Abstract
In his book, The Meaning of the Body: The Aesthetics of Human Understanding, Mark Johnson (The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007) built his case for the importance of aesthetics in a conception of cognition as inherently embodied upon the writings in psychology and philosophy of William James and John Dewey. He devoted significant portions of the early sections of the book to each of these authors, who, with phenomenologist Merleau-Ponty, he has considered critical to the developments in neuroscience that have debunked the Cartesian mind/body dualism. Writing elsewhere, Johnson (Daedalus 135(3):46–54, 2006) asserted, “I regard American pragmatist philosophy, which came to prominence early in the twentieth century, as the most scientifically and philosophically sophisticated naturalistic, non-dualistic approach to mind available to us even today” (p. 48). In this chapter I will focus on Dewey’s influence on Johnson’s theory of embodied mind as a theoretical framework for a qualitative research study on aesthetic reflection as embodied interpretation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
My use of the term differs from that of Immanuel Kant in his Critique of Judgment, in that I am concerned with the reflection that occurs in the process of interpretive visual response, while Kant was referring solely to the contemplation of aesthetic objects.
- 2.
Pseudonyms are used to ensure confidentiality.
References
Barrett, T. 2002. Interpreting art: Reflecting, wondering, and responding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bell, P. 2001. Content analysis of visual images. In Handbook of visual analysis, ed. T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt, 10–34. London: Sage.
Biesta, G., and N. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and educational research. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Cochran-Smith, M., and S. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Costantino, T. 2007. Articulating aesthetic understanding through art making. International Journal of Education & the Arts 8(1). http://ijea.asu.edu/v8n1/.
Costantino, T. 2010. The critical relevance of aesthetic experience for 21st century art education: The role of wonder. In Essays on aesthetic education for the 21st century, ed. T. Costantino and B. White, 63–77. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dewey, J. 1934. Art as experience. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Dewey, J. 1984. Qualitative thought. In John Dewey: The later works, ed. J. Boydston, vol. 5, 243–262. (Original work published 1930). Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. 1960/2000. Truth and method. New York: Continuum.
Immordino-Yang, H., and A. Damasio. 2007. We feel therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education 1(1): 3–10.
Johnson, M. 2006. Mind incarnate: From Dewey to Damasio. Daedalus 135(3): 46–54.
Johnson, M. 2007. The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. C. Smith 1962. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Costantino, T.E. (2015). A Qualitative Study of Aesthetic Reflection as Embodied Interpretation. In: Scarinzi, A. (eds) Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind: Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 73. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9379-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-9378-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-9379-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)