Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Forest-Based Bioproducts Used for Construction and Its Impact on the Environmental Performance of a Building in the Whole Life Cycle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-based Bioproducts

Abstract

Because of the increasing emissions of various pollutants, rapidly growing energy demands, and possible global warming consequences, renewable and nature friendly construction materials are gaining importance. Climate change due to global warming, variations in oil prices and environmental threats have led to significant demand for the wood bio and bio-based products, where construction products represent a significant volume. Construction industry has significant environmental, social and economic impacts on the society. The wood buildings require much lower process energy and result in lower carbon emissions than the buildings of other materials such as brick, aluminium, steel and concrete. If a shift is made towards greater use of wood in buildings, the low fossil fuel requirement for manufacturing wood compared with other materials is much more significant in the long term than the carbon stored in the wood building products. To compare the environmental performance of a building in the whole life cycle, the carbon footprint of 15 insulation materials was calculated. The obtained values were compared to the actual effect of the respective thermal insulation. The transparency of the comparison was achieved by taking into account the specific weight of each material, as well as differences in their thermal conductivity (λ). Moreover, a study of environmental neutrality of different types of insulation materials is presented. For the thermal insulation materials with the lowest environmental impact, the environmental neutrality is reached in only 0.57 heating season and in 7.89 heating seasons for the insulation with the highest environmental impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berglund L, Rowell RM (2005) Handbook of wood chemistry and wood composites. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 279–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry S, Davidson K, Saman W (2014) Defining zero carbon and zero energy homes from a performance-based regulatory perspective. Energy Effi 7:303–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodig J, Jayne B (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York 712

    Google Scholar 

  • BREEAM (2014) www.breeam.org. Accessed 1 May 2014

  • Buchanan AH (2006) Can timber buildings help reduce global CO2 emissions? In: Proceedings of the world conference on timber engineering. Portland, Oregon, 6–10 Aug

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan AH, Bry Levineb S (1999) Wood-based building materials and atmospheric carbon emissions. In: Environmental science and policy. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, pp 427–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan AH, Honey BG (1994) Energy and carbon dioxide im-plications of building construction. Energy Build 20:205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Air Resource Board (CARB) (2004) Formaldehyde in the home. http://www.arb.cagov/research/indoor/formaldGL08-04.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2014

  • CEN/TC 350 (2012) Sustainability of construction works

    Google Scholar 

  • Citherlet S, Defaux T (2007) Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a single family house during its whole life span. Build Environ 42:591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change (2001) IPCC third assessment report. The scientific basis. http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/. Accessed 03 Mar 2010

  • Dehne M, Krueger U (2006) Fire protection in multi-story timber construction, detail. no. 10/2006, pp 1142–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVany MC (2007) The serious public health issues resulting from formaldehyde exposures within FEMA travel trailers issued to hurricane disaster victims, and recommended action items. Testimony before committee on oversight and government reform U.S: house of representatives. http://s3.amazonaws.com/propublica/assets/formaldehyde/devany_testimony_070719.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2014

  • Ding CKC (2008) Sustainable construction: the role of environmental assessment tools. J Environ Manage 86:451–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinwoodie JM (2000) Timber: its nature and behaviour, 2nd edn. EFN Spon, London 257 p

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent 3.0 (2013) Swiss centre for life cycle inventories. Dübendorf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) (2012) EN 15804: sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—core rules for the product category of construction products

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament, Council (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Directive. Brussels: European parliament European parliament. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32008L0098:EN:NOT. Accessed 15 Sept 2013

  • Foliente G, Leicester B, Wang C, Mackenzie C, Cole I (2002) Durability design for wood construction. Forest Prod J 52(1):10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Formaldehyde Council, Inc. (2007) Formaldehyde and human health. http://www.formaldehyde.org/newsroom/documents/FormaldehydeandHumanHealth.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2014

  • Friedman D, Bliss S, Wiley S (2009) Guide to finding and reducing common indoor air pollutants and contamination sources. Inspect a pedia. http://www.inspect-ny.com/BestPractices/IAQ_Hazard_Table1.htm. Accessed 15 June 2014

  • Gilbert NL, Guay M, Gauvin D, Dietz RN, Chan CC, Levesque B (2008) Air change rate and concentration of formaldehyde in residential indoor air. Atmos Environ 42(10):2424–2428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson L, Pingoud K, Sathre R (2006) Carbon dioxide balance of wood substitution: comparing concrete- and wood-framed buildings, Springer, Berlin. Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy. Environmental and energy systems studies. Lund University, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapio A, Viitaniemi P (2008) A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environ Impact Asses 28:469–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimlich JE (2008) Formaldehyde. The invisible environment fact sheet series. http://ohioline.osu.edu/cd-fact/pdf/0198.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2014

  • ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Standard. Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14025 (2009) Environmental labels and declarations—type III environmental declarations—principles and procedures, standard. International Standards Organisation, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson B (1995), Bygg- och Rivningsmateriali Kretsloppet (Recycling of building and demolition materials). Report 17:1995, Swedish Building Research Council, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen T, Kellomaki S, Pussinen A (1994) Role of wood-based products in absorbing atmospheric carbon. Silva Fennica 28(2):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karjalainen T, Pussinen A, Kellomaki S, Makipaa R (1999) Scenarios for the carbon balance of finnish forests and wood products. Environ Sci Policy 2(2):165–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim CW, Song JS, Ahu YS, Park SH, Park JW, Noh JH, Hong CS (2001) Occupational asthma due to formaldehyde. Yonsei Med J 42(4):440–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kitek Kuzman M, Kutnar A (2014) Contemporary Slovenian timber architecture for sustainability. Green energy and technology. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. ISSN 1865-3529

    Google Scholar 

  • Košir M, Krainer A, Dovjak M, Perdan R, Kristl Ž (2010) Alternative to the conventional heating and cooling systems in public buildings. J Mech Eng 56(9):575–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunič R (2007) Planning an assessment of the impact of accelerated ageing of bituminous sheets on constructional complexes: doctoral thesis. University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, Ljubljana

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunič R, Krainer A (2009) Economical thickness of thermal insulation layers in ETICS façade systems. Gradbeni vestnik 58(2): 306–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunič R, Krainer A (2010) Economical thickness of thermal insulation layers in flat roofs. Gradbeni vestnik 59(1): 6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutnar A, Hill C (2014) Assessment of carbon footprinting in the wood industry. In: Muthu SS (ed) Assessment of carbon footprint in different industrial sectors, vol 2, (EcoProduction). Singapore (etc.), Springer, cop. 2014, pp 135–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann S (2013) Low carbon construction systems using prefabricated engineered solid wood panels for urban infill to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Sustain Cities Soc J. Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent T (2007) LEEDing on formaldehyde in California. Healthy building news. http://www.healthybuilding.net/news/070511formaldehyde.html. Accessed 20 June 2014

  • Lippke B, Wilson J, Perez-Garcia J, Boyer J, Meil J (2004) CORRIM: life-cycle environmental performance of renewable building materials. For Prod J 54(6):8–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Maclaren JP, Wakelin SJ (1991) Forestry and forest products as a carbon sink in New Zealand. FRI Bull No 162. Ministry of Forestry, Rotorua, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantanis G, Vouli E, Gonitsioti C, Ntalos G (2007) Formaldehyde in indoor air of new apartments in Greece. COST action E49 conference, measurement and control of VOC emissions from wood-based panels. http://users.teilar.gr/~mantanis/Formaldehyde.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2014

  • Maruo YY, Yamada T, Nakamura J (2007) Sensor element for indoor formaldehyde measurement. NNT technical review. https://www.ntt-review.jp/archive/ntttechnical.php?contents=ntr200910sf5.html. Accessed 20 June 2014

  • Minnesota Department of Health Fact Sheet (2010) Formaldehyde facts. http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/indoorair/voc/formaldehyde.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2014

  • Moody RC, Sherwood GE (1986) Light-framed construction research at USDA forest products laboratory—a status report. Appl Eng Agric 2(2):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newsham GR, Mancini S, Birt BJ (2009) Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but. Energy Build 41:897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norbäck D, Nordström K (2008) Sick building syndrome in relation to air exchange rate, CO2, room temperature and relative air humidity in university computer classrooms: an experimental study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oanh NTK, Hung YT (2004) Indoor air pollution control. In: Wang LK, Pereira NC, Hung YT (eds) Handbook of environmental engineering, vol 2: advanced air and noise pollution control

    Google Scholar 

  • Offermann F, Robertson J, Brennan S, Springer D (2007) Window usage, ventilation, and formaldehyde concentrations in new California homes: summer field sessions. http://www.ieesf.com/pdf/SummerFieldResults.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2014

  • PAS 2050 (2011) Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfundstein M et al (2008) Insulating materials. Institut für Internationale Architektur-Dokumentation, Munich

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Premrov M, Žegarac-Leskovar V (2013) Energy-efficient timber-glass houses. Green energy and technology. Springer, London, 178 p

    Google Scholar 

  • PURES (2010) Rules on efficient use of energy in buildings. Off J Rep Slovenia, No. 52/2010, XX, 7840–7847

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthammer T, Mentese S, Marutzky R (2010) Formaldehyde in the indoor environment. Chem Rev 110(4):2536–2572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlamadinger B, Marland G (1996) The role of forest and bioenergy strategies in the global carbon cycle. Biomass Bioenergy 10:275–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simapro (2009). SimaPro analyst indefinite, product ecology consultants. PEC, The Netherlands, www.pre.nl/default.htm

  • Sinha A, Kutnar A (2012) Carbon footprint versus performance of aluminium, plastic and wood window frames from cradle to gate. Build (Basel) 2:542–553

    Google Scholar 

  • STAT (2012) www.stat.si. Statistical office of the Republic of Slovenia. Accessed 25 June 2012

  • Vattenfall (2015) www.vattenfall.com. Accessed 25 Jan 2015

  • Wegener G, Pahler A, Tratzmiller M (2010) Bauen mit Holz = aktiver Klimaschutz. Ein Leitfaden, Munich, Holzforschung Muenchen

    Google Scholar 

  • Winjum JK, Brown S, Schlamadinger B (1998) Forest harvests and wood products: sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide. For Sci 44(2):272–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabalza I, Aranda A, Scarpellini S, Diaz S (2009) Life cycle assessment in building sector: state of the art and assessment of environmental impact for building materials. In: 1st international energy, life cycle assessment and sustainability workshop and symposium (ELCAS), Nisyros, Greece

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Jamova cesta 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Roman Kunič

Authors
  1. Roman Kunič
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman Kunič .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia

    Andreja Kutnar

  2. Environmental Services Manager-Asia, SGS Hong Kong Limited, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

    Subramanian Senthilkannan Muthu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kunič, R. (2016). Forest-Based Bioproducts Used for Construction and Its Impact on the Environmental Performance of a Building in the Whole Life Cycle. In: Kutnar, A., Muthu, S. (eds) Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-based Bioproducts. Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0655-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation