Skip to main content

Debra P. v. Turlington

Judicial Standards for Assessing the Validity of Minimum Competency Tests

  • Chapter
The Courts, Validity, and Minimum Competency Testing

Part of the book series: Evaluation in Education and Human Services ((EEHS))

Abstract

The educational equity issues presented by the use of minimum competency tests (MCTs) to deny high school diplomas are addressed in Debra P. v. Turlington 1 a lawsuit addressing the state of Florida’s use of a functional literacy examination to determine the award of regular high school diplomas. The litigation provided the first judicial forum for addressing issues concerning the fairness of MCT programs used to make critical determinations about students. In addition, the court decisions entered in the case present new challenges to education and testing professionals concerned about the validity of criterion-reflected tests used to certify a student’s successful completion of a program of elementary and secondary education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. Supp. 244 (M.D. Fla. 1979), ajfd, in part, revd, in part, 644 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1981), petition for rehg, and petition for rehg, en banc denied, 644 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. Sept. 4, 1981 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Supp. at 259.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Plaintiffs alleged that the failure to require the test for potential private high school graduates violated the constitutional guarantees in two ways. First, they charged that the exemption had the effect of sorting students on the basis of race because most of the private schools had all white or predominantly white enrollments. Plaintiffs asserted that these enrollments were the result of black students’ financial inability to attend private schools as well as the attempts of white parents to use private schools to shield their children from the desegregation of the public schools. The trial court found that the private school exemption was constitutional. The issue was not raised during the appeal of the case.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Supp. at 256.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F.2d at 408.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. 483 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  7. McNeal v. Tate, 508 F.2d 1017 (5th Cir. 1970 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. F. Supp. at 252.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Supp. at 256–257.

    Google Scholar 

  10. U.S.C. §2000d.

    Google Scholar 

  11. U.S.C. §1703.

    Google Scholar 

  12. U.S.C. §2000e.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Supp. 926 (N.D. Cal. 1979 ).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Civil Service Commission, Department of Labor, and Department of Justice), 33 Fed. Reg. 12,333 (1978) (formally codified at 29 C.F.R. pt. 1607 (1979)).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Presumably, the high failure rate on these items meant the material was not taught in school either — a unique problem of curricular match (or lack thereof) for black students taking the FLT.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Supp. at 261–262.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Madaus, G.F. and Pedulla, J.J. “An Examination of Item Bias in the Florida Functional Literacy Test’’ A paper prepared for the Center for Law and Education, Cambridge, Mass., June 1980. The work on the paper was supported by the Ford Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Testimony of Professor Robert Linn, National Institute of Education Issues Clarification Hearing on Minimum Competency Testing, Washington, D.C., July 9, 1981. The data are also available in unpublished form from Professor Linn at the University of Illinois, Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  19. F.2d at 406.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Id. at 408.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a discussion of the legal issues concerning MCT that provides more detail than space allows here, see McClung, Competency Testing Programs: Legal and Educational Issues, 47 Fordham L. Rev. 651,11979).

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Supp. at 266, 644 F.2d at 404.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Supp. at 267.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Supp. at 266, 644 F.2d at 404.

    Google Scholar 

  26. F.2d at 405.

    Google Scholar 

  27. F. Supp. at 259.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Id.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Id. at 264.

    Google Scholar 

  30. F.Supp. at 264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pullin, D. (1983). Debra P. v. Turlington. In: Madaus, G.F. (eds) The Courts, Validity, and Minimum Competency Testing. Evaluation in Education and Human Services. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5364-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-5364-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-5366-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-5364-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics