Skip to main content

Growing Through Partnerships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
School-based Partnerships in Teacher Education

Abstract

While partnerships in teacher education are essential for ensuring adequately preparing teachers, the effects of these partnerships are difficult to capture. The STEPS project analysed five models of a school-based approach to teaching primary science education. These five partnership models were developed to give pre-service teachers a supported, authentic experience of teaching science to school children. The effects of these teaching opportunities for pre-service teachers are explored in this chapter as “growth”: where growth occurs, how this is evidenced, and what is needed to enable growth. A series of vignettes documenting the experiences of pre-service teachers, teacher educators, teachers and principals were developed from interview data, from which a series of themes emerged. A meta-analysis of these themes revealed some common elements across the vignettes that seemed to mark the professional growth of the various stakeholders in terms of shaping their identity and confidence, praxis and relationships. Growth must be evident, measured and documented if the effort to initiate and maintain such partnerships is going to be worthwhile. The question of how to measure growth occurring as a result of partnerships is interrogated in this chapter through the use of data and is linked with current research literature. A growth model is presented, as is an accompanying set of variables that can be used to measure the effects of education-based partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As distinct from ‘lower d’ discourse referring to the general way we talk about something.

  2. 2.

    The Science in Schools (SIS) Project, reported in Tytler (2009). Generated the SIS components of effective teaching and learning which were later modified as the Principles of Teaching and Learning (PoLT) components that were adopted and promoted through the Victorian Department of Education in 2006 (accessible http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/polt.aspx).

  3. 3.

    5E Instructional model (developed by Bybee 1997).

References

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, R. (2008). Powerful pedagogy: Self-study of a teacher educator’s practice. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2006). Principles of learning and teaching. Department of Education. Accessible http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/polt.aspx.

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, G. (2011). Scotland’s future: Report of a review of teacher education in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2010). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. I. (1993). School-university partnerships and partner schools. Educational Policy, 7(1), 24–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, S., & Hobbs, L. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ views of school-based approaches to pre-service primary science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 48, 777–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L. (2013). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11, 271–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Herbert, S., Jones, M., Redman, C., et al. (2015). Interpretive framework. Available http://www.stepsproject.org.au.

  • Hobbs, L., & Kelly, L. (2016). The heart of the educator: Aesthetic experience shaping knowledge, identity and passion. In A. Bellocchi, K. Otrel-Cas, & C. Quigley (Eds.), Beyond cognition in science education: Considering the role of emotions, well-being, and aesthetics (pp. 55–82). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooley, N. (2011). Steer clear of clinical model for education. Campus Review. Retrieved from http://www.campusreview.com.au/2011/06/steer-clear-of-clinical-model-for-teacher-education.

  • House of Representatives Standing Committee on Education and Vocational Training. (2007). Top of the class: Report of the inquiry into teacher education. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/parliamentary_business/committees/house_of_representatives_committees?url=evt/teachereduc/report/fullreport.pdf.

  • Howitt, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in an holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2008). Collaborative partnerships: A model for science teacher education and professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., Hobbs, L., Kenny, J., Campbell, C., Chittleborough, G., Gilbert, A., et al. (2016). Successful university-school partnerships: An interpretive framework to inform partnership practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, T., Davies, A., Eckersley, B., Newell, F., & Cherednichenko, B. (2009). Effective and sustainable university-school partnerships: Beyond determined efforts by inspired individuals. Canberra: AITSL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D., & Smith, R. (2012). Teacher education partnerships: An Australian research-based perspective. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11), 132–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D., & Smith, R. (2013). Teachers for the future: An unmet need. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity an Change, 1(1). Downloaded http://www.ijicc.net/images/issue1volume1/lynch%20and%20smith%20v1i1%20final.pdf.

  • Palmer, D., Dixon, J., & Archer, J. (2015). Changes in science teaching self-efficacy among primary teacher education students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(12), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. (2014). The Melbourne Graduate School of Education Master of Teaching. In M. Jones & J. Ryan (Eds.), Successful teacher education: Partnerships, reflective practice and the place of technology (pp. 11–29). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classrooms: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, G., Weldon, P., Kleinhenz, E., & Ingvarson, L. (2013). School-university partnerships in initial teacher preparation: An evaluation of the School Centres for Teaching Excellence initiative in Victoria. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group (TEMAG). (2014). Action now: Classroom ready teacher. Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2003). A window for a purpose: Developing a framework for describing effective science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 33(3), 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2009). School Innovation in Science: Improving science teaching and learning in Australian schools. International Journal of Science Education, 31(13), 1777–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, J. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London: The Althouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, M. E., & Backe, S. (2013). School-university partnerships: Reflections and opportunities. Peabody Journal of Education, 88(5), 594–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ure, C. (2009). Practicum partnerships: Exploring models of practicum organisation in teacher education for a standards based profession. Final Report. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/ALTCFinalReport_PracticumPartnerships_Electronic.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Hobbs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hobbs, L., Campbell, C. (2018). Growing Through Partnerships. In: Hobbs, L., Campbell, C., Jones, M. (eds) School-based Partnerships in Teacher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1795-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-1794-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-1795-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics