Skip to main content

Liberalisation and Regulation of International Trade in Telecommunications Services Through the WTO

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Universal Service in WTO and EU law

Part of the book series: Legal Issues of Services of General Interest ((LEGAL))

  • 595 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is the first step of the intended comparative analysis of the approaches to regulation of markets in social interest that exist at the international level. This chapter studies the origins and the process of liberalisation of trade in telecommunications services at the international level within the framework of the WTO. It identifies the reasons for the adoption of regulatory provisions and focuses in particular on the socio-political issue of universal service. In this regard, it analyses specific features of the current regulatory framework for universal service at the WTO level in the light of the recent jurisprudence of the Dispute Settlement Body. Additionally, the chapter investigates the relationship between the rules of different international organisations (WTO and ITU) relevant for universal service in telecommunications. It also undertakes three country studies in order to better understand the interplay between the WTO regulation and national regulation of universal service provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pipe 1990, p. 109.

  2. 2.

    Tegge 1994, pp. 159–160.

  3. 3.

    Davies 1994, pp. 107–108.

  4. 4.

    Undertakings in many industry sectors availed themselves of this opportunity. They further developed their own networks with the progress of liberalisation in the telecommunications sector. Examples are big private (internal) networks belonging to the banks Bank of America, Citibank/Citicorp, Barclays Bank and Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP); undertakings in the textile industry such as Levy Strauss and Marks & Spencer; the car manufacturers General Motors and Ford of Europe—following the example of their Japanese rivals; and Boeing, McDonnell Douglas and other airlines and aircraft manufacturers. For more information see Davies 1994, pp. 117–144; Mansell 1994.

  5. 5.

    Grewlich 1997, pp. 67–69.

  6. 6.

    Mansell 1994, p. 217.

  7. 7.

    Langenfurth 2000, p. 130.

  8. 8.

    This statement and the rest of this section is based on the study by Drake 1993.

  9. 9.

    Drake and Nicolaïdis 1992, pp. 47–49.

  10. 10.

    Idem, p. 56.

  11. 11.

    Aronson and Cowhey 1988, pp. 19–27.

  12. 12.

    Idem, p. 37.

  13. 13.

    Sandholtz 1998, pp. 143–144.

  14. 14.

    Aronson and Cowhey 1988, pp. 36–37; Woodrow 1991, p. 326. In footnote 4 on page 53 Aronson and Cowhey 1988 name the main lobby groups: International Telecommunications User Group (INTUG), Association of Data Processing Services Organisation (ADAPSO) (in 1991 renamed in Information Technology Association of America (ITAA)), Business Roundtable and International Chamber of Commerce (ICC).

  15. 15.

    Aronson and Cowhey 1988, p. 34.

  16. 16.

    Idem, pp. 32, 34.

  17. 17.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 117.

  18. 18.

    Mathew 2003, p. 46.

  19. 19.

    Bronckers and Larouche 2008, p. 320.

  20. 20.

    Idem, p. 320.

  21. 21.

    Tegge 1994, pp. 63–70.

  22. 22.

    Frühbrodt 2002, pp. 114–130, 137.

  23. 23.

    Although in most countries the PTTs were the monopolistic providers, there were a few examples of the separation of administrative and operating functions. Thus, in Italy and Spain there were telecommunications administration and a cartel of 5 and 3 telecommunications providers respectively. See Noam 1992, pp. 239–257.

  24. 24.

    Woodrow 1991, p. 329; Pipe 1990, p. 109.

  25. 25.

    Idem, p. 329.

  26. 26.

    Idem, p. 330.

  27. 27.

    Idem, p. 333.

  28. 28.

    Drake and Nicolaïdis 1992, p. 83.

  29. 29.

    Behrens and Werle 2003, p. 15.

  30. 30.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 329.

  31. 31.

    The Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the USA (CUSFTA) was signed in 1988 and entered into force on 1 January 1989. Its negotiations were launched in 1986.

  32. 32.

    The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between Canada, Mexico and the USA entered into force on 1 January 1994 and was based on CUSFTA.

  33. 33.

    Mosco 1993, pp. 193–194.

  34. 34.

    Aronson and Cowhey 1988, p. 40.

  35. 35.

    Idem, p. 40.

  36. 36.

    Communication from the Commission to the Council. Telecommunications: Lines of Action, COM(83) 573 final of 29 September 1983, p. 10.

  37. 37.

    Communication by the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Towards a Dynamic European Economy—Green Paper on the Development of the Common Market for Telecommunications Services and Equipment. COM(87) 290 final of 30 June 1987, p. 150.

  38. 38.

    Idem, p. 151.

  39. 39.

    Frühbrodt 2002, pp. 314–316, 327–328.

  40. 40.

    Idem, pp. 316–319.

  41. 41.

    Drake and Nicolaïdis 1992, p. 91.

  42. 42.

    Holmes and Young 2002, p. 27.

  43. 43.

    Tuthill 1996, p. 91.

  44. 44.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 319.

  45. 45.

    McLarty 1999, pp. 16–17.

  46. 46.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 331.

  47. 47.

    WTO, Background Note of the WTO Negotiations on Basic Telecommunications, 22 February 1996. http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres96_e/ta3-tel.htm.

  48. 48.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 339.

  49. 49.

    Adopted on 15.04.1994. http://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/50-dstel_e.htm.

  50. 50.

    Petrazzini 1996, p. 13.

  51. 51.

    Holmes and Young 2002, p. 28. See also the European Community and its Member States, Draft Offer on Basic Telecommunications, S/NGBT/W/12/Add.10 of 16.10.1995.

  52. 52.

    Behrens and Werle 2003, p. 25.

  53. 53.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 342.

  54. 54.

    For more information see Frühbrodt 2002, p. 343.

  55. 55.

    In detail on the accounting rates system see Ó Siochrú 1997.

  56. 56.

    Frühbrodt 2002, pp. 343–344; Ó Siochrú 1997, pp. 52–53; Mathew 2003, pp. 62–63.

  57. 57.

    Petrazzini 1996, pp. 8 et seq.; Aronson 1997, pp. 15–16; Behrens and Werle 2003, pp. 24–25.

  58. 58.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 342.

  59. 59.

    Behrens and Werle 2003, p. 25.

  60. 60.

    See the detailed, specified overview by country in Frühbrodt 2002, pp. 353–371; Langenfurth 2000, pp. 219–238.

  61. 61.

    Petrazzini 1996, p. 8.

  62. 62.

    Currently, there are 78 participants. See the Annex to this paper with the table of countries’ schedules. The EU-28 is in both cases counted as one member.

  63. 63.

    Currently, there are 67 participants. See the Annex to this paper with the table of countries’ schedules. The EU-28 is in both cases counted as one member.

  64. 64.

    MTN.GNS/23, para 10.

  65. 65.

    Idem, para 65.

  66. 66.

    Idem, para 69.

  67. 67.

    Idem, para 71.

  68. 68.

    Idem, para 72.

  69. 69.

    Currently, the WTO seems to prevail over the ITU as regards the regulation of the provision of telecommunications. The decision of the Panel in the Mexico Telecoms case allows for the conclusion that the application or implementation of the ITU Recommendations by nation states shall be carried out in compliance with the principles of the Reference Paper. The ITU Recommendations are instrumentalised by the WTO to achieve its market liberalisation objectives. See WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004. For a critical assessment of the Panel’s decision see Neven and Mavroidis 2003, pp. 758–789.

  70. 70.

    Fourth Protocol to the General Agreement on Trade in Services, S/L/20 from 30 April 1996.

  71. 71.

    Note by the Chairman of NGBT for scheduling Basic Telecommunications Services, S/GBT/W/2/Rev.1 of 16 January 1997. http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres97_e/finalrep.htm.

  72. 72.

    Bronckers and Larouche 2008, p. 329.

  73. 73.

    The data are based on the author’s own research and analysis of the WTO Members’ schedules of commitments. See the Annex to this study with the table of countries’ schedules.

  74. 74.

    Brazil Trade Policy Review, WT/TPR/S/212/Rev.1, p. 117.

  75. 75.

    Note by the Chairman of NGBT for scheduling Basic Telecommunications Services, S/GBT/W/2/Rev.1 of 16 January 1997. http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres97_e/finalrep.htm.

  76. 76.

    Bronckers and Larouche 1997, p. 19.

  77. 77.

    Paragraph 1 Annex; Tuthill 1996, p. 91.

  78. 78.

    Tuthill 1996, p. 94.

  79. 79.

    Fredebeul-Krein and Freytag 1997, pp. 485–486; Tuthill 1997, p. 792.

  80. 80.

    See e.g. Tuthill 1996, p. 93; Gao 2008a, p. 703.

  81. 81.

    Compare in para 5(e) of the Annex: “no condition is imposed on access and use of public telecommunications transport networks and services other than necessary”; Tuthill 1996, p. 93.

  82. 82.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, para 4.181.

  83. 83.

    Idem, para 7.311.

  84. 84.

    One of the arguments is that the exemplary list of para 5(f) of the Annex does not refer to pricing measures and does not contain any conditions which were similar to pricing measures. See WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.324–7.327.

  85. 85.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, para 7.328.

  86. 86.

    Idem, paras 7.337–7.338.

  87. 87.

    Idem, paras 7.341–7.342.

  88. 88.

    Idem, para 7.335. Questions of the cost-orientation of prices as well as of the inclusion of universal service cost in the prices will be dealt in more detail in Sect. 3.2.3.

  89. 89.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 4.368–4.369.

  90. 90.

    Idem, para 7.388.

  91. 91.

    Idem, para 7.388.

  92. 92.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 336.

  93. 93.

    Idem, p. 336.

  94. 94.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.277–7.288.

  95. 95.

    Idem, paras 7.331–7.332.

  96. 96.

    Gao 2008a, p. 706.

  97. 97.

    Tuthill 1997, p. 786.

  98. 98.

    Cowhey and Aronson 2008, p. 406.

  99. 99.

    The competition principles of the Reference Paper are the first to be introduced in the WTO. For a detailed analysis see, for instance, Bronckers 2000; Tuthill 1997, pp. 792–794.

  100. 100.

    MTN.GNS/W/52 of 19 May 1989.

  101. 101.

    Idem, para 40.

  102. 102.

    Idem, para 40.

  103. 103.

    Idem, para 40.

  104. 104.

    MTN.GNS/23, para 9.

  105. 105.

    Idem, para 10.

  106. 106.

    Idem, para 65.

  107. 107.

    Idem, para 69.

  108. 108.

    Idem, para 71.

  109. 109.

    Idem, para 72.

  110. 110.

    Fredebeul-Krein and Freytag 1997, p. 482.

  111. 111.

    At this point it is very important to bear in mind that the incorporation of regulatory principles into an international framework for trade policy is per se a significant achievement. For decades, the telecommunications sector was regulated nationally with sovereignty as an overarching principle. See Drake and Noam 1997, p. 806.

  112. 112.

    Gao 2008b, p. 723.

  113. 113.

    Differentiation of telecommunications services into basic and value-added as well as the reasons for this, difficulties in the categorisation and current and future challenges have been dealt with in Sect. 2.1.2.4.

  114. 114.

    Note by the Secretariat “Services Sectoral classification list”, MTN.GNS/W/120 of 10.07.1991, p. 3. Eligibility of Voice over Internet Protocol service to become part of universal service is discussed in Commission Staff Working document, The treatment of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) under the EU Regulatory Framework: An information and consultation document, 14 June 2004, Brussels; Forbes 2005; ERG, Report on “VoIP and Consumer Issues” prepared by End User Working Group, ERG(06) 39, 2006; Xavier 2008. The feasibility of including email in the universal service scope and its implications are discussed in Anderson et al. 1995.

  115. 115.

    For instance, Bronckers 2000; Bronckers and Larouche 2008; Guermazi 2004.

  116. 116.

    Gao 2008b, p. 742; Krajewski 2008.

  117. 117.

    Guermazi 2004.

  118. 118.

    See Article III GATS on transparency and Articles II and XVII GATS on non-discrimination.

  119. 119.

    Gao 2008b, p. 742; Guermazi 2004, p. 12.

  120. 120.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.277–7.288.

  121. 121.

    Idem, paras 7.180.

  122. 122.

    Idem, paras 7.329–7.330.

  123. 123.

    Idem, paras 7.337 et seq.

  124. 124.

    Gao 2008b, p. 743.

  125. 125.

    Blouin 2000, p. 140.

  126. 126.

    Idem, pp. 139–140.

  127. 127.

    Idem, p. 141.

  128. 128.

    Idem, pp. 140–141.

  129. 129.

    Frühbrodt 2002, p. 350.

  130. 130.

    Fredebeul-Krein and Freytag 1999, p. 631.

  131. 131.

    Fredebeul-Krein and Freytag 1997, p. 482.

  132. 132.

