Skip to main content

Workplace Learning as a Hybrid Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education for Practice in a Hybrid Space

Part of the book series: Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice ((UTLP))

Abstract

Workplace learning (WPL) is an educational partnership between students, university and industry or community where learning and working are blended and occur across boundaries between academia and work. To better understand the ways in which WPL can be most productive for all stakeholders involved (and this includes students, workplace learning educators and academics), this chapter builds on the ideas in Chap. 1 conceptualising WPL as a hybrid space. Initially, it discusses theoretical ideas of hybridity and its characteristics. It offers a way of thinking of WPL as a space where something new can be created emerging from the in-between space of academia and work. Then, it considers the many aspects of WPL that become hybrid including professional roles and identities. The chapter then focuses on WPL as a hybrid pedagogy, characterised by collaborative, agentic and participatory learning that leads to active integration of formal university learning with formal, non-formal and informal learning in professional settings. The chapter concludes that WPL as a hybrid space is a useful concept to meaningfully bring together binaries of curriculum and pedagogy, theory and practice, thinking and doing, and structure and agency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acheraïou, A. (2011). Questioning hybridity, postcolonialism and globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81, 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1992). On organisational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R. (2010). Framing education for practice. In J. Higgs, D. Fish, I. Goulter, S. Loftus, J. Reid, & F. Trede (Eds.), Education for future practice (pp. 15–28). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2012). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhabha, H. K. (2004). The location of culture. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2002). Toward a workplace pedagogy: Guidance, participation and engagement. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2009). Realising the educational worth of integrating work experiences in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 827–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2010). Learning through practice. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 1–20). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2011). Curriculum and pedagogic bases for effectively integrating practice-based experiences. ALTC final report. Sydney: The Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D. (2016). Taking professional practice seriously: Implications for deliberate course design. In F. Trede & C. McEwen (Eds.), Educating the deliberate professional: Preparing for emergent futures (pp. 157–174). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boud, D., & Symes, C. (2000). Learning for real: Work-based education in universities. In C. Symes & J. McIntryre (Eds.), Working knowledge: The new vocationalism and higher education (pp. 14–30). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyte, H. C., & Fretz, E. (2012). Civic professionalism. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 14(2), 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunstein, L., Takei, H., Wang, F., & Loken, M. K. (2011). Benefits of cooperative and work-integrated education for employers. In R. K. Coll & K. Zegwaard (Eds.), International handbook for cooperative and work-integrated education: International perspectives of theory, research and practice (pp. 277–286). Hamilton: WACE Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L., & Goodyear, P. (Eds.). (2014). The architecture of productive learning networks. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2011). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, L., Orrell, J. & Bowden, M. (2010). Work Integrated Learning: A guide to effective practice. Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. (2006). Theorizing the university as a cultural system: Distinctions, identities, emergencies. Educational Theory, 56, 255–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, C., & Coll, R. K. (2010). Cooperative education: Integrating classroom and workplace learning. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 180–196). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. G. (2011). Paramedic preceptor: Work readiness in graduate paramedics. The Clinical Teacher, 8(2), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00435.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Fowler, Z. (2007). Unsettling boundaries in making a space for research. British Educational Research Journal, 33, 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteläpelto, A. (2008). Perspectives, prospects and progress in work-integrated learning. In S. Billett, C. Harteis, & A. Eteläpelto (Eds.), Emerging perspectives of workplace learning (pp. 233–248). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (2010). Knowledge, working practices, and learning. In S. Billett (Ed.), Learning through practice: Models, traditions, orientations and approaches (pp. 37–58). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2014). Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices and responsibilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1993). Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seasbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., & Trede, F. (2017). Strengthening attainment of student learning outcomes during work integrated learning: A collaborative governance framework across academia, industry and students. Asia Pacific Journal of Cooperative Education, 18(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency. Sociological Theory, 25(2), 170–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., Ladyshevsky, R., Smith, M., Trede, F., & Flavell, H. (2012). Leading fieldwork: Academic leadership for fieldwork coordinators [final report]. Sydney: Office for Learning and Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (2014). Praxis, practice and practice architectures. In S. Kemmis, J. Wilkinson, C. Edwards-Groves, I. Hardy, P. Grotenboer, & L. Bristol (Eds.), Changing practices, changing education (pp. 25–36). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & Trede, F. (2010). Practice and developing future practice. In J. Higgs, D. Fish, I. Goulter, S. Loftus, J.-A. Reid, & F. Trede (Eds.), Education for future practice (pp. 29–39). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source for learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New York: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreber, C. (2016). Educating for civic-mindedness: Nurturing authentic professional identities through transformative higher education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhanga, F., Myrick, F., & Yonge, O. (2010). The preceptorship experience: An examination of ethical and accountability issues. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(5), 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEwen, C., & Trede, F. (2014). The academisation of emerging professions: Implications for universities, academics and students. Power and Education, 6(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.2304/power.2014.6.2.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martini, M. C., & Fabbris, L. (2017). Beyond employment rate: A multidimensional indicator of higher education effectiveness. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 130(1), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mambrol, N. (2016, April 6). Postcolonialism. Literacy Theory and Criticism. Retrieved from https://literariness.org/2016/04/06/postcolonialism/.

  • Molloy, E., Lew, S., Woodward-Kron, R., Delany, C., Dodds, A., Lavercombe, M., Hughson, J. (2018). Medical student clinical placements as sites of learning and contribution. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, M. (2006). Teaching defiance: Stories and strategies for activist educators. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D., & Roe, B. (2014). Diffractive methods of rethinking professional practice. In T. Fenwick & M. Nerland (Eds.), Reconceptualising professional learning: Sociomaterial knowledges, practices and responsibilities (pp. 67–82). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organized life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orrell, J. (2011). Good practice report: Work-integrated learning. Sydney: The Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1996). Third space: Journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial formations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & Horsfall, D. (2016). From discourse to visioning: Eliciting future practice and marginalia. In J. Higgs & F. Trede (Eds.), Professional practice marginalia (pp. 243–254). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2012). Developing a critical professional identity: Engaging self in practice. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-based education: Perspectives and strategies (pp. 27–40). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2015). Critical thinking for future practice. In M. Davies and R. Barnett (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (pp. 457-475). New York: Palgrave Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2016). Scoping the deliberate professional. In F. Trede & C. McEwen (Eds.), Educating the deliberate professional: Preparing for emergent futures (pp. 3–14). Dodrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universities Australia, Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Ai Group, Business Council of Australia & Australian Collaborative Education Network. (2014). National strategy on work integrated learning in university education. Retrieved from http://cdn1.acen.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/National-WIL-Strategy-in-university-education-032015.pdf.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. J. C. (1995). Colonial desire: Hybridity in theory, culture, and race. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 89–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Trede .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Trede, F., Markauskaite, L., McEwen, C., Macfarlane, S. (2019). Workplace Learning as a Hybrid Space. In: Education for Practice in a Hybrid Space. Understanding Teaching-Learning Practice. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7410-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7410-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7409-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7410-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics