Skip to main content

Localized Comparison of Sleep Stage Scoring Between PSG and Wearable Devices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
6th International Conference on the Development of Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam (BME6) (BME 2017)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 63))

  • 5095 Accesses

Abstract

Wearable devices have been recently proposed as an alternative to the gold standard—polysomnography system (PSG)—in several particular circumstances. The past decade has seen a renewed importance in this area, resulting in various researches attempted to evaluate the validity and reliability of this kind of surrogate devices.​ This paper seeks to address the issue of consensus in results reached by both wearable devices and PSG system. Specifically, we propose an algorithm to locally detect and quantify the discrepancies among the wearable devices and PSG system in scoring sleep stages. Within this study, the developed validation algorithm was performed using the data collected from 14 human subjects, ​each of whom wears 4 wearable devices simultaneously to retrieve the signals of interest associated​ with PSG system as a benchmark overnight at our sleep lab ​for sleep monitoring and record. The gist of the  algorithm is to compute the differences between two consecutive points in the hypnogram—a graph that represents the stages of sleep over the time—to estimate the monotone correlation of the sleep stages between wearable device and PSG. Our main goals are to determine sleep periods where the most considerable discriminants happen, and to quantify the levels of disagreement between two sorts of the instrument. Preliminary results show that the localized correlation algorithm can detect the points of the most significant agreement and disagreement of wearable devices benchmarked to PSG. The validation method for this algorithm will soon be an inevitably critical issue to be verified and developed for the robustness and reliability of wearable devices in comparison with gold standard PSG system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kupfer DJ et al (1974) Psychomotor activity in affective states. Arch Gen Psychiatry 30(6):765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McPartland RJ, Kupfer DJ, Gordon Foster F (1976) The movement-activated recording monitor: A third-generation motor-activity monitoring system. Behav Res Methods Instrum 8(4):357–360

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colburn TR et al (1976) An ambulatory activity monitor with solid state memory. ISA Trans 15(2):149–154

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kripke DF et al (1978) Wrist actigraphic measures of sleep and rhythms. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 44(5):674–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mullaney D, Kripke D, Messin S (1979) Wrist-actigraphic estimation of sleep time. Sleep 3(1):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Webster JB et al (1982)  An activity-based sleep monitor system for ambulatory use. Sleep 5(4):389–399.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sivertsen B et al (2006) A comparison of actigraphy and polysomnography in older adults treated for chronic primary insomnia. Sleep N Y Westchester 29(10):1353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Souza L et al (2003) Further validation of actigraphy for sleep studies. Sleep N Y Westchester 26(1):81–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sadeh A (2011) The role and validity of actigraphy in sleep medicine: an update. Sleep Med Rev 15(4):259–267

    Google Scholar 

  10. So K et al (2005) Actigraphy correctly predicts sleep behavior in infants who are younger than six months, when compared with polysomnography. Pediatr Res 58(4):761–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sadeh A et al (1995) The role of actigraphy in the evaluation of sleep disorders. Sleep 18(4):288–302

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan KA et al (2012) Evaluating sleep in bipolar disorder: comparison between actigraphy, polysomnography, and sleep diary. Bipolar Disord 14(8):870–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meltzer LJ et al (2012) Direct comparison of two new actigraphs and polysomnography in children and adolescents. Sleep 35(1):159–166

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karandikar K, Le TQ, Sa-ngasoongsong A, Wongdhamma W, Bukkapatnam ST (2013) Detection of sleep apnea events via tracking nonlinear dynamic cardio-respiratory coupling from electrocardiogram signals. 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference (pp 1358–1361)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mcardle N, Douglas NJ (2001) Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on sleep architecture in the sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164(8):1459–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hudson JI et al (1992) Good sleep, bad sleep: a meta-analysis of polysomnographic measures in insomnia, depression, and narcolepsy. Biol Psychiatry 32(11):958–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17.  Le TQ, Cheng C, Sangasoongsong A, Wongdhamma W, Bukkapatnam ST (2013)  Wireless wearable multisensory suite and real-time prediction of obstructive sleep apnea episodes. IEEE J Trans Eng Health Med 1:2700109.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tilmanne J et al (2009) Algorithms for sleep–wake identification using actigraphy: a comparative study and new results. J Sleep Res 18(1):85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Staudenmayer J et al (2009) An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer. J Appl Physiol 107(4):1300–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pober DM et al (2006) Development of novel techniques to classify physical activity mode using accelerometers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 38(9):1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hall JE (2015) Guyton and Hall textbook of medical physiology. Elsevier Health Sciences, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee-Chiong TL (2006) Sleep: a comprehensive handbook. Wiley Online Library, USA

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilde-Frenz J, Schulz H (1983) Rate and distribution of body movements during sleep in humans. Percept Mot Skills 56(1):275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Middelkoop HA et al (1993) Actigraphically recorded motor activity and immobility across sleep cycles and stages in healthy male subjects. J Sleep Res 2(1):28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bunde A et al (2000) Correlated and uncorrelated regions in heart-rate fluctuations during sleep. Phys Rev Lett 85(17):3736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hedner J et al (2011) Sleep staging based on autonomic signals: a multi-center validation study. J Clin Sleep Med 7(3):301–306

    Google Scholar 

  27. Le TQ, Bukkapatnam ST (2016) Nonlinear Dynamics Forecasting of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Onsets. PloS One 11(11):e0164406

    Google Scholar 

  28. Le TQ, Bukkapatnam ST, Benjamin BA, Wilkins BA, Komanduri R (2013) Topology and Random-Walk Network Representation of Cardiac Dynamics for Localization of Myocardial Infarction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 2325–2331

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Vietnam National University HCM City under the grant No. 1161/QĐ-ĐHQG-KHCN. The authors would like to thanks the technician team of the Clinical Sleep Lab at Biomedical Engineering Department-Ho Chi Minh City International University of Vietnam National University for their help in organizing, collecting and revising the data. We also would like to thanks Ms. Nguyen Thi Thu Hang for her language editing work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trung Q. Le .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Huynh, Q.T.B., Bui, P.N., Le, T.Q. (2018). Localized Comparison of Sleep Stage Scoring Between PSG and Wearable Devices. In: Vo Van, T., Nguyen Le, T., Nguyen Duc, T. (eds) 6th International Conference on the Development of Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam (BME6) . BME 2017. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 63. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4361-1_139

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4361-1_139

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4360-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4361-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics