Skip to main content

Sensory Impact: Memory, Affect and Sensory Ethnography at Official Memory Sites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Memory Research

Abstract

This chapter locates the focus of inquiry in the senses, feelings, imaginations, and memories of visitors to memory sites. It discusses how research participants define such places in their own terms, with meanings contextualised by their thoughts and feelings. In doing so, it focuses on what photographs and video make possible in terms of understanding someone else’s experience of a memory site. It argues that the power of such an approach lies in its capacity to bring new knowledge into being that did not exist before, through the visual material created as a result of the encounter between researcher and research participant, and that this material helps carry the experience of the memory site forward into the future as people revisit and consider it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B. (2014). Encountering affect: Capacities, apparatuses, conditions. Ashgate: Farnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, D. (2015). Affect, heritage, feeling. In E. Waterton & S. Watson (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of contemporary heritage research (pp. 177–190). London: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drozdzewski, D., De Nardi, S., & Waterton, E. (2016a). Geographies of memory, place and identity: Intersections in remembering war and conflict. Geography Compass, 10(11), 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drozdzewski, D., De Nardi, S., & Waterton, E. (Eds.). (2016b). Memory, place and identity: Commemoration and remembrance of war and conflict. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2005a). The ghosts of industrial ruins: Ordering and disordering memory in excessive space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 23, 829–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T. (2005b). Industrial ruins: Space, aesthetics and materiality. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fors, V. (2013). Teenagers’ multisensory routes for learning in the museum. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 268–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L., Nienass, B., & Daniell, R. (2016). Memory, materiality, sensuality. Memory Studies, 9(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, J. (1994). Memory and identity: The history of a relationship. In J. Gillis (Ed.), Commemorations: The politics of national identity (pp. 3–24). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halilovich, H. (2016). Re-imaging and re-imagining the past after ‘memoricide’: Intimate archives as inscribed memories of the missing. Archival Science, 16, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17(1), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D. (2014). Introduction to sensory museology. The Senses and Society, 9(3), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O. (2011). Geography, memory and non-representational geographies. Geography Compass, 5(12), 875–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, O., & Garde-Hansen, J. (Eds.). (2012). Geography and memory: Explorations in identity, place and becoming. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological view on photo-elicitation. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muzaini, H. (2015). On the matter of forgetting and ‘memory returns’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40, 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dell, T., & Willim, R. (2013). Transcription and the senses. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 314–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2013). Engaging the senses in ethnographic practice: Implications and advances. The Senses and Society, 8(3), 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2017). Technologies, possibilities, emergence and an ethics of responsibility: Refiguring techniques. In E. Gómez-Cruz, S. Sumartojo, & S. Pink (Eds.), Refiguring techniques in digital visual research (pp. 1–11). London: Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S. (2015). On atmosphere and darkness at Australia’s Anzac day Dawn Service. Visual Communication, 14(2), 267–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S. (2016). Commemorative atmospheres: Memorial sites, collective events and the experience of national identity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(4), 541–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S. (2017). Tweeting from the past: Commemorating the Anzac Centenary @ABCNews1915. Memory Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017709873.

  • Sumartojo, S., & Graves, M. (2018). Rust and dust: Materiality and the feel of memory at Camp des Milles. Journal of Material Culture. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183518769110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumartojo, S., & Pink, S. (2017). Empathetic visuality: Go-pros and the video trace. In E. Gómez-Cruz, S. Sumartojo, & S. Pink (Eds.), Refiguring techniques in digital-visual research (pp. 39–49). London: Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., & Peters, K. (2015). Unlocking the carceral atmospheric: Designing extraordinary encounters at the prison museum. Visual Communication, 14(3), 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterton, E., & Dittmer, J. (2014). The museum as assemblage: Bringing forth affect at the Australian war memorial. Museum Management and Curatorship, 29(2), 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witcomb, A. (2013). Understanding the role of affect in producing a critical pedagogy for history museums. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research underpinning this chapter was supported by a visiting fellowship funded by the Foundation Aix-Marseille University and was conducted in collaboration with Matthew Graves. I also wish to thank all the research participants and the staff at the Camp des Milles, particularly Bernard Mossé, and colleagues Gilles Teulié and Sarah Pink.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanti Sumartojo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sumartojo, S. (2019). Sensory Impact: Memory, Affect and Sensory Ethnography at Official Memory Sites. In: Drozdzewski, D., Birdsall, C. (eds) Doing Memory Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1411-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1410-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1411-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics