Abstract
Regulatory requirements to protect habitat have increased, requiring forest managers to include measures of biodiversity, habitat, and streamside protection in their plans. A demonstration of environmental and economic effects for a range of timber management alternatives was developed for western Washington. Economic and environmental effects were characterized for current and prospective regulations as well as for several management alternatives designed to achieve environmental objectives similar to those produced by the regulations. Tradeoffs between environmental and economic effects were developed for the landowners’ decision process. As a basis for policy analysis, tradeoffs between the benefits and costs to rural and urban communities were identified, demonstrating who gains and who loses under various management alternatives. Integration of timber growth and yield models with habitat models in a mathematical programming framework was used to produce the biological and economic measures associated with different management strategies. Experimental choice analysis among management alternatives was then used to develop public preference values for measures of forest biodiversity, aesthetics, rural job losses, and costs as surrogates for the economic-environmental tradeoffs. Results showed that regulations and proposals that focus on preservation without considering longterm motivation to produce non-market forest amenities result in significantly less value to the public and less equitable treatment across urban and timber rural communities than do alternatives that seek to jointly produce timber and non-market amenities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, D., Alig, R., Anderson, D., and Stevens, J. 1992. Future prospects for western Washington’s timber supply. Institute of Forest Resources Contribution #74. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington. Seattle, WA USA. 200 p.
Bare, B.B., Lippke, B.R., Xu, W., and Oliver, C.D. 1997. Demonstration of trust impacts from management alternatives to achieve habitat conservation goals on Washington Department of Natural Resources Managed Lands. (Available as CINTRAFOR RE-42.) College of Forest Resources, University of Washington. Seattle, WA USA. 236 p.
Curtis, R.O., Clendenen, G.W., and DeMars, D.J. 1981. A new stand simulator for coast Douglas-fir: DFSIM users’s guide. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-128. Portland, OR: USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 157 p.
Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team. 1993. Forest ecosystem management: An ecological, economic, and social assessment. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Department of the Intern [and others]. [irregular pagination].
Lippke, B.R., Sessions, J., and Andrew B.C. 1996. Economic analysis of forest landscape management alternatives: A final report of the Working Group on the Economic Analysis of Forest Landscape Management Alternatives for the Washington Forest Landscape Management Project. Sponsored by USDA Forest Service, PNW Research Station, and Washington State Department of Natural Resources. (Available as CINTRAFOR SP-21, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA. ) 157 p.
U.S. Laws, Statutes, etc. Public Law 93–205. The Endangered Species Act of 1973. As of December 28, 1973. 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531–1536, 1538–1540.
Washington Department of Natural Resources. 1993. Draft Habitat Conservation Plan (for certain lands managed by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources). DNR. Olympia, WA.
Washington Forest Practices Board. 1996. Forest Practice Board Rules-WAC 222. Department of Natural Resources, Forest Practices Division. Olympia, WA.
Xu, W. 1997. Experimental choice analysis of non-market values for ecosystem management with preference heterogeneity. Dissertation. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington. Seattle, WA USA. 155 p.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lippke, B., Bare, B.B., Xu, W., Moffett, J., Turner, B. (1999). The Joint Production of Timber and Environmental Values. In: Yoshimoto, A., Yukutake, K. (eds) Global Concerns for Forest Resource Utilization. Forestry Sciences, vol 62. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6397-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6397-4_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5320-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-6397-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive