Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Sequel of the Revolt

  • Chapter
The Peasants’ Revolt of Banten in 1888

  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

Having dealt in detail with all the stirring events of July 1888 in North Banten, it only remains for us to examine the mark they left on the fabric of Banten society and on the nature of Dutch rule during the years that followed. Once the embers of the rebellion had been extinguished, the Dutch government found itself faced with the problem of making administrative re-arrangements, not only with regard to the simple day-to-day operations of the administrative machinery, but also for the purpose of a long-range, profound transformation. In fact, the events of July 1888 forced the Dutch to re-examine their colonial policy. The new colonial policy that emerged, considerably altered by the ordeal of the rebellion, was undoubtedly correlative with the view of the rebellion that prevailed in government circles. In this section the influence of the revolt on bureaucratic reform, taxation policy, religious education, the position of the religious leaders and military precautions will be assessed in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Java Bode, July 11, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bataviaasch Handelsblad, July 14, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Soerabaiasch Handehblad, July 18, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bataviaasch Handehblad, July 14, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  5. For the first opinion, see De Locomotief, July 18, 1888; for the second opinion, see Java Bode, July 16, 1888, which refers to a contention that the revolt might have something to do with the ‘zendingscirculaire’ (circular letter concerning the Christian mission) of the Minister of Colonies.

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Locomotief, July 13 and 26, 1888; see also Nederburgh (1888), pp. 14–29; van Sandick (1891), pp. 153–158.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bataviaasch Handehblad, July 21, 1888; De Locomotief, July 28, 1888; WNI (1888–1889), pp. 9–11, 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. WNI (1888–1889), p. 990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Java Bode, Aug. 21, 22 and 23, 1888. This newspaper had a semi-official character; it had a “monopoly” of officials news, and it fully supported government policy. For Koch’s assessment of the character of this newspaper in the 1880s, see Koch (1956), p. 40; for the history of its development, see von Faber (n.d.), pp. 58–63. De Locomotief took an outspoken “colonialliberal” standpoint, and was the voice of what was later known as the “Ethical Policy” group; see Mühlenfeld, in KT, Vol. IV (1916), pp. 37–39; also von Faber (n.d.), pp. 65–68. De Locomotief can be regarded as the vehicle of the “colonial opposition”. Bataviaasch Handelsblad was based on a moderate and humanitarian view; TNI (1858), no. 1, pp. 276–292; see also von Faber (n.d.), pp. 50–51. Soerabaiasch Handelsblad, under the editorship of Uilkens, during a large part of the ‘eighties criticized Surabaja’s mercantile community and government officials, while it later supported the view that the interest of Surabaja and the hinterland should be defended; see von Faber (n.d.), pp. 75–82; also Koch (1956), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Java Bode, Aug. 22, 1888; for the said measures, see Chap. II, pp. 62–66; they were also dealt with extensively in the report of the Director of the Department of Interior, see Report DDI, pp. 161–198; 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Java Bode, Aug. 23, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Locomotief, Aug. 25, 1888; Nieuws van den Dag, Feb. 5, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nieuws van den Dag, Nov. 5, 1888; Feb. 5, 1889; see also WNI (1888–1889), p. 1311. Groneman pointed out that the Banten revolt could have been a prologue to a general rising, if the government had not eliminated various abuses.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nieuws van den Dag, Sept. 7, Oct. 6, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Standaard, Sept. 26, 1888; see also Koch (1960), pp. 70–80. This newspaper voiced the principles of the Anti-Revolutionare Partij (Anti-Revolutionary Party, one of the major parties of Protestants) ; De Tijd was a Roman Catholic newspaper; Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant was liberal. See Schneider (1943). The Nieuws van den Dag was more an informative paper than an opinion paper; see Schneider (1951), p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. De Standaard, Sept. 26, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See above, under note 15.

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Tijd, Aug. 29, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nieuwe Rotterdamsche Courant, June 19, 1889, also cited in IG (1889), no. 2, p. 1427.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Standaard and De Tijd were in line with the colonial policy of the religious parties in the Netherlands, which at the end of the century stressed evangelization, while the more “liberally”-tinged Nieuwe Rotter-damsche Courant opposed such a policy.

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Locomotief, July 26; Aug. 9, 11, 17 and 20, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Locomotief, Oct. 1, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  24. De Locomotief, July 26 and 30, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Locomotief, July 24, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  26. De Locomotief, Aug. 16, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  27. De Locomotief, Aug. 20, 1888; the introduction of vaccination gave rise to disturbances in 1820, see above, Chap. IV, p. 9; at about the same time the religious leaders’ aid was called in to introduce vaccination in Prijangan, see Olivier, Vol. I (1827), pp. 301–302. Cf. Roorda van Eysinga (1856), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Locomotief, July 26, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Appendix VIII.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Report DDI, Appendix I, especially as regards the complaints against Raden Penna.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  32. O.I.B. July 15, 1888, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Report of the Director of the Department of Interior, Sept. 18, 1888, no. 5162, in Vb. Feb. 7, 1889, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  34. See above, Chap. I, pp. 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Groneman (1891), pp. 102–103. Its publication was anxiously expected, especially by the press, see WNI (1888–1889), p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  36. The Director of the Department of Interior to the Gov. Gen., July 19, 1888, La B, in MR 1888, no. 506.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Report DDI, pp. 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Report DDI, p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Report DDI, pp. 228–233; cf. van den Berg, in TBG, Vol. XXVIII (1883), pp. 158–175; Holle, in TBG, Vol. XXXI (1886), pp. 67–81.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Report DDI, p. 221.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Report DDI, pp. 150–159,

    Google Scholar 

  43. Report DDI, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Report DDI, 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Report DDI, p. 214.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Java Bode, Aug. 22, 1888; Report DDI, p. 214, 216, 226.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Java Bode, Aug. 22, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  48. See above, Chap. II, pp. 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Report DDI, p. 240.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Report DDI, p. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Report DDI, p. 246.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Report DDI, p. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Report DDI, pp. 249–257; see Staatsblad 1867, no. 114.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Report DDI, p. 259; see note signed by the Regent of Pandeglang, Sept. 14, 1888, in Report DDI, Appendix U.

    Google Scholar 

  55. In the post-rebellion period, native civil servants tended to avoid any semblance of religious zeal, see Snouck Hurgronje’s note on Banten, Aug. 15, 1892; see also below, p. 312.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Report DDI, p. 258; van den Berg, in TBG, Vol. XXXI (1882), p. 553.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Report DDI, p. 258; see above, Chap. V, pp. 148 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Report DDI, pp. 250–254.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Letter from the Minister of Colonies to the Gov. Gen., Sept. 27, 1889, no. 12, in Vb. Sept. 27, 1889, no. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Report DDI, pp. 260–263.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Advice of the Vice-President of the Council of the Indies, Oct. 5, 1888, in MR 1888, no. 1652.

    Google Scholar 

  62. IG (1891), no. 2, p. 1206; Advice of t(he Council of the Indie)s, Oct. 5, 1888, Kommissoriaal No. 16547, in MR 1888, no. 1652.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Van Sandick traced the popular discontent to several hardships of the previous decade: the cattle plague (1879), the fever epidemic (1880), famine (1881–1882), the Mt. Krakatau eruption (1883) ; and also to excessive assessment of taxes, see above, Chap. II, pp. 62–66.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Nederburgh (1888) in his “Tjilegon-Bantam-Java”.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Java Bode, Aug. 22, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Report DDI, pp. 233–234; see also WNI (1888–1889), pp. 113–114.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Report DDI, Appendix I; see above, Chap. III, under note 61.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Report DDI, pp. 236–240; see also Java Bode, Aug. 23, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  71. WNI (1888–1889), pp. 165, 1521.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ibidem; by the court of justice is meant the co-called “Rechtbank van Omgang” (Ambulatory Court). Raden Penna’s successor was M. Ng. Wir-jadidjaja, see O.I.B. Jan. 21, 1889, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  73. WNI (1888–1889), p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Java Bode, Aug. 23, 1888; see Advice of the Council of the Indies, Oct. 5, 1888, Kommissoriaal, No. 16547.

    Google Scholar 

  75. WNI (1888–1889), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  76. WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1257–1257; see also Weekblad voor Indië, Vol. III (1906–1907), pp. 894–895.

    Google Scholar 

  77. WNI (1888–1889), pp. 794f., 895 f,. p. 946, pp. 989 f., pp. 1191 f., pp. 1470 f., pp. 1520 ff., pp. 1642 f., pp. 1699 f., pp. 1815 if., pp.1887 f., pp. 2181 f., p. 2251, pp. 2438 f, pp. 2602 f.; also WNI (1889–1890), pp. 72 f., pp. 194 f., pp. 459 ff., pp. 564 ff., pp. 681 f., p. 1032, p. 1085, pp. 1441 f.

    Google Scholar 

  78. A. Djajadiningrat (1936), pp. 233–234; WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1815 f. See also Snouck Hurgronje’s note of Aug. 15, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  79. A. Djajadiningrat (1936), p. 234.

    Google Scholar 

  80. A. Djajadiningrat (1936), p. 235.

    Google Scholar 

  81. WNI (1888–1889), p. 1815.

    Google Scholar 

  82. IG (1891), no. 2, pp. 1142–1144.

    Google Scholar 

  83. This means: the government is very judicious; see WNI (1889–1890), p. 565.

    Google Scholar 

  84. O.I.B. Apr. 14, 1884, no. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Missive of the Resident of Banten, July 7, 1889, no. 249, in MR 1889, no. 597. See also O.I.B. Aug. 28, 1889, no. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Missive of the Resident of Banten, July 7, 1889, no. 249; see above, Chap. III, p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  87. E.g. in the past: Tjondronegoro, Gondokusumo ; see above Chap. III, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Missive of the Resident of Banten, July 7, 1889, no. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  89. A. Djajadiningrat (1936), p. 94. The resident seems to have intended him to become the future Patih of Anjer; WNI (1888–1889), p. 2602.

    Google Scholar 

  90. For the genealogy of the Djajadiningrats, see Appendix III.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Surawinangun was a son of R.T. Suta Angunangun, see above Chap. III, p. 86; see WNI (1888–1889), p. 2438, esp. as regards his inauguration.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Missive of the Resident of Banten, July 7, 1889, no. 249.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Note of the Director of the Department of Interior, July 20, 1889, no. 3895, in MR 1889, no. 597.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Kommissoriaal, July 22, 1889, no. 703, in MR 1889, no. 597.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Note of the Director of the Department of Interior, July 20, 1889, no. 3895.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Aug. 11, 1889, no. 279, in MR 1889, no. 597.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Missive of the Resident of Banten, July 7, 1889, no. 279; Kommissoriaal, July 22, 1889, no. 703, in MR 1889, no. 597; also Missive of the Resident of Banten, Aug. 11, 1889, no. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Aug. 11, 1889, no. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  99. O.I.B. Aug. 28, 1889, no. 14; for the inauguration, see WNI (1888–1889), p. 2438. For his activities during his administration, see his autobiography, MS in the collection of the Bataviaasch Genootschap, MS Holle, no. 266.

    Google Scholar 

  100. O.I.B. Oct. 16, 1889, no. 27; see also Regeeringsalmanak, 1890, 1891; Javaansche Almanak, 1889, 1890, 1891.

    Google Scholar 

  101. Java Bode, Aug. 21, 1888; Nieuws van den Dag, Sept. 17, Oct. 6, 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Java Bode, Sept. 8 and 15, 1888; also IG (1889), no. 2, pp. 1783–1785; see also Chap. VIII, pp. 269 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Nieuws van den Dag, Sept. 17 and Oct. 6, 1888; WNI (1888–1889), p. 946. De Locomotief, Aug. 11, 1888, referred to a “rebellion-mythus” circulating in various places; see Snouck Hurgronje, in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. II (1959), p. 1157.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Missive of the Resident of Banten, June 15, 1889, no. 207, in Vb. Feb. 6, 1890, no. 14. The pradjurits may be regarded a native armed force, with a function inbetween that of a regular army and the police; they resembled the old corps of djajengsekars. Their field of operation was limited to their own region, see Vb. Jan. 23, 1890, no. 22, esp. the notes of Bureau A3 of the Ministry of Colonies.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Feb. 27, 1889, no. 58, in MR 1889, no. 154 or in Vb. Jan. 28, 1890, no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  106. O.I.B. Oct, 31, 1889, no. 5; see also WNI (1889–1890), pp. 194–195.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Appendix IX.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Report DDI, pp. 161–198; 240–246; see above Chap. II, pp. 62–64.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Feb. 27, 1889, no. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Note of the Director of the Department of Interior, Apr. 8, 1889, no. 1957, in MR 1889, no. 377 or Report of the Director of Finance, Apr. 5, 1890, no. 4988, in Vb. Jan. 28, 1890, no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Letter of the First Government Secretary, May 27, 1889, no. 163, in MR 1889, no. 377 or in Vb. Jan. 28, 1890, no. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Note of the Director of the Department of Interior, Apr. 8, 1889, no. 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Benda and McVey (1960), pp. 52–53; Adviser for Native Affairs to the Gov. Gen., Aug. 24, 1921, no. 560, in Collection of the Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, MS, no. H 797.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Jan. 7, 1889, no. 92, in Vb. Jan 23, 1890, no. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Note of the Director of the Department of Interior, March 15, 1889, no. 1414, in Vb. Jan. 23, 1890, no. 22. Mention was made of H. J. W. van Lawick van Pabst, whom he recommended as the right man to conduct the investigation.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Note from the Chief Inspector of the Cultures to the Director of the Department of Interior, Apr. 8, 1889, no. 1958, in Vb. Jan. 23, 1890, no. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Advice of the Council of the Indies, May 31, 1889, Kommissoriaal, No. 8522, in Vb. Jan. 23, 1890, no. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Feb. 27, 1889, no. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  121. The Gov. Gen. to the Minister of Colonies, July 17, 1890, no. 11, in Exh. Aug. 28, 1890, no. 29. See further about the 1878 regulation concerning the trade tax and Brooshooft’s criticism, Brooshooft (n.d.), pp. 175–178.

    Google Scholar 

  122. The Gov. Gen. to the Minister of Colonies, July 17, 1890, no. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Staatsblad, 1892, no. 275.

    Google Scholar 

  124. See the testimony of the Assistant Wedana of Balagendung, in Appendix VIII. See further the note of the Chief of the Public Health Service, Jan. 16, 1889, no. 34, in MR 1890, no. 468 or in Exh. Apr. 21, 1890, no. 97. For an instance of difficulties in performing the vaccination after the rebellion, see A. Djajadiningrat (1936), pp. 150–154. For the way in which difficulties in introducing vaccination in Prijangan had been overcome, see Olivier, Vol. I (1827), p. 301–302; also Roorda van Eysinga (1856), p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Note of the Chief of the Public Health Service, Jan. 16, 1889, no. 34; see also the report of the physician of the residency of Banten, May 17, 1889, no. 56, in Exh. Apr. 21, 1890, no. 97.

    Google Scholar 

  126. For the various abuses and evils, see Advice of Snouck Hurgronje, June 20, 1889, no. 11, in Vb. Oct. 18, 1889, no. 54. See also his advices in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. I (1959), pp. 1306–1465.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Bekasi (1869), Madiun (1869), Pekalongan (1872), Prijangan (1872); see de Waal, Vol. I (1876), pp. 236–237.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Note of Holle, Aug. 20, 1873, no. 126, in Vb. June 3, 1874, no. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Advice of the Council of the Indies, Oct. 31, 1873, in Vb. June 3, 1874, no. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Nieuws van den Dag, Oct. 6, 1888; WNI (1888–1889), p. 946.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Dec. 22, 1888, no. 175, in MR 1888, no. 863 or in Vb. Feb. 7, 1889, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Ibidem; see also Report DDI, Appendix U. One of the chief measures taken by the government to control religious education was to keep records on the religious teachers, the so-called guru-register. In Banten this register was better kept than in other regions; see KT, Vol. VI (1917), p. 736.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Report DDI, Appendix U.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Missive of the Resident of Banten, Dec. 22, 1888, no. 175.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Note of Holle, Sept. 20, 1890, no. 104, in Vb. Dec. 2, 1890, C15.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Ibidem; in the 1870s there was a tendency for Arabian dress to become popular; it was also worn by people who had not made the hadj yet.

    Google Scholar 

  140. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  142. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Ibidem; see also Note of Holle, Nov. 27, 1888, no. 50, in Vb. Feb. 8, 1889, no. 31; also Snouck Hurgronje, in VG, Vol. IV, part 1 (1924), pp. 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Reports on Banten in the post-rebellion period made still more frequent mention of the kjais in Banten, who were very powerful and enjoyed prestige among the population. See Adviser for Native Affairs to the Gov. Gen., Aug. 24, 1921, no. 560. See also Benda and McVey (1960), pp. 2–22.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Note of Holle, Sept, 20, 1890, no. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Missive from the Gov. Gen. to the Minister of Colonies, Nov. 19, 1888, no. 1652, in Exh. Dec. 27, 1888, no. 117 or in Vb. Feb. 7, 1889, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Note of Snouck Hurgronje, June 7, 1889, no. 7, in Collection of the Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, MS, no. H 797 ; also in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. III (1965), pp. 1980–1986.

    Google Scholar 

  148. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Missive of the Resident of Banten, June 24, 1889, no. 217 in Exh. Aug. 20, 1889, no. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Advice of certain members of the Council of the Indies, June 21, 1889, in Exh. Aug. 20, 1889, no. 59. For the influence of the exiles on their environment, see Missive of the Assistant Resident of Gorontalo, Apr. 16, 1889, no. 48, and that of the Resident of Menado, June 2, 1889, La U, in MR 1889, no. 483.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Note of Snouck Hurgronje, June 7, 1889, no. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  152. Snouck Hurgronje, in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. II (1959), p. 1157.

    Google Scholar 

  153. a synoptic report of this tour is given by van Ronkel, in BKI, Vol. CI (1942), pp. 311–339.

    Google Scholar 

  154. Cited by Holle in his note of Sept. 20, 1890, no. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  155. Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  156. Snouck Hurgronje’s note of August 15, 1892, also in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. III (1965), pp. 1986–1999, esp. p. 1991. See also VG, Vol. IV, part 1 (1924), p. 254.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Snouck Hurgronje, in VG, Vol. IV, part 1 (1924), p. 255; also his note of August 15, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Snouck Hurgronje’s note of August 15, 1892; see also VG, Vol. IV, part 2 (1924), p. 421.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Snouck Hurgronje, in VG, Vol. IV, part 2 (1924), p. 422.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Note of Snouck Hurgronje, Aug. 15, 1892; see esp. in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. III (1965), pp. 1989–1990.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Ibidem. Dusun literally means village.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Ibidem; see also Opleidingsschool voor Inlandsche Ambtenaren te Serang, n.p. (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  163. Note of Snouck Hurgronje, August 15, 1892.

    Google Scholar 

  164. Unfortunately, several non-Bantenese officials had been promoted during their service in Banten, not because of their capacities or qualifications as civil servants, but because of their clientage to European officials; this gave rise to much resentment among the Bantenese against non-Bantenese officials; see Snouck Hurgronje’s note of Aug. 15, 1892; also in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. III (1965), p. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  165. The Adviser on Native Affairs to the Gov. Gen., August 24, 1921, no. 560.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Ibidem; see also: the Adviser on Native Affairs to the Gov. Gen., Oct. 20, 1921, no. 11336, in Collection of the Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Landen Volkenkunde, MS, no. H 797.

    Google Scholar 

  167. Note of Snouck Hurgronje, August 15, 1892; also in Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. III (1965), p. 1990. The term “zakelijke motieven” may denote the same as the Weberian term “legal-rational norms”.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Note of Snouck Hurgronje, August 15, 1892; see also Gobée and Adriaanse, Vol. III (1965), p. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  169. WNI (1888–1889), pp. 1520–1522.

    Google Scholar 

  170. WNI (1889–1890), p. 681; the monument was inaugurated on Dec. 22, 1889.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wonogiri (Surakarta), Indonesien

    Sartono Kartodirdjo

Authors
  1. Sartono Kartodirdjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr W. F. Wertheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1966 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kartodirdjo, S., Wertheim, W.F. (1966). The Sequel of the Revolt. In: The Peasants’ Revolt of Banten in 1888. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, vol 50. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6357-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6357-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-017-6351-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6357-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation