Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Activity Theory and Online Community Education for Sustainability

When Systems Meet Reality

  • Chapter
Activity Theory in Education

Abstract

Community Education for Sustainability (Ef S) using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools and affordances (i.e., possibilities) bring together learning processes occurring within different interconnected dimensions in complex and unpredictable ways. Such complexity calls for the adoption of a systems thinking approach, where the focus is on the existing relationships between the different components composing the learning system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aguayo, C., & Eames, C. (in review). A systems thinking approach for the use of ICT tools for community education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguayo, C. (2014). The use of education for sustainability websites for community education in Chile (PhD dissertation). University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1986). Understanding and facilitating adult learning: A comprehensive analysis of principles and effective practices. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (2005). Speaking nature’s language: Principles for sustainability. In M. Stone & Z. Barlow (Eds.), Ecological literacy: Educating our children for a sustainable world (pp. 18–29). San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (2001). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1–46). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daudi, S. S. (2008). Environmental literacy: A system of best-fit for promoting environmental awareness in low literate communities. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 7(3), 76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Changing practice through research: Changing research through practice. Keynote address, 7th Annual International Conference on Post Compulsory Education and Training, Griffith University, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etchepare, M. S., & Furet, L. R. (2008). Propuesta de un plan de descontaminación para un lago eutroficado. Caso de estudio: Lago Lanalhue (Unpublished masters thesis). Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B. B. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorg, T. (2000). About the unexpected: Complexity of learning based on reciprocity and human agency. Chaos and complexity Theory: Special Interest Newsletter. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.udel.edu/aeracc/library/Fall00.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. (1995). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. Paper presented at the Human-Computer Interaction 5th International Conference, EWHCI, Moscow, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. (1991). The psychology of personal constructs. London, England: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krasny, M. E., & Roth, W.-M. (2010). Environmental education for social ecological system resilience: A perspective from activity theory. Environmental Education Research, 16(5), 545–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanalhue Sustentable. (2011). Lanalhue sustentable: El luchecillo. Retrieved from http://lanalhuesustentable.cl/post.php?id=26

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzeo, N. (2005). Informe de la visita al lago Lanalhue: Consideraciones para el inicio de un plan de monitoreo y manejo (Report). Contulmo, Chile: Universidad de la Republica, Montevideo, Uruguay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2008). The loss of biodiversity as a challenge for sustainable development: How do pupils in Chile and Germany perceive resource dilemmas? Research in Science Education, 39, 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. M. (2005). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Planificación (MIDEPLAN). (2010). Situación de pobreza a nivel de personas, según provincia. Pobreza, CASEN 2006. Retrieved November 8, 2010, from http://www.mideplan.cl/casen/Estadisticas/pobreza.html

  • Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, N., & Kent, J. (2005). The new atlas of planet management. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect (10th anniversary ed.). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra, O., Valdovinos, C., Urrutia, R., Cisternas, M., Habit, E., & Mardones, M. (2003). Caracterización y tendencias tróficas de cinco lagos costeros de Chile central. Limnetica, 22(1–2), 51–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauchard, A., Smith-Ramírez, C., & Ortiz, J. C. (2006). Informe final estudio de diagnóstico del potencial de conservación de la biodiversidad de la empresa Forestal Mininco en la cordillera de Nahuelbuta. Concepción, Chile: Universidad de Concepción & Fundación Senda Darwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipos, Y., Battisti, B., & Grimm, K. (2008). Achieving transformative sustainability learning: Engaging head, hands and heart. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 68–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Ramírez, C. (2004). The Chilean coastal range: A vanishing center of biodiversity and endemism in South American temperate rainforests. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B. (2007). Pedagogy and learning with ICT: Researching the art of innovation. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2005). Linking thinking, education and learning: An introduction. In W. Scotland (Ed.), Linking thinking: New perspectives on thinking and learning for sustainability (Vol. 1). Surrey, England: WWF-UK, Panda House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning: Toward a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (2002). Community education and neighbourhood (Vol. 1). Nottingham, England: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilbury, D., & Wortman, D. (2008). How is community education contributing to sustainability in practice? Applied Environmental education and communication, 7(3), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). (1999). A biodiversity vision for the Valdivian temperate rain forest ecoregion of Chile and Argentina. Valdivia: WWF Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2007). Confronting analytical dilemmas for understanding complex human interactions in design-based research from a cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT) framework. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 451–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AUT University, New Zealand

    Claudio Aguayo

Authors
  1. Claudio Aguayo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Dilani S. P. Gedera P. John Williams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Sense Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aguayo, C. (2016). Activity Theory and Online Community Education for Sustainability. In: Gedera, D.S.P., Williams, P.J. (eds) Activity Theory in Education. SensePublishers, Rotterdam. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-387-2_9

  • Publisher Name: SensePublishers, Rotterdam

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-6300-387-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation