Abstract
The major objective of the study is to examine the impact of fiscal deficit on economic growth in India using Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach. It also analyzes whether the execution of Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management (FRBM) Act has any influence on the fiscal deficit-economic growth linkage in India. The ARDL Bounds Testing Approaches to Cointegration confirm the long-run relationship among the selected variables. The estimated results show that fiscal deficit has an adverse effect on economic growth in both the long run and short run in India. The Pre-FRBM Act regime analysis reveals that implementation of FRBM Act has influenced and weakens the relationship between fiscal deficit and economic growth in India. The Government should contain the fiscal deficit and should try to achieve the target set by the FRBM Act.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
FRBM Act (2003) came into effect from July 5, 2004 in India. Again the Government of India had set up a FRBM Review Committee on 2016 to evaluate the FRBM Act, 2003. It implies that mounting fiscal deficit is a serious concern for the economy.
- 2.
Fiscal deficit of the central government is used here for several reasons. First, combined fiscal deficit data isn’t available during the study period. However, it is available from 1980–1981 onwards. Second, policy makers give much more importance to fiscal deficit of the central government in India than other deficits. Third, FRBM Act (2003) was enacted to impose stringent fiscal discipline on the central government in its overall fiscal and macroeconomic management operations. Also one of the objectives of the study is to examine the influence of the FRBM Act. Fourth, FRBM Act isn’t accepted by all the states in India. Hence, the study has used the fiscal deficit of the central government only.
- 3.
Time series data on employment in the unorganized sector is not available in India. Data constraint restricts to use organized employment for the proxy for employment in the analysis.
- 4.
However, Post-FRBM act period is not analyzed due to insufficient observation.
References
Adam CS, Bevan DL (2005) Fiscal deficits and growth in developing countries. J Public Econ 89:571–597
Arora H, Dua P (1993) Budget deficits, domestic investment, and trade deficits. Contemp Policy Issues 11:29–44
Avila J (2011) Fiscal deficit, macro-uncertainty, and growth in Argentina. Available at http://www.ucema.edu.ar/publicaciones/download/documentos/456.pdf. CEMA. Working Papers no-456
Bose N, Haque ME, Osborn DR (2007) Public expenditure and economic growth: a disaggregated analysis for developing countries. The Manchester School 75:533–556
Brender A, Drazen A (2008) How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. Am Econ Rev 98:2203–2220
Burney NA, Akhtar N (1992) Government budget deficits and exchange rate determination: evidence from Pakistan. Pak Dev Rev 31:871–882
Cebula RJ (1995) The impact of federal government budget deficits on economic growth in the United States: an empirical investigation, 1955-1992. Int Rev Econ Financ 4:245–252
Dalyop GT (2010) Fiscal deficits and the growth of domestic output in Nigeria. Jos J Econ 4:153–173
Darrat AF (2000) Are budget deficits inflationary? A reconsideration of the evidence. Appl Econ 7:633–636
Easterly W, Rebelo S (1993) Fiscal policy and economic growth: an empirical investigation. J Monet Econ 32:417–458
Easterly W et al (1994) Public sector deficits and macroeconomic performance. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, Oxford and New York
Eisner R, Pierper PJ (1984) A new view of the federal debt and budget deficits. Am Econ Rev 74:11–29
Faria JR, Carneiro FG (2001) Does high inflation affect growth in the long and short run? J Appl Econ 4:89–105
Fatima et al (2011) Fiscal deficit and economic growth: an analysis of Pakistan’s economy. Int J Trade Econ Financ 2:501–504
Fischer S (1993) The role of macroeconomic factors in growth. J Monet Econ 32:485–512
Ghali KH (1997) Government spending and economic growth in Saudi Arabia. J Econ Dev 22:165–172
Gupta S et al (2005) Fiscal policy, expenditure composition, and growth in low-income countries. J Int Money Financ 24:441–463
Karras G (1994) Macroeconomic effects of budget deficits: further international evidence. J Int Money Financ 13:190–210
Keho Y (2010) Budget deficits and economic growth: causality evidence and policy implications for AEMU countries. Eur J Econ Financ Adm Sci 18:99–104
Mallik G, Chowdhury A (2001) Inflation and economic growth: evidence from four South American countries. Asia-Pacific Dev J 8:123–133
Nelson MA, Singh RD (1994) The deficit-growth connection: some recent evidence from developing countries. Econ Dev Cult Change 43:167–191
Osinubi TS, Dauda ROS, Olaleru OE (2010) Budget deficits, external debt and economic growth in Nigeria. Singap Econ Rev 55:491–521
Pesaran MH et al (2001) Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationship. J Appl Econ 16:289–326
Phillips PC, Perron P (1988) Testing for unit root in the time series regression. Biometrika 75:335–346
Tan EC (2006) Fiscal deficits, inflation and economic growth in a successful open developing economy. Rev Appl Econ 2:129–139
Taylor L et al (2012) Fiscal deficits, economic growth and government debt in the USA. Camb J Econ 36:189–204
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Autoregressive Distributed Lag Estimates for Whole Period (1970–1971 to 2012–2013)
ARDL(2,0,0,0,0) selected based on Schwarz Bayesian Criterion Dependent variable is LGDPF | |||
Regressor | Coefficient | Standard Error | T-Ratio[Prob] |
LGDPF(-1) | 0.327 | 0.123 | 2.662[0.012] |
LGDPF(-2) | 0.449 | 0.116 | 3.889[0.000] |
LFSDF | −0.028 | 0.011 | −2.589[0.014] |
LGDCF | 0.063 | 0.039 | 1.622[0.114] |
EMPLG | 0.011 | 0.002 | 4.369[0.000] |
INFLA | −0.002 | 0.6369E−3 | −3.105[0.004] |
Constant | 1.770 | 0.369 | 4.787[0.000] |
Trend | 0.0132 | 0.002 | 5.375[0.000] |
Appendix 2
Autoregressive Distributed Lag Estimates for Sub-period (1970–1971 to 2003–2004)
ARDL(1,0,0,1,0) selected based on Schwarz Bayesian Criterion Dependent variable is LGDPF | |||
Regressor | Coefficient | Standard error | T-Ratio[Prob] |
LGDPF(-1) | 0.538 | 0.085 | 6.312[0.000] |
LFSDF | −0.072 | 0.016 | −4.466[0.000] |
LGDCF | 0.109 | 0.048 | 2.244[0.034] |
EMPLG | 0.003 | 0.003 | 1.009[0.323] |
EMPLG(-1) | −0.009 | 0.003 | −3.266[0.003] |
INFLA | −0.003 | 0.7255E−3 | −4.243[0.000] |
C | 3.776 | 0.705 | 5.356[0.000] |
T | 0.0221 | 0.004 | 5.396[0.000] |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mohanty, R.K. (2018). Fiscal Deficit and Economic Growth Linkage in India: Impact of FRBM Act. In: Khan, N. (eds) Challenges and Issues in Indian Fiscal Federalism. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6217-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6217-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-6216-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-6217-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)