    Fredebeul-Krein and Freytag 1999, p. 631.

  133. 133.

    See, for example, MTN.GNS/23, paras 43–44, 48, 49, 57; MTN.GNS/TEL/3, paras 83, 89.

  134. 134.

    Fredebeul-Krein and Freytag 1997, p. 490.

  135. 135.

    Mathew 2003, p. 177.

  136. 136.

    The relevant provisions of Article 1 RP “Competitive safeguards” are the following:

    1.1    Prevention of anti-competitive practices in telecommunications

    Appropriate measures shall be maintained for the purpose of preventing suppliers who, alone or together, are a major supplier from engaging in or continuing anti-competitive practices.

    1.2    Safeguards

    The anti-competitive practices referred to above shall include in particular:

        (a)    engaging in anti-competitive cross-subsidization; […].

  137. 137.

    Gao 2008b, pp. 732–733, 743.

  138. 138.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 3.1, 4.183–4.189.

  139. 139.

    Idem, para 4.177.

  140. 140.

    Idem, para 4.179.

  141. 141.

    Idem, para 4.180.

  142. 142.

    Idem, para 7.170.

  143. 143.

    Idem, paras 7.171, 7.173–7.174; for more details see Annex A and Annex F of ITU-T Recommendation D-140 (09/95) on Charging and Accounting in International Telecommunications Services: Accounting Rate Principles for International Telephone Service. http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/intset/itu-t/index.html.

  144. 144.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.168–7.177.

  145. 145.

    Idem, paras 7.179–7.184.

  146. 146.

    See Chung 2006; Neven and Mavroidis 2003; Sidak and Singer 2004; Wellenius et al. 2005.

  147. 147.

    Sidak and Singer 2004, p. 7.

  148. 148.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, para 2.3.

  149. 149.

    Sidak and Singer 2004, pp. 15–16.

  150. 150.

    Idem, p. 16.

  151. 151.

    Idem, p. 16.

  152. 152.

    Neven and Mavroidis 2003, p. 781.

  153. 153.

    Idem, p. 782.

  154. 154.

    Sidak and Singer 2004, pp. 16–17.

  155. 155.

    Further details on the ITU’s role in Batura 2014.

  156. 156.

    Ó Siochrú 1997; Tarjanne1999.

  157. 157.

    Kelsey 2008, p. 165.

  158. 158.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, para 4.198.

  159. 159.

    Idem, para 6.42.

  160. 160.

    See, for example, WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.134, 7.170–7.172.

  161. 161.

    Howse 2012, p. 465.

  162. 162.

    Molinuevo 2008, pp. 451, 455.

  163. 163.

    All the calculations and observations are made on the basis of the author’s study of WTO schedules of commitments. A summary of this study can be found in the Annex to this paper containing a table of countries’ schedules. The EU-28 is counted as one member.

  164. 164.

    Kelsey 2008, p. 163. For example, the respective obligation was undertaken by China in the Bilateral Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of the United States of America on China’s Accession to the WTO of 15 November 1995. See Zhang 2001, pp. 461–462.

  165. 165.

    Philippines Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/70/Suppl.2 of 11.04.1997.

  166. 166.

    Malaysia Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/52/Suppl.2 of 11.04.1997.

  167. 167.

    Tunisia Schedule of Specific Commitments, GATS/SC/87/Suppl.1 of 11.04.1997.

  168. 168.

    Zhao 2007, pp. 111–114.

  169. 169.

    See the list of seminars conducted by the ITU Telecommunications Development Sector: http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/treg/Events/Seminars/index.html and the web-based educational tool for regulators ICT Regulation Toolkit, produced by the ITU and the World Bank: http://www.ictregulationtoolkit.org/en/Index.html.

  170. 170.

    Zhao 2007, pp. 111–112.

  171. 171.

    Idem, pp. 114, 117.

  172. 172.

    By 2005 China had managed to successfully accomplish the Village Access project which aimed at achieving a 95 % telephone penetration rate in villages. This project concerned connecting telephone lines (fixed or mobile) to all 732,700 administrative villages. In May 2007 a new project was started with the intention of connecting all 5 million natural villages. At the moment, there is no objective of providing a telephone connection to every household. For more information see Shi 2008, pp. 117, 122–123. Statistics showing the digital divide in China can be found in Xia and Lu 2005, pp. 5–6; Zhang et al. 2007, p. 7.

  173. 173.

    Zhao 2007, pp. 117–118; Shi 2008, pp. 135–139.

  174. 174.

    Trade Policy Review of China, WT/TPR/S/230, 26 April 2010, p. 89.

  175. 175.

    This law, providing an overall legislative framework for telecommunications, has remained unchanged since its adoption. A draft Telecommunication Law of 2006 is pending in the State Council legislative Office. Trade Policy Review of China, WT/TPR/S/230, 26 April 2010, p. 89.

  176. 176.

    Shi 2008, pp. 125–126; Trade Policy Review of China, WT/TPR/S/230, 26 April 2010, p. 91.

  177. 177.

    Zhao 2007, pp. 115–116; Shi 2008, p. 126.

  178. 178.

    Zhao 2007, p. 116.

  179. 179.

    Xia and Lu 2008, pp. 687, 690.

  180. 180.

    These ten are Bangladesh, Cambodia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Gambia, Lesotho, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Senegal and Uganda. Author’s calculations on the basis of the data from the WTO schedules of commitments data bank. For more information see the Annex to this study with the table of countries’ schedules. For the UN list of least developed countries see the official webpage of the UN Department for Economic and Social Affairs: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/cdp/ldc2/ldc_countries.shtml. For the list of least developed countries—WTO Members see the official WTO webpage: http://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org7_e.htm.

  181. 181.

    Shirley et al. 2002, p. 3.

  182. 182.

    Teledensity in Uganda rose from 0.28 % in 1998 up to 22 % in 2008. Wakabi 2009, p. 19; Shirley et al. 2002, pp. 65–66.

  183. 183.

    Intelecon Report (2005) Universal Access and Universal Service Funds: insights and experiences of international best practices, pp. 2, 5. http://www.inteleconresearch.com/pdf/050713%20-%20universal%20access%20and%20universal%20service%20funds%20v3.pdf.

  184. 184.

    Tusubira 2006, p. 59.

  185. 185.

    Idem, p. 61.

  186. 186.

    Idem, p. 62; Intelecon Report (2005) Universal Access and Universal Service Funds: insights and experiences of international best practices, p. 5. http://www.inteleconresearch.com/pdf/050713%20-%20universal%20access%20and%20universal%20service%20funds%20v3.pdf.

  187. 187.

    Published in Statutory Instruments 2005 No. 26, Supplement No. 10 to The Uganda Gazette No. 14 Vol. XCVIII of 11 March 2005. http://www.ucc.co.ug/files/downloads/universalServiceRegulations.pdf.

  188. 188.

    Haman and Zongo 2005, p. 21.

  189. 189.

    Tusubira 2006, pp. 63–64.

  190. 190.

    See Wakabi 2009, particularly on pp. 19–27.

  191. 191.

    Wakabi 2009, pp. 17–18.

  192. 192.

    See the official web-page of FITEL, available at http://www.fitel.gob.pe/.

  193. 193.

    See, for example, Intelecon Report (2005) Universal Access and Universal Service Funds: insights and experiences of international best practices. http://www.inteleconresearch.com/pdf/050713%20-%20universal%20access%20and%20universal%20service%20funds%20v3.pdf; Pascó-Font and Torero 2001; Wallsten 2008.

  194. 194.

    Peru: Rethinking Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure, World Bank Report No. 32674-PE, 2006, p. 9.

  195. 195.

    Pascó-Font and Torero 2001, p. 15.

  196. 196.

    Intven and Tétrault 2000, p. 33.

  197. 197.

    Aprueban Texto Único Ordenado del Reglamento General de la Ley de Telecomunicaciones, Decreto Supremo No 020-2007-MTC. The text of the respective law can be retrieved from www.bvindecopi.gob.pe/regtec/ds20-2007-mtc.pdf.

  198. 198.

    Pascó-Font and Torero 2001, p. 17.

  199. 199.

    Information according to the ITU Universal Service country profile, Peru, 2010. http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/icteye/Reporting/ShowReportFrame.aspx?ReportName=/TREG/UniversalServiceProfile&ReportFormat=HTML4.0&RP_intCountryID=193&RP_intLanguageID=1.

  200. 200.

    Intven and Tétrault 2000, p. 33.

  201. 201.

    The OSIPTEL was established by Legislative Decree (Decreto Legislativo) No. 702 of 11 July 1991, Chap. 15. The document can be retrieved from: http://www.peru.gob.pe/docs/PLANES/7/PLAN_7_Legislaci%C3%B3n%20en%20Telecomunicaciones_2011.pdf. For more information on the principles of the work, objectives and functions of the OSIPTEL see its official webpage: http://www.osiptel.gob.pe.

  202. 202.

    For a description of the village selection process and criteria see Beuermann 2011, pp. 5–6.

  203. 203.

    Pascó-Font and Torero 2001, p. 19.

  204. 204.

    Intven and Tétrault 2000, p. 34.

  205. 205.

    For a more detailed description of beauty contests see Sect. 4.2.5.1.

  206. 206.

    Pascó-Font and Torero 2001, p. 19.

  207. 207.

    Idem, pp. 20–21.

  208. 208.

    Idem, pp. 20–21.

  209. 209.

    Stern and Townsend 2006, p. 11.

  210. 210.

    Pascó-Font and Torero 2001, p. 23.

  211. 211.

    For a detailed account see Peru: Rethinking Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure, World Bank Report No. 32674-PE, 2006, p. 10.

  212. 212.

    WTO, Trade Policy Review of Peru, WT/TPR/S/189/Rev.1 of 12 September 2007, p. 81.

  213. 213.

    Beuermann 2011.

  214. 214.

    On the interplay between liberalisation and regulation, also in a comparative perspective to the EU, see Batura and Krajewski 2013, esp. at pp. 174–175, 199–202.

  215. 215.

    The Panel’s (absence of) argumentation on Mexico’s application of the LRAIC methodology: WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.175–7.177.

  216. 216.

    WTO, Mexico—Measures Affecting Telecommunications Services—Report of the Panel, WTO Doc. WT/DS204/R of 02.04.2004, paras 7.160–7.185; Sidak and Singer 2004, pp. 17–19.

  217. 217.

    Kelsey 2008, p. 165.

  218. 218.

    Paragraph 3.1. of the Annex to Resolution 71 (Rev. Guadalajara 2010) containing the Strategic Plan for the Union for 2012–2015.

References

  • Anderson RH, Biksan TK, Law SA, Mitchell BA (1995) Universal access to E-mail: feasibility and societal implications. RAND, Center for Information Revolution Analysis. Online publication. http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR650.pdf

  • Aronson JD (1997) Telecom agreement tops expectations. In: Hufbauer GC, Wada E (eds) Unfinished business: telecommunications after the Uruguay round, Institute for International Economics, pp 15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson JD, Cowhey PF (1988) When countries talk: international trade in telecommunications services. Ballinger, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Batura O (2014) Conflict mediation through international agencies: the case of the UN specialised agency for information and communications technologies. In: Joerges C, Glinski C (eds) The European crisis and the transformation of transnational governance: authoritarian managerialism versus democratic governance. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 317–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Batura O, Krajewski M (2013) Liberalisierung und Regulierung von Telekommunikations- und Gesundheitsdienstleistungen. In: Falke J, Joerges C (eds) Handelsliberalisierung und Sozialregulierung in transnationalen Konstellationen. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp 145–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrens M, Werle R (2003) Lobbying for global telecommunications markets? The political activities of dominant providers in the EU and the US during the basic telecommunications negotiations of the WTO. Paper presented at the ECPR Conference in Marburg. http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/generalconference/marburg/papers/22/3/Woll.pdf

  • Beuermann DW (2011) Telecommunications technologies, Agricultural Profitability, and Child Labor in Rural Peru. Central Reserve Bank of Peru, Working Paper series, DT. No 2011-002. http://www.bcrp.gob.pe/docs/Publicaciones/Documentos-de-Trabajo/2011/Documento-de-Trabajo-02-2011.pdf

  • Blouin C (2000) The WTO agreement on basic telecommunications. Telecommun Policy 24:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronckers M (2000) The WTO reference paper on telecommunications: a model for WTO competition law? In: Bronckers M, Quick R (eds) New directions in international economic law. Kluwer Law International, London, pp 371–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronckers M, Larouche P (2008) A review of the WTO regime for telecommunications services. In: Alexander K, Andenas M (eds) The World Trade Organization and trade in services. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 319–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung CM (2006) Interpreting “Interconnection”: Hermeneutics of the WTO Mexico-Telecommunications case. Jean Monnet Working Paper 03/06, 2006. http://centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/06/060301.pdf

  • Cowhey PF, Aronson JD (2008) Trade in services: telecommunications. In: Mattoo A, Stern RM, Zanini G (eds) A handbook of international trade in services. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 389–436

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A (1994) Telecommunications and politics: the decentralised alternative. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake WJ (1993) Territoriality and intangibility: transborder data flows and national sovereignty. In: Nordenstreng K, Schiller HI (eds) Beyond national sovereignty: international communication in the 1990s. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, pp 259–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake WJ, Nicolaïdis K (1992) Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: “Trade in Services” and the Uruguay Round. Int Org 46:37–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake WJ, Noam EM (1997) The WTO deal on basic telecommunications: Big Bang or Little Whimper? Telecommunications Policy 21:799–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes SC (2005) Can VoIP providers meet their social obligations? Paper presented at telecommunications policy research conference. http://web.si.umich.edu/tprc/papers/2005/502/forbes%20tprc%202005%20final.pdf

  • Fredebeul-Krein M, Freytag A (1997) Telecommunications and WTO discipline: an assessment of the WTO agreement on telecommunication services. Telecommun Policy 21:477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredebeul-Krein M, Freytag A (1999) The case for a more binding WTO Agreement on regulatory principles in telecommunication markets. Telecommun Policy 23:625–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frühbrodt L (2002) Die Liberalisierung der Telekommunikationsdienste. Vom nationalen Monopol zum globalen Wettbewerb. Wiesbaden, Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao H (2008a) Annex on Telecommunications. In: Wolfrum R, Stoll P-T, Feinäugle C (eds) WTO—Trade in services, Max Planck commentaries on world trade law/Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, vol 6. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 683–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao H (2008b) Telecommunications services: reference paper. In: Wolfrum R, Stoll P-T, Feinäugle C (eds) WTO—Trade in services, Max Planck commentaries on world trade law / Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, vol 6. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 718–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Grewlich KW (1997) Konflikt und Ordnung in der globalen Kommunikation: Wettstreit der Staaten und Wettbewerb der Unternehmen. Baden-Baden, Nomos

    Google Scholar 

  • Guermazi B (2004) Exploring the reference paper on regulatory principles. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_E/serv_e/telecom_e/workshop_dec04_e/guermazi_referencepaper.doc

  • Haman A, Zongo G (2005) Universal service and access trends in Central and West Africa: Case studies and prospects. The Panos Institute West Africa Report. www.panos-ao.org/ipao/IMG/pdf_Universal_Service_Access.pdf

  • Holmes P, Young AR (2002) Liberalizing and re-regulating telecommunications in Europe: a common framework and persistent differences. HWWA Discussion Paper 159, Hamburg, HWWA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse R (2012) “Importing” regulatory standards and principles into WTO dispute settlement: the challenge of interpreting the GATS agreements on financial services and telecommunications. In: Lianos I, Odudu O (eds) Regulating trade in services in the EU and the WTO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 445–469

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Intven H, McCarthy Tétrault (eds) (2000) Telecommunications regulation handbook. World Bank publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsey J (2008) Serving whose interests? The political economy of trade in services agreements. Routledge-Cavendish, Abingdon, Oxon

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krajewski M (2008) Article VI GATS: domestic regulation. In: Wolfrum R, Stoll P-T, Feinäugle C (eds) WTO—Trade in services, Max Planck commentaries on world trade law/Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, vol 6. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 165–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Langenfurth M (2000) Der globale Telekommunikationsmarkt: Telekommunikationsdienste als international handelbare Dienstleistung. Peter Lang GmbH, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell R (1994) Multinational organizations and international private networks: Opportunities and constraints. In: Steinfield C, Bauer J, Caby L (eds) Telecommunications in transition: policies, services and technologies in the European Community. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, pp 204–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew B (2003) The WTO agreements on telecommunications. Peter Lang, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • McLarty TL (1999) Liberalized telecommunications trade in the WTO: implications for universal service policy. Federal Commun Law J 51:1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinuevo M (2008) Article XX GATS. In: Wolfrum R, Stoll P-T, Feinäugle C (eds) WTO—Trade in services, Max Planck commentaries on world trade lawMax Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, vol 6. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 445–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosco V (1993) Free trade in communication: building a world business order. In: Nordenstreng K, Schiller HI (eds) Beyond national sovereignty: international communication in the 1990s. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, pp 193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Neven DJ, Mavroidis PC (2003) Mexico—measures affecting telecommunications services (WT/DS204/R: DSR 2004:IV, 1537). A comment on “el mess in TelMex”. In: Horn H, Mavroidis PC (eds) The American Law Institute Reporters’ Studies on WTO case law. Legal and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 758–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam EM (1992) Telecommunications in Europe. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ó Siochrú S (1997) The ITU, the WTO and accounting rates: limited prospects for the South? Javnost: the public. Special Edition, Eur Inst Commun Cult 4:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascó-Font A, Torero M (2001) Infrastructure projects in Telecommunications, roads and electricity in rural areas. Grupo de Análisis para el Desarrollo (GRADE). www.grade.org.pe/infraestructura/doc4BestPractice.pdf

  • Petrazzini B (1996) Global telecom talks: a trillion dollar deal. Institute for International Economics, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pipe GR (1990) Telecommunications. In: Sauvant KP (ed) Messerlin PA. Services in the world economy, the World Bank and the UN Centre on Transnational Corporations, the Uruguay Round, pp 105–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz W (1998) The emergence of a supranational telecommunications regime. In: Sandholtz W, Stone Sweet A (eds) European integration and supranational governance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 134–163

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shi J (2008) Telecommunications Universal Service in China: making the grade on a harmonious information society. J Technol Law Policy 13:115–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley MM, Tusubira FF, Gebreab F, Haggarty L (2002) Telecommunications reform in Uganda. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2864. http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/PapersLinks/1447.pdf

  • Sidak JG, Singer HJ (2004) Überregulation without economics: the World Trade Organization’s decision in the U.S.—Mexico Arbitration on Telecommunications Services. Federal Commun Law J 57:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PA, Townsend D (2006) New models for universal access in Latin America. Summary of main report of project on universal access for telecommunications in Latin America by regulated, World Bank (PPIAF) and ECLAC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarjanne P (1999) Preparing for the next revolution in telecommunications: implementing the WTO Agreement. Telecommun Policy 23:51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tegge A (1994) Die internationale Telekommunikationsunion: organisation und Funktion einer Weltorganisation im Wandel. Baden-Baden, Nomos

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusubira FF (2006) Uganda’s approach to universal access to telecommunications. Liberalisation and universal access to basic services. Telecommunications, water and sanitation, financial services, and electricity. OECD Trade Policy Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuthill L (1996) Users’ rights? The multilateral rules on access to telecommunications. Telecommun Policy 20:89–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuthill L (1997) The GATS and new rules for regulators. Telecommun Policy 21:783–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabi W (2009) Bringing affordable telecommunications services to Uganda: a policy narrative and analysis. Paper written for Association for Progressive Communications (APC). http://www.apc.org/en/system/files/CICEWAUganda_20090908.pdf

  • Wallsten S (2008) Reverse auctions and universal telecommunications service: lessons from global experience. Federal Commun Law J 61:373–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellenius B, Galarza J, Guermazi B (2005) Telecommunications and the WTO: the case of Mexico, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3759. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8479

  • Woodrow BR (1991) Tilting towards a trade regime: The ITU and the Uruguay Round service negotiations. Telecommun Policy 323–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Xavier P (2008) From universal service to universal network access? Info 10:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia J, Lu T-J (2005) Universal service policy in China: building digital bridge for rural community. Paper presented to the 33rd Telecommunications policy research conference, Arlington, Virginia, USA. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1309007

  • Xia J, Lu T-J (2008) Bridging the digital divide for rural communities: the case of China. Telecommun Policy 32:686–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B (2001) Assessing the WTO agreements on China’s telecommunications regulatory reform and industrial liberalization. Telecommun Policy 25:461–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Li X, Taylor R (2007) Universal service reform in the U.S. and China: sustaining the social balance. Paper presented at Pacific Telecommunications council conference “Beyond Telecom”, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. http://www.ptc.org/past_events/ptc07/program/papers/M25_BinZhang.pdf

  • Zhao Yuezhi (2007) “Universal service” and China’s telecommunications miracle: discourse, practices, and post-WTO accession challenges. Info 9:108–121

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Batura .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 T.M.C. Asser Press and the author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Batura, O. (2016). Liberalisation and Regulation of International Trade in Telecommunications Services Through the WTO. In: Universal Service in WTO and EU law. Legal Issues of Services of General Interest. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-081-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-081-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-6265-080-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6265-081-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships