Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Inspiration from Border Crossing: Principle of Boundary Activity for Integrating Learning in the Formal and Informal Spaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Seamless Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Educational Technology ((LNET))

Abstract

With the recognition of the value of learning in informal spaces, it has been proposed that learning in the informal spaces should be an integral part of the formal schooling. The ubiquitous use of mobile technology creates various opportunities for connecting learning in the formal and informal contexts. In seamless learning, different efforts have been devoted to improving the synergy of these two learning contexts supported by mobile technology, but challenges still exist in the design of seamless learning scenarios that involve the pedagogical integration of learning in formal and informal spaces with active boundary interaction. To promote the mutual interaction of learning contexts in seamless learning, and improve the smooth transformation of students’ cognition in crossing borders, we elaborate on the conception of “boundary object” which is borrowed from science education and learning sciences and inspired by the notion of border crossing from the cultural perspectives, as the knot for tightening learning in different contexts. In this chapter, we will summarize the origins of the boundary objects and discuss their application in improving the boundary interactions in seamless learning. Based on these, the principle of boundary activity-based learning (BABL) is articulated for improving the design of seamless learning activities. A BABL lesson exemplar is illustrated for BABL application, and the initial results of a pilot study are discussed. The BABL principle and the research will inform the pedagogical design of technology-supported STEM education and science learning in a seamless learning context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S., & Parsons, D. (2013). Abductive science inquiry using mobile devices in the classroom. Computers & Education, 63, 62–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt, J., & Osborne, J. (2007). Supporting Teachers on Science-focused School Trips: Towards an integrated framework of theory and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 29(6), 685–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Bureau. (2016). Report on promotion of STEM education: Unleashing potential in innovation. Retrieved from: https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/STEM%20Education%20Report_Eng.pdf.

  • Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., & Priest, M. (1997). Models and discourse: A primary school science class visit to a museum. Science Education, 81(6), 749–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28(1), 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: A review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), E65–E70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. M., Kim, D., Yuan, J., Hill, R. B., Doshi, P., & Thai, C. N. (2015). Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers’ STEM engagement, learning, and teaching. Computers & Education, 91, 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel, J. F. (2014). Clarifying the complexities of school–museum interactions: Perspectives from two communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 342–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C.-K., Sun, D., Wu, L., Seow, P., & Chia, G. (2014). Implementing mobile learning curricula in a grade level: Empirical study of learning effectiveness at scale. Computers & Education, 77, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., So, H.-J., Seow, P., Toh, Y., Chen, W., … Soloway, E. (2009). Anatomy of a mobilized lesson: Learning my way. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1120–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, G. (2012). Mobile practices in everyday life: Popular digital technologies and schooling revisited. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(5), 770–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morag, O., & Tal, T. (2012). Assessing learning in the outdoors with the field trip in Natural Environments (FiNE) Framework. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 745–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., Callahan, J., Pyke, P., Hay, A., Dance, M., & Pfiester, J. (2013). Teacher STEM perception and preparation: Inquiry-based STEM professional development for elementary teachers. Journal of Educational Research, 106(2), 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2009). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C: The National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). Successful STEM education: A workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, G., Barker, B., Welch, G., Grandgenett, N., Wu, C., & Nelson, C. (2015). A model of factors contributing to STEM learning and career orientation. International Journal of Science Education, 37(7), 1067–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Recognition of non-formal and informal learning. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyond-school/recognitionofnon-formalandinformallearning-home.htm.

  • Otero, N., Milrad, M., Rogers, Y., Santos, A. J., Verissimo, M., & Torres, N. (2011). Challenges in designing seamless learning scenarios: Affective and emotional effects on external representations. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 5(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, P., Mathews, C., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2013). Using a field trip inventory to determine if listening to elementary school students’ conversations, while on a zoo field trip, enhances preservice teachers’ abilities to plan zoo field trips. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2645–2669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Shrewsbury: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2008). The role of mobile devices in facilitating collaborative inquiry in situ. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 3(3), 209–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Sánchez, I.A., Milrad, M., Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, & S. de Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233–249). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M., Eileen, S., Shaaron, A., Stamatina, A., Trevor, C., Charles, C., … Claire, O.M. (2014). Personal inquiry: Orchestrating science investigations within and beyond the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.944642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So, H.-J., Seow, P., & Looi, C.-K. (2009). Location matters: Leveraging knowledge building with mobile devices and Web 2.0 technology. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y. (2016). “We found the ‘black spots’ on campus on our own”: Development of inquiry skills in primary science learning with BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2012). Fostering personalized learning in science inquiry supported by mobile technologies. Education Technology Research Development, 60(4), 679–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translation and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., & Looi, C.-K. (2017). Boundary interaction: Towards developing a mobile technology-enabled science curriculum to integrate learning in the informal spaces. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., Looi, C.-K., & Wu, L. (2016a). The innovative immersion of mobile learning into a science curriculum in Singapore: An exploratory study. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9471-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, D., Looi, C.-K., Wu, L., & Xie, W. (2016b). The innovative immersion of mobile learning into a science curriculum in Singapore: An exploratory study. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 547–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, L. (2011). Evaluating learning in the 21st century: a digital age learning matrix. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suáreza, A., Spechta, M., Prinsenb, F., Kalza, M., & Terniera, S. (2018). A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry-based learning. Computers & Education, 118, 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, A., & van den Akker, J. (Eds.). (2009). Curriculum in development. Enschede, Netherlands: SLO-Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development. Retrieved from http://www.slo.nl/downloads/2009/curriculum-in-development.pdf/.

  • Thüs, H., Chatti, M. A., Yalcin, E., Pallasch, C., Kyryliuk, B., Mageramov, T., & Schroeder, U. (2012). Mobile learning in context. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 332–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsurusaki, B. K., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., Koch, P., & Contento, I. (2012). Using transformative boundary objects to create critical engagement in science: a case study. Science Education, 97(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., & Wake, G. (2007). Black boxes in workplace mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57, 2364–2381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L.-H., Chen, W., & Jan, M. (2012). How artefacts mediate small-group co-creation activities in a mobile-assisted seamless language learning environment? Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 28(5), 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Bogouslavsky, M., & Yuang, G. (2017). Cross-community interaction for knowledge building in two grade 5/6 classrooms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2017). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J., Tao, T., Chen, M.-H., Sun, Y., Judson D., & Naqvi, S. (2018). Co-organizing the collective journey of inquiry with idea thread mapper. Journal of the Learning Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1444992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Education University of Hong Kong, D4-1/F-15, 10 Lo Ping Rd, Taipo, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Daner Sun

  2. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Chee-Kit Looi

Authors
  1. Daner Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chee-Kit Looi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daner Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Chee-Kit Looi

  2. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore

    Lung-Hsiang Wong

  3. Blended Learning Center, HTW Chur, Chur, Switzerland

    Christian Glahn

  4. Ministry of Education-China Mobile Communications Corporation and School of Educational Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Su Cai

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sun, D., Looi, CK. (2019). An Inspiration from Border Crossing: Principle of Boundary Activity for Integrating Learning in the Formal and Informal Spaces. In: Looi, CK., Wong, LH., Glahn, C., Cai, S. (eds) Seamless Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3071-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3071-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3070-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3071-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation