Skip to main content

Improving Stability of Welding Model with ME-ELM

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Transactions on Intelligent Welding Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Transactions on Intelligent Welding Manufacturing ((TRINWM))

Abstract

Welding shape is important in evaluating welding quality, but accurate predictive model is hard to achieve, because welding is a complex nonlinear process, and the sampled data are inevitably contaminated. Extreme learning machine (ELM) is used to construct a single-hidden layer feedforward network (SLFN) in our study, for improving stability of welding model, M-estimation is combined with ELM and a new algorithm named ME-ELM is developed; researches indicate that it works more effective than BP and other variants of ELM in reducing influence, furthermore, it can improve the model’s anti-disturbance and robustness performance even if the data are seriously contaminated. Real TIG welding models are constructed with ME-ELM, by comparing with BP, multiple nonlinear regression (MNR), and linear regression (LR), conclusions can be gotten that ME-ELM can resist the interference effectively and has the highest accuracy in predicting the welding shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Du B, Cheng Y, Li CF (2012) Analysis of global welding market. Chin Mech Manuf Digest 2:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  2. American Welding Society (2016) Welding handbook. Welding Handbook committee, Miami, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  3. Murugana N, Gunaraj V (2015) Prediction and control of weld bead geometry and shape relationships in submerged arc welding of pipes. J Mater Process Technol 168(3):478–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim IS, Basu A, Siores E (1996) Mathematical models for control of weld bead penetration in the GMAW process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 12(6):393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rao PS, Gupta OP, Murty SSN et al (2009) Effect of process parameters and mathematical model for the prediction of bead geometry in pulsed GMA welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(5–6):496–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pal K, Pla SK (2011) Soft computing methods used for the modeling and optimization of gas metal arc welding. Int J Manuf Res 6(1):15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murugan N, Parmar RS (1994) Effects of MIG process parameters on the geometry of the bead in the automatic surfacing of stainless steel. J Mater Process 41(4):381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi YH, Zhang ZP, Huang J (2013) Sensitivity model for prediction of bead geometry in underwater wet flux cored arc welding. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23(7):1977–1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palani PK, Murugan N (2006) Development of mathematical models for prediction of weld bead geometry in cladding by flux cored arc welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30(7–8):669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tarng YS, Juang SC, Chang CH (2002) The use of grey based Taguchi methods to determine submerged arc welding process parameters in hard facing. J Mater Process Technol 128(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Biswas A, Bhaumik S, Majumdar G et al (2011) Bead geometry optimization of submerged arc weld: exploration of weighted principal component analysis (WPCA). Appl Mech Mater 110:790–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Satheesh M, Dhas JER (2014) Multi objective optimization of weld parameters of boiler steel using fuzzy based desirability function. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 7(1):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mondal P, Bose D (2015) Optimization of the process parameters for MIG welding of AISI 304 and IS 1079 using fuzzy logic method. Int Res J Eng Technol 2(8):483–488

    Google Scholar 

  14. Katherasan D, Elias JV, Sathiya P et al (2014) Simulation and parameter optimization of flux cored arc welding using artificial neural network and particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Intell Manuf 25:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Subashini L, Vasudevan M (2012) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)-based models for predicting the weld bead width and depth of penetration from the infrared thermal image of the weld pool. Metall Mater Trans 43(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CK (2006) Extreme learning machine: theory and applications. Neuro Comput 70:489–501

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frénay B et al (2010) Using SVMs with randomized feature spaces: an extreme learning approach. In: 18th European symposium on artificial neural networks, vol 2010, D-side publication, Bruges, pp 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang GB, Ding X, Zhou H (2010) Optimization method based extreme learning machine for classification. Neuro Comput 74(12):155–163

    Google Scholar 

  19. Widrow B, Greenblatt A, Kim Y et al (2013) The no-prop algorithm: a new learning algorithm for multilayer neural networks. Neural Networks 37(1):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang GB, Bai Z, Kasun LLC (2015) Local receptive fields based extreme learning machine. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 10(2):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang GB (2014) An insight into extreme learning machines: random neurons, random features and kernels. Cogn Comput 6(3):376–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hampel FR, Ronchetti EM, Rousseeuw PJ et al (2011) Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Stigler SM (2010) The changing history of robustness. Am Stat 64(4):277–281

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Street JO, Carroll RJ, Ruppert D (1988) A note on computing robust regression estimates via iteratively reweighted least squares. Am Stat 42(2):152–154

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ye JX (2013) Wet welding platform design based on ultrasonic sensor. Int J Appl Crypt 5(2):707–714

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ye JX, Zhang H (2008) Automatic underwater arc welding seam-tracking system based on flux-core wire and rotating arc sensor. Trans China Weld 29(3):141–144

    Google Scholar 

  27. Juang SC, Tarng YS, Lii HR (1998) A comparison between the back-propagation and counter-propagation networks in the modeling of the TIG welding process. J Mater Process Technol 75(1–3):54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagesha DS, Datta GL (2010) Genetic algorithm for optimization of welding variables for height to width ratio and application of ANN for prediction of bead geometry for TIG welding process. Appl Soft Comput 10(3):897–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Du JH (2010) A study on underwater welding seam forming and tracking based on rotating arc sensor. Dissertation, South China University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ye JX, Zhang H (2009) Research of intellectual calculation in welding parameters optimization. Mater Rev 23(12):69–72

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is partially founded by the Open Project Program of Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Precision Drive & Control (PLPDC-KFKT-201625), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51665016), the JiangXi Province Science Foundation (20151BAB207047).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianxiong Ye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ye, J., Ye, H., Li, Z., Peng, X., Zhou, J., Guo, B. (2018). Improving Stability of Welding Model with ME-ELM. In: Chen, S., Zhang, Y., Feng, Z. (eds) Transactions on Intelligent Welding Manufacturing. Transactions on Intelligent Welding Manufacturing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7043-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7043-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-7042-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-7043-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics