boundary. We assess each alternative by two standards: (a) whether it extensionally fits the graphic-linguistic distinction, and (b) how far it explains the properties commonly attributed to graphic representations but not to linguistic ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. (1990). Visual Information and Valid Reasoning. In Zimmerman, W. (ed.) Visualization in Mathematics, 9–24. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. (1995). Heterogeneous Logic. In Glasgow, J. I., Narayanan, N. H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 211–234. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Hammer, E. (1995). Diagrams and the Concept of Logical System. In Barwise, J. and Allwein, G. (eds.) Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, 49–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Seligman, J. (1996). Information Flow in Distributed Systems. Manuscripts. (A significantly revised version has been published as Information Flow: the Logical of Distributed Systems,Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1997.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkeley, G. (1710). A Treatise Concerning Principles of Human Knowedge. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin, J. (1973). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Translated by William J. Berg. Madison, WI: The University of Wiscons in Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Dretske, F. I. (1981). Knowlege and the Flow of Information. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funt, B. V. (1980). Problem-Solving with Diagrammatic Representations. In Glasgow, J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, N. H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cogitive and Computational Perspectives, 33–68. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelernter, H. (1959). Realization of a Geometry-Theorem Proving Machine. In Feigenbaum, E. A. and Feldman, J. (eds.) Computers and Thought, 134–152. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of Art: an Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: the Bobbs-Merrill Company, INC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, E. (1995). Logic and Visual Information. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1739). A Treatise of Human Nature. The Philosophical Works of David Hume. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, J. H. and Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a Diagram Is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. In Glasgow, J., Narayana, N. H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 69–109. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, H. J. (1988). Logic and the Complexity of Reasoning. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17: 355–389.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, H. J. and Brachman, R. J. (1985). A Fundamental Tradeoff in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (Revised Version). In Brachman, R. J. and Levesque, N. J. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation, 42–70. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsay, R. K. (1988). Images and Inference. In Glasgow, J. I., Narayanan, N. H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Digrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 111–135. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental Aspects of Cognitive Representation. In Rosch, E. and Llyod, B. B. (eds.) Cognition and Categorization, 259–303. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973). What the Mind’s Eye Tells the Mind’s Brain: A Critique of Mental Imaginery. Psychological Bulletin 80: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1923). Vagueness. In Slater, J. G. (ed.) Essays on Language, Mind and Matter: The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Volume 9, 145–154. London: Unwin Hyman, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimojima, A. (1996a). On the Efficacy of Representation. Ph.D. Thesis. The Department of Philosophy, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimojima, A. (1996b). Operational Constraints in Diagrammatic Reasoning. In Barwise, J. and Allwein, G. (eds.) Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, 27–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimojima, A. (1996c). Reasoning with Diagrams and Geometrical Constraints. In Westershâhl, D. and Seligman, J. (eds.) Language, Logic and Computation, Volume 1, 527–540. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1971). Interactions between Philosophy and AI: the Role of Intuition and Non-Logical Reasoning in Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 2: 209–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1975). Afterthoughts on Analogical Representations. In Brachman, R. J. and Levesque, H. J. (eds.) Readings in Knowledge Representation, 432–439. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, A. (1995). Musings on the Roles of Logical and Nonlogical Representations in Intelligence. In Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N. H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 7–32. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, K. and Inder, R. (1995). Applying Semantic Concepts to Analyzing Media and Modalities. In Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N. H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds.) Diagrammatic Reasoning: Cognitive and Computational Perspectives, 303–338. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J. (1995). A Cognitive Theory of Graphical and Linguistic Reasoning: Logic and Implementation. Cognitive Science 19: 97–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1921). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Second Edition. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shimojima, A. (2001). The Graphic-Linguistic Distinction. In: Blackwell, A.F. (eds) Thinking with Diagrams. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3524-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3524-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5695-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-3524-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics