Skip to main content

Fiscal Deficit and Economic Growth Linkage in India: Impact of FRBM Act

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Issues in Indian Fiscal Federalism

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

Abstract

The major objective of the study is to examine the impact of fiscal deficit on economic growth in India using Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach. It also analyzes whether the execution of Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act has any influence on the fiscal deficit-economic growth linkage in India. The ARDL Bounds Testing Approaches to Cointegration confirm the long-run relationship among the selected variables. The estimated results show that fiscal deficit has an adverse effect on economic growth in both the long run and short run in India. The Pre-FRBM Act regime analysis reveals that implementation of FRBM Act has influenced and weakens the relationship between fiscal deficit and economic growth in India. The Government should contain the fiscal deficit and should try to achieve the target set by the FRBM Act.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FRBM Act (2003) came into effect from July 5, 2004 in India. Again the Government of India had set up a FRBM Review Committee on 2016 to evaluate the FRBM Act, 2003. It implies that mounting fiscal deficit is a serious concern for the economy.

  2. 2.

    Fiscal deficit of the central government is used here for several reasons. First, combined fiscal deficit data isn’t available during the study period. However, it is available from 1980–1981 onwards. Second, policy makers give much more importance to fiscal deficit of the central government in India than other deficits. Third, FRBM Act (2003) was enacted to impose stringent fiscal discipline on the central government in its overall fiscal and macroeconomic management operations. Also one of the objectives of the study is to examine the influence of the FRBM Act. Fourth, FRBM Act isn’t accepted by all the states in India. Hence, the study has used the fiscal deficit of the central government only.

  3. 3.

    Time series data on employment in the unorganized sector is not available in India. Data constraint restricts to use organized employment for the proxy for employment in the analysis.

  4. 4.

    However, Post-FRBM act period is not analyzed due to insufficient observation.

References

  • Adam CS, Bevan DL (2005) Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries. J Public Econ 89:571–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora H, Dua P (1993) Budget deficits, domestic investment, and trade deficits. Contemp Policy Issues 11:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Avila J (2011) Fiscal deficit, macro-uncertainty, and growth in Argentina. Available at http://www.ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/documentos/456.pdf. CEMA. Working Papers no-456

  • Bose N, Haque ME, Osborn DR (2007) Public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing countries. The Manchester School 75:533–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Brender A, Drazen A (2008) How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. Am Econ Rev 98:2203–2220

    Google Scholar 

  • Burney NA, Akhtar N (1992) Government budget deficits and exchange rate determination: evidence from Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev 31:871–882

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula RJ (1995) The impact of federal government budget deficits on economic growth in the United States: an empirical investigation, 1955-1992. Int Rev Econ Financ 4:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalyop GT (2010) Fiscal deficits and the growth of domestic output in Nigeria. Jos J Econ 4:153–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrat AF (2000) Are budget deficits inflationary? A reconsideration of the evidence. Appl Econ 7:633–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Rebelo S (1993) Fiscal policy and economic growth: an empirical investigation. J Monet Econ 32:417–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W et al (1994) Public sector deficits and macroeconomic performance. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner R, Pierper PJ (1984) A new view of the federal debt and budget deficits. Am Econ Rev 74:11–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Faria JR, Carneiro FG (2001) Does high inflation affect growth in the long and short run? J Appl Econ 4:89–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Fatima et al (2011) Fiscal deficit and economic growth: an analysis of Pakistan’s economy. Int J Trade Econ Financ 2:501–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer S (1993) The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. J Monet Econ 32:485–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghali KH (1997) Government spending and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. J Econ Dev 22:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S et al (2005) Fiscal policy, expenditure composition, and growth in low-income countries. J Int Money Financ 24:441–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Karras G (1994) Macroeconomic effects of budget deficits: further international evidence. J Int Money Financ 13:190–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Keho Y (2010) Budget deficits and economic growth: causality evidence and policy implications for AEMU countries. Eur J Econ Financ Adm Sci 18:99–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallik G, Chowdhury A (2001) Inflation and economic growth: evidence from four South American countries. Asia-Pacific Dev J 8:123–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson MA, Singh RD (1994) The deficit-growth connection: some recent evidence from developing countries. Econ Dev Cult Change 43:167–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Osinubi TS, Dauda ROS, Olaleru OE (2010) Budget deficits, external debt and economic growth in Nigeria. Singap Econ Rev 55:491–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH et al (2001) Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. J Appl Econ 16:289–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for unit root in the time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan EC (2006) Fiscal deficits, inflation and economic growth in a successful open developing economy. Rev Appl Econ 2:129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L et al (2012) Fiscal deficits, economic growth and government debt in the USA. Camb J Econ 36:189–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ranjan Kumar Mohanty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

Autoregressive Distributed Lag Estimates for Whole Period (1970–1971 to 2012–2013)

ARDL(2,0,0,0,0) selected based on Schwarz Bayesian Criterion

Dependent variable is LGDPF

Regressor

Coefficient

Standard Error

T-Ratio[Prob]

LGDPF(-1)

0.327

0.123

2.662[0.012]

LGDPF(-2)

0.449

0.116

3.889[0.000]

LFSDF

−0.028

0.011

−2.589[0.014]

LGDCF

0.063

0.039

1.622[0.114]

EMPLG

0.011

0.002

4.369[0.000]

INFLA

−0.002

0.6369E−3

−3.105[0.004]

Constant

1.770

0.369

4.787[0.000]

Trend

0.0132

0.002

5.375[0.000]

  1. R-Squared: 0.99, R-Bar-Squared: 0.99, F-stat. F(7, 33):8995.9[0.000]
  2. Akaike Info. Criterion: 105.594 Schwarz Bayesian Criterion; 98.740
  3. DW-statistic; 1.757

Appendix 2

Autoregressive Distributed Lag Estimates for Sub-period (1970–1971 to 2003–2004)

ARDL(1,0,0,1,0) selected based on Schwarz Bayesian Criterion

Dependent variable is LGDPF

Regressor

Coefficient

Standard error

T-Ratio[Prob]

LGDPF(-1)

0.538

0.085

6.312[0.000]

LFSDF

−0.072

0.016

−4.466[0.000]

LGDCF

0.109

0.048

2.244[0.034]

EMPLG

0.003

0.003

1.009[0.323]

EMPLG(-1)

−0.009

0.003

−3.266[0.003]

INFLA

−0.003

0.7255E−3

−4.243[0.000]

C

3.776

0.705

5.356[0.000]

T

0.0221

0.004

5.396[0.000]

  1. R-Squared: 0.99, R-Bar-Squared: 0.99, F-stat. F(7, 25): 3884.0[0.000]
  2. Akaike Info. Criterion: 85.289 Schwarz Bayesian Criterion: 79.303
  3. DW-statistic: 2.321, Durbin’s h-statistic 1.058[0.290]

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mohanty, R.K. (2018). Fiscal Deficit and Economic Growth Linkage in India: Impact of FRBM Act. In: Khan, N. (eds) Challenges and Issues in Indian Fiscal Federalism. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6217-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6217-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6216-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6217-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